Quantcast
Channel: Hedge Funds
Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live

Jonathan Soros is pumping $300 million into a new hedge fund run by one of his father's former portfolio managers

$
0
0

Jonathan Soros

  • Courtney Carson, the former Soros Fund Management distressed-debt head, has gotten $300 million from Jonathan Soros' JS Capital for his new hedge fund, Hein Park, sources told Business Insider.
  • Carson left Soros Fund Management in May, one of a dozen money managers who have departed since Dawn Fitzpatrick took over as chief investment officer, Bloomberg reported.
  • Carson previously worked for Deutsche Bank and Richard Brennan's Camulos Capital and did several stints at Soros Fund Management.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Jonathan Soros is backing one of his dad's former portfolio managers. 

The younger Soros' JS Capital is investing $300 million in Courtney Carson's new fund, named Hein Park after the historic district in Carson's hometown of Memphis, Tennessee, sources told Business Insider.

Carson left Soros Fund Management in May after running the firm's distressed-credit book since the beginning of 2016. Bloomberg reported that his team would stay at Soros Fund Management for the rest of the year. 

Carson, a graduate of Notre Dame and an alum of Deutsche Bank and Richard Brennan's Camulos Capital, is one of about a dozen money managers that have left George Soros' family office since new Chief Investment Officer Dawn Fitzpatrick took over. 

But Carson's clearly kept in touch with the family after his departure, as JS Capital is now lined up as one of the biggest backers for his new fund. It is unclear when the fund will launch or how much it hopes to begin trading with. 

Other investors who Soros' sons have backed include Santiago Jariton, who started Emerging Variant in 2017 after working for George Soros for more than a decade. Both Jonathan and Robert Soros invested in Jariton's new fund, according to media reports

JS Capital declined to comment. Carson did not respond to requests for comment. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map shows where American accents came from


South Korea's largest hedge fund freezes $710 million as investors try to pull funds

$
0
0

south korean trader won

  • Lime Asset Management — South Korea's largest hedge fund — has frozen a total of $710 million in withdrawals as investors rush to pull their cash from the firm, Bloomberg reported. 
  • The firm, which oversees about $4.1 billion, said it's struggling to sell assets fast enough to pay out investors, the report found.
  • The investor redemptions began after the firm confirmed last that it was under investigation by Korean financial authorities over investments in convertible bonds. 
  • Visit the Business Insider homepage for more stories.

South Korea's largest hedge fund has frozen a total of $710 million in assets as investors rush to pull their capital from the firm.  

According to Bloomberg, Lime Asset Management froze another $210 million in funds on Monday after locking up about $500 million in assets last week. 

The firm said its freezing redemptions because it can't sell assets quickly enough to meet investor demand for withdrawals, Bloomberg reported. 

"Due to the recent drop in the Kosdaq market and also declines in stocks of companies we've invested in, it became hard to obtain liquidity by converting the bonds into the stocks as we planned," CEO Won Jong-Jun said during a press briefing, according to Bloomberg

Investors began pulling funds from Lime — which oversees about $4.1 billion in assets — last week after the firm confirmed earlier this week that its under investigation by Korean financial authorities over investments in convertible bonds. 

Convertible bonds allow investors to convert their investment into a specified number of shares. An official at South Korea's Financial Supervisory Service told Bloomberg last week that its looking into whether Lime bought convertible bonds from zombie companies. 

Read more: Nobel laureate Robert Shiller forewarned investors about the dot-com and housing bubbles. Now he tells us which irrational market behaviors have him most worried.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What El Chapo is really like, according to the wife of one his closest henchman

Hedge funds pumped more than $200 million into a family of crypto funds last quarter even though performance tanked

$
0
0

A token of the virtual currency Bitcoin is seen placed on a monitor that displays binary digits in this illustration picture, December 8, 2017. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

  • Grayscale Investments, which runs ten crypto-linked investment trusts, had more than a quarter of a billion dollars-worth of inflows in the third quarter, with an overwhelming majority coming from hedge funds. 
  • Crypto and crypto-linked products were hit hard over the same period, with bitcoin's price falling by 25% in the quarter.
  • Grayscale launched a marketing campaign in May to urge investors to swap gold for crypto in their portfolios.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories. 

Bitcoin got crushed. Hedge funds didn't care.

That's the story of the third quarter, according to Grayscale Investments. The $2.2 billion asset manager runs 10 different crypto-linked products.

According to the firm's recently released flow numbers, last quarter was the most money the firm has seen flowing into its products ever — with $254.9 million in total.

And the overwhelming majority of those assets — 84% — came from hedge funds. That's a marked increase from the first quarter of this year, when hedge funds represented just 56% of the flows. 

"There is an across-the-board sentiment that digital currencies is an asset class that is not going away," said Michael Sonnenshein, managing director of Grayscale.

See more: Jonathan Soros is pumping $300 million into a new hedge fund run by one of his father's former portfolio managers

What's notable is that hedge funds were pumping in money while the most popular currency, bitcoin, was hit hard. Bitcoin fell by 25% in the three months ending Sept. 30 but has still outperformed nearly every asset class this year, with the price more than doubling since the beginning of 2019 despite the third-quarter woes.

Grayscale products likewise slumped in the quarter, with each one losing at least 30% of its value, but Sonnenshein believes hedge funds have noticed the bigger picture. For instance, the firm's biggest offering — a bitcoin-linked trust — has notched returns of more than 5,500% since it was launched in 2013. 

"They're looking for alternatives for new sources of alpha," he said, while attributing the volume of flows partially to the firm's marketing campaign it launched in May that implored investors to drop gold in favor of crypto in their portfolios.

Hedge funds, despite post their best start to the year since 2013 with an average return of 4.9%, have still struggled to outperform the general market, pushing investors to demand greater transparency and more lenient fee structures. Crypto, Sonnenshein said, has been seen as a way for them to boost returns.

"They're having a hard time finding an investment opportunity with a better risk-return profile right now than bitcoin."

See more: The clock is about to strike midnight on a hedge fund's $1 million bet on bitcoin soaring above $50,000

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What El Chapo is really like, according to the wife of one his closest henchman

$8.8 billion ExodusPoint's head of data strategy is out, but the hedge fund's 15-person data team has no plans to slow down

$
0
0

Chris Petrescu

  • ExodusPoint lost its head of data strategy, Chris Petrescu, last week, sources told Business Insider. 
  • Petrescu was in charge of finding alternative datasets for the hedge fund's portfolio managers to use, and he was a frequent panelist at data conferences. 
  • Exodus, Michael Gelband's $8.8 billion hedge fund, still has a 15-person data team, a person close to the firm told Business Insider.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Chris Petrescu, ExodusPoint's head of data strategy, left the $8.8 billion hedge fund last week, sources told Business Insider.

Petrescu was in charge of finding alternative datasets to buy for the firm's many portfolio-management teams, and he was a frequent panelist at high-profile data conferences. The firm still has a 15-person data team run by Anil Chandroth, the head of data science and Petrescu's former boss, and the team's strategy remains unchanged, according to a source close to the firm.

Exodus declined to comment. Petrescu did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 

Read more: Hedge funds' secret sauce is obscure data like satellite images. Here's how the people in charge of spending millions on this data find the stuff worth buying.

Hedge funds have turned to alternative data to boost returns, which has spurred an explosion of startups. The industry tracker AlternativeData.org says there are 445 alternative-data vendors — a huge leap from 10 years ago, when there were just over 100 vendors. 

To filter through the now overwhelming number of data streams for sale, hedge funds employ data buyers like Petrescu to find data that is unique and proven to generate returns. At conferences like BattleFin, where vendors are hawking their products, these data buyers can have dozens of meetings in a day on the search for game-changing data. 

As data has grown in prominence, the data buyers have also grown in stature. A lawsuit between WorldQuant and Third Point a couple years ago revealed that Dan Loeb's firm was paying the data-strategy head Matthew Ober $2 million a year to woo him away from Igor Tulchinsky's firm.

Read more: Nasdaq-owned alt-data seller Quandl just hired BlueMountain's former data buyer to get inside hedge fund clients' heads

Petrescu also worked at WorldQuant from 2014 to 2017 as a data strategist before leading data strategy for Exodus. The $8.8 billion hedge fund's first year of trading underwhelmed, returning less than 1% in the second half of 2018. 

This year, the firm has returned about 4% through the end of September, trailing multistrategy rivals like Point72, Balyasny, Citadel, and Millennium, Gelband's old firm, but it made money in last month — 0.4% — when many big names were hit by the dramatic swings in oil and momentum stocks

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Maverick Capital's human stock pickers are shining, but quant strategies at Lee Ainslie's $8.8 billion fund are in the red and lagging their peers

$
0
0

Lee Ainslie

  • The $8.8 billion hedge fund Maverick Capital's fundamental fund line — which includes three funds with different amounts of leverage — has beaten the average hedge fund through the first three quarters of 2019, while the firm's quant funds have lost money.
  • The two quant funds have lost 5.9% and 9.8% through the end of September. The average quant fund has had positive returns of 6.25%, according to Hedge Fund Research.
  • Human stock pickers have been leading the pack this year, with big names like Bill Ackman and David Einhorn posting big numbers, while quants like Winton and Systematica have lagged behind.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Maverick Capital's long-running fundamental stock-picking funds have outperformed peers in 2019. Meanwhile, the $8.8 billion manager's quant strategies are just hoping to break even by the end of the year.

An up-and-down first half of the year for quant funds — when managers like Winton, Systematica, and Renaissance Technologies posted returns that veered from mediocre to poor — was made worse in September, when a massive shift in momentum stocks hit many computer-driven funds. An investor document from Lee Ainslie's Dallas-based firm shows Maverick was not spared. 

The document says that the two quant funds at Maverick, which manage a combined $930 million, lost 3.7% and 5.7% in the third quarter, and are down 5.9% and 9.8% for the year. That comes as the average quant has returned 6.25% through the end of September, according to Hedge Fund Research, less than the 8% return for the average equity hedge fund on the year.

Read more: Izzy Englander just landed a quant team that was managing hundreds of millions for billionaire Michael Platt

But the firm's fundamental funds, which have been running since Ainslie started the firm in the early 1990s, have all made money this year. The Maverick LDC, the Maverick Levered, and the Maverick Long Enhanced posted returns of 10.4%, 20.4%, and 23.4%, respectively, through the end of September. Together, the three funds manage over $3.8 billion.

Maverick appears to have avoided the hits several of its stock-picking peers took when momentum crashed, as all of its fundamental funds were positive for the third quarter. Comparatively, Tiger Cub Coatue fell by 5%, thanks to the crash, and Steve Cohen's Point72 lost money because of the out-of-the-blue market shift, according to Bloomberg.

Ainslie's quant funds have not matched the yearly returns of the firm's stock-picking strategies so far, according to the document. In the four years the two quant strategies have been running, annualized returns for both sit below 6%. The lowest annualized return for the fundamental strategies is 10.4%. 

A spokesman for Maverick declined to comment.

Read more: WorldQuant's Igor Tulchinsky just guaranteed his team 75% of last year's performance bonus to soothe nerves as quant funds get slammed

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Most hurricanes that hit the US and Caribbean islands come from the same exact spot in the world

AT&T survived round one with activist hedge fund Elliott. Now, the company has to fill a board seat and weigh spin-offs under the fund's close watch.

$
0
0

att campaign 4x3

  • Elliott's $3.2 billion stake in AT&T has pushed the telecom giant to add two new board members and split the chairman and CEO roles for Randall Stephenson's successor. The influential hedge fund is not done, though.
  • Sources tell Business Insider that one of the new board members has not been picked yet and Stephenson's one-time successor-in-waiting, John Stankey, is auditioning for Stephenson's job, though has not been guaranteed the role. 
  • The firm is also reviewing its portfolio of companies, according to a statement on Monday, with the possibility of a sale for some of AT&T's big brands, like DirecTV.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

AT&T didn't waste time reaching an agreement with Paul Singer's activist hedge fund, Elliott Management.

Just a little over seven weeks after the $38 billion fund announced its campaign with a $3.2 billion investment in AT&T, the telecom giant has acquiesced on several of the fund's demands. Chief among them is a cost-cutting plan, to be led by former cable executive Bill Morrow, the addition of two new members to the company's board, and a review of the firm's sprawling list of portfolio companies.

But the lion's share of the work still remains. One of the two new board members has not been selected, sources tell Business Insider, and Elliott is pushing for someone with a media background. And while a review of the portfolio may bring about a sale of a brand like DirecTV, nothing is guaranteed, especially if the market is uninterested in AT&T's undesired pieces. 

"There are no sacred cows," said Randall Stephenson, AT&T's CEO, on the firm's earnings call Monday morning about the firm's list of portfolio companies. 

See more: We talked to 24 people about the hedge-fund wunderkind at Elliott who wants to shake up AT&T. Here's why management should be terrified.

Sources familiar with the back-and-forth between Stephenson and the hedge fund, whose campaign was led by its head of U.S. activism, Jesse Cohn, said Stephenson was open to the hedge fund's suggestions despite some initial skepticism of Elliott. 

Stephenson agreed that his successor as CEO would not hold the chairman role as well, like he currently does, for example, and has opened up the search for his successor beyond his hand-picked candidate, president and chief operating officer John Stankey, who will be removed as the CEO of WarnerMedia once a replacement is found. Elliott is pushing for an executive with more media experience to fill that WarnerMedia role. 

Despite Stephenson's acceptance of many of Elliott's proposals, AT&T still has to execute. A review of portfolio companies does not necessarily mean a sale of certain brands, though it is expected to from Elliott's side.

"There's a lot of low-hanging fruit here, like it's almost touching the ground," one person close with Elliott said.

AT&T already sold its Puerto Rico operation to Liberty Latin America for nearly $2 billion earlier this month.

While one new board member is already agreed upon by AT&T and Elliott — and will join the board later this week — the second new member is still unknown. The hedge fund is pushing for someone with media experience, which it identified as a weak spot given the job now involves overseeing operations like HBO. 

The second new board member will start at the firm in 2020, though the company could look drastically different by then, depending on what happens over the next two months.

"There's going to be a lot more announcements, a lot more markers, coming out in the next few months," the person close to Elliott said.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Most hurricanes that hit the US and Caribbean islands come from the same exact spot in the world

An SEC official is siding with big asset managers that say hedge funds like Saba Capital should be banned from taking activist stakes in closed-end funds

$
0
0

robert jackson SEC commissioner

  • The US Securities and Exchange Commission's Robert Jackson hopes to prevent the kind of closed-end fund activism that funds like Boaz Weinstein's Saba Capital have engaged in. 
  • Jackson, in an interview with Business Insider, said the SEC needs to protect the retail investors who choose closed-end funds for the fixed payouts the structure offers, and hopes to get the issue in front of the full commission before the end of the year.
  • "I'm not interested in protecting funds. I'm interested in protecting investors," the SEC commissioner told us. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

The closed-end fund activism that Boaz Weinstein's Saba Capital made famous has gotten the attention of securities regulators.

Robert Jackson of the Securities and Exchange Commission told Business Insider that getting the issue in front of the SEC's full body was a priority for him — one he hopes to push forward before the end of the year. The chairman of the SEC, Jay Clayton, sets the agenda for what the commission will hear, and Jackson acknowledged that the timing will depend on Clayton's priorities. 

"I'm not interested in protecting funds, I'm interested in protecting investors," said Jackson, who noted that the "millions" of retail investors in closed-end funds are not interested in the short-term gains activist campaigns run by Saba and other hedge funds are looking to provide.

Closed-end funds' shares trade like stocks, allowing hedge funds to build large stakes and force changes to the funds' boards, often through proxy fights, which can result in funds liquidating for a quick return. On top of the time and money asset managers need to spend on proxy fights, liquidations can hurt their fee revenue, and activists can force them to pay out dividend-like tenders.

Asset managers like BlackRock, Neuberger Berman, and Legg Mason have tried to fight Saba in court and public opinion, but have so far been unsuccessful in stopping Weinstein and his peers from conducting campaigns. Closed-end funds have a fixed number of shares, and the price per share can sometimes decouple from the value of the underlying securities, making them an attractive mark for activists.  

See more: Saba Capital is targeting a unit of Legg Mason in an activist campaign. Another Legg Mason business stands to profit if it's successful.

One lawyer at an asset manager who asked not to be identified because it is in the midst of a campaign said their firm has asked the SEC to curtail the practice. 

"Frankly this is something the SEC has to care about," the person said. "This isn't constructive activism."

Hedge funds involved in the space push back on this criticism, however. The average closed-end fund trades at a price nearly 4% below the value of its holdings because of the fees and structure of the funds, hedge funds argue, and activism campaigns often push the share price closer to what the holdings are worth. 

Funds that prevent activists, either through majority ownership by the fund creator or through rules written into their charters, often have the greatest discounts. Bill Ackman's closed-end fund Pershing Square Holdings, which trades in the Netherlands, trades at a price more than 20% below what the holdings are worth, and is immune to activists thanks to Ackman's majority stake in it. 

"Closed-End funds with discounts to [net asset value] above 20% year after year have one thing in common — their investors are trapped due to conditions put in place by the manager to prevent activism. If activism were to be curtailed broadly, the immediate loss to mom and pop shareholders would likely be in excess of $40 billion. Through activism, managers can be compelled to reduce fees and narrow discounts, thereby improving long-term returns and liquidity for all market participants," Saba said in a statement provided to Business Insider. 

For his part, Jackson is taking the side of the closed-end fund providers, telling Business Insider that the retail investors are not interested in a quick bump in the trading price. 

"[Hedge funds'] best argument is 'why can't we be free to buy as many shares as we want and redeem them at a higher price?'" said the commissioner, who is expected to leave the regulator sometime this fall. "And my response to that is that's not the deal retail investors signed on to when they invested, and I'm here to protect them, not hedge funds."

Before Trump-appointed Jackson joined the SEC in January 2018, he had co-authored a paper on closed-end activism that found it often led to the liquidation of funds — something Jackson believes harms retail investors.

Funds like Saba point to the fact that closed-end funds that do liquidate give investors the chance to exit the fund at the highest value possible, and then re-invest in products with lower fees and similar payouts, like open-end mutual funds or ETFs.

A Morningstar report found that closed-end funds have fees that are significantly higher than their open-end counterparts, even when adjusted for the additional leverage that closed-end funds can use. 

Weinstein, whose fund runs more than $1.7 billion, has already beaten BlackRock in court, and has the backing of some of the biggest names in finance, counting EnTrust Global as an investor. The firm has not slowed down, even in the face of growing animosity from the asset management industry — Saba recently took a large stake in Eaton Vance's Floating Rate Income fund, which has $130 million in assets. 

See more: Hedge-fund investors want a deal on fees. Managers don't start negotiating until the check hits $120 million.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Wall Street pros and everyday investors have dramatically different views on the market. Here's why the chief strategist at Charles Schwab says that could spell deep trouble for stocks.

$
0
0

traders disagree

  • Data suggests that there's a growing split between some of the most experienced investors on Wall Street and the least.
  • According to statistics from SentimenTrader, hedge funds and institutional investors are growing more pessimistic about stocks while retail investors are getting more optimistic.
  • Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab, says that when the two groups disagree, the experienced investors are usually right.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

As much as Wall Street focuses on hard numbers like earnings, sales, and GDP growth, feelings are never far behind — although traders prefer the more concrete-sounding term "sentiment."

The importance of sentiment usually boils down to a few basic ideas. Are investors comfortable putting their money into the market? Are they more fearful than the facts say they should be? Are they irrationally optimistic, signaing they're unprepared for trouble?

But questions like that can lump all investors together. Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist at Charles Schwab, which has $3.8 trillion in assets under management, says she pays attention to lots of measures of sentiment, but is looking at a more complex question today: How are different groups of investors feeling?

Sonders explains that institutional investors, hedge funds, and other longtime pros are getting more pessimistic about the performance of stocks, while individual investors are getting far more optimistic. And the gap between them is getting large.

When those two types of investors strongly disagree, history shows that the first group is usually right and the second group is wrong — which is why Sonders and a lot of other pros call it "the smart money" and the second group "the dumb money."

"Typically at extremes and directionally, the smart money tends to be right and the dumb money tends to be wrong," Sonders said in an exclusive interview with Business Insider. That is, if the smart money is worried and dumb money is hopeful, the market is likely to fall. In the opposite scenario, stocks usually go up.

There are lots of investor surveys, but Sonders says she's keeping an eye on how these two groups are actually positioning their money. One importance source of data for her comes from Sundial Capital Research's SentimenTrader, which aims to track the behavior of both groups of investors.

The firm's Smart Money Confidence tracker includes data such as the relationship between stocks and bonds and commercial hedge fund positions inequity index futures. It also has a Dumb Money Confidence statistic based on inputs like stock-only put/call ratio and tracking small speculators in equity index futures contracts.

The chart below backs up the idea that there's a growing split between the two sides. It shows how wide the gap between "smart money" and "dumb money" has been over the past 10 years. It's been more extreme a few times over the last decade, including late last year, shortly before the market nosedived.

Sonders says that the trend could be a sign of danger for stocks.

Smart vs. dumb money

"Sentiment has started to look a little bit frothy," Sonders said, with stocks at all-time highs as investors focus on positives like the health of the economy, lower interest rates, and the "phase one" trade agreement, and ignore threats like fallout from the broader trade war and its effect on business investment.

"When sentiment starts to reflect that at an extreme, that tends to be a contrarian indicator for the market because it sets you up for disappointment," she added. "If everybody is optimistic and everybody thinks the market is great, they're probably invested already and there's not as much fuel going forward."

SEE ALSO: 'I would always rather be late': A chief researcher advising a $67 billion fund reveals his strategy for avoiding disaster in a market obsessed with growth

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A big-money investor in juggernauts like Facebook and Netflix breaks down the '3rd wave' firms that are leading the next round of tech disruption


Billionaire hedge-fund founder Ray Dalio says low interest rates have allowed companies to sell 'dreams instead of earnings'

$
0
0

Ray Dalio

  • Speaking at the Greenwich Economic Forum on Tuesday morning, the billionaire hedge-fund founder Ray Dalio told attendees that low interest rates created the boom of idealistic but money-losing companies.
  • "Because the world is looking for yield, companies can sell dreams instead of earnings," Dalio said at the Delamar Hotel in Greenwich, Connecticut.
  • There are fears that the era of the unicorn may be coming to an end, with the markets rejecting WeWork's failed IPO and Uber's struggles as a public company.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Two billionaires sat on a stage Tuesday morning in Greenwich, Connecticut, shocked at the state of the world.

The hedge-fund founders Ray Dalio and Paul Tudor Jones spent 45 minutes telling attendees of the Greenwich Economic Forum why the current situation in economics, politics, and everything in between has, as Dalio put it, "gone mad."

The two touched on topics from the 2020 election to capitalism fixes, but they agreed on one of the main drivers behind most global trends: ultralow interest rates.

A world starved for yield, Dalio said, has made investors look past traditional financial metrics when evaluating possible investments. 

"Because the world is looking for yield, companies can sell dreams instead of earnings," he said in Delamar Hotel's ballroom. "There's a reaching that's happening because people need yield."

While Dalio did not mention any companies by name, there have been several examples of how investors supported and possibly inflated companies despite a lack of a clear path to profitability. WeWork's valuation has been cut by about 80% since it pulled a planned initial public offering, and founder Adam Neumann was forced to step down by the firm's biggest investor, SoftBank.

Uber's stock price has continued to fall since its IPO as the ride-hailing company continues to turn in wide losses.

A recent story in The Atlantic on the unicorn boom said several of the biggest consumer-facing unicorns — with names like Peloton, Casper, and DoorDash — were spending billions more on luring new customers than they were going to bring in in revenue.

Greed is no longer good

But Dalio, who founded Bridgewater, said the low interest rates were hurting more than just investors that have been burned by bad unicorn bets. The smartest investors, he said, have allocated to credit, and that capital "is not going to trickle down" to the average person and the community at large — adding to the wealth gap the billionaire has called a national emergency.

Tudor Jones, who runs the eponymous hedge fund, believes the fix to the wealth gap and capitalism is "fairly easy." The focus can no longer solely be on shareholder returns, he said, adding that 6 million employees of public companies do not make a living wage. The era of Gordon Gekko's "greed-is-good" ethos has broken the system, he said.

"Greed got us the opioid crisis. Greed got us a wealth disparity that is five times worse than what it was 50 years ago. Greed got us the most divisive environment this country has ever had," Tudor Jones said. 

Dalio disagreed with Tudor Jones that investors like themselves could solve this issue simply by pressuring corporate boards to pay its employees more. Instead, he pitched getting a group of economists and people with "on-the-ground experience" together, and "locking them in a room for six months" to find a solution, but acknowledged it was a pipe dream.

"I think, instead, we are going to try and kill each other," Dalio said. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio is sharing the apps behind the hedge fund's 'radical' culture with the public. They feature real-time employee ratings and a 'pain button.'

$
0
0

Ray Dalio

  • Billionaire hedge fund founder Ray Dalio is known for his "radical transparency" when it comes to corporate culture as much as for his investing prowess.
  • Dalio, the founder of Bridgewater, has built an algorithmic way of evaluating employees, who can in turn evaluate him in real time, and is planning to release the platform to the public in about three months. 
  • "I would know what you're thinking, you'd know what everyone else is thinking," he said. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Ray Dalio wants you to know what your co-workers and boss think about you all the time, in real time.

The billionaire founder of Bridgewater said he will soon be releasing to the public the employee feedback platform that the firm uses — starting with its well-known dot system in about three months. With that dot system, employees and bosses rate each other based on factors like assertiveness, intelligence, and open-mindedness. 

In a talk to a room full of investors and peers at the Greenwich Economic Forum on Tuesday afternoon, Dalio laid out why he thinks his strategy — which uses the same basic quantitative decision-making algorithms that the investment teams use — would work in any corporate setting. 

"It offers in-the-moment, computer-driven coaching on how to best handle a situation," he said. A video was played on the dot system, in which a Bridgewater employee — "Jenn, the 24-year-old fresh out of college"— challenges Dalio on the platform after he presents an idea. The presentation prompted some surprised laughter out of the crowd in the Delamar Hotel ballroom.

"Yep, we really do that," Dalio said to skeptical audience members after the video finished. 

The system, which includes tools that break down potential employees from their first interview to the end of their career, is laid out in one of Dalio's books on principles, which also is in app form. One of the tools, used when evaluating potential new employees, breaks down people by attributes so you can see them by their "Lego bits," Dalio said.

"You can say 'Ok, what are their attributes [I like] because I want another one of those," he said. 

Other tools include things like the daily update, so Dalio can keep track of people's stress levels, and the pain button, which employees click on when they are frustrated with a task. 

"Nature gave us psychological pain for a reason," Dalio said, describing the button, but added that it also forces you to come up with a plan to deal with it. If a task continues to frustrate an employee, then it is recorded.

"It creates a kind of bio feedback," he said. 

While Dalio called his corporate culture "radical," the billionaire is also confident it can work in any office or environment. When asked by the audience why he believes in the system's universality, he noted that the book on principles has been translated into 34 languages, and that he was told by people in China it was among the best-selling books in the country. 

Bosses and employees, he said, have to be comfortable with how they act and how people think about them. He asked how people would react if "I would know what you're thinking, you'd know what everyone else is thinking" during the talk. 

"Not everyone likes to look in the mirror."

SEE ALSO: Billionaire hedge-fund founder Ray Dalio says low interest rates have allowed companies to sell 'dreams instead of earnings'

SEE ALSO: Inside a meeting of elite investors, which mixed in yacht and jet sales pitches with doom-and-gloom recession talk

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

The business of offering transparent hedge-fund-like strategies is booming, even as the hedge-fund industry itself struggles

$
0
0

magnifying glass

  • Hedge funds are not always known for their transparency, even with their own investors, but side industries have popped up offering investors hedge-fund-like strategies in a more open wrapper. 
  • Some asset managers are pinning their hopes on growth in liquid alternative exchange-traded funds. Those kinds of ETFs are expected to triple in assets over the next 12 months, according to a Greenwich Associates survey on behalf of IndexIQ. 
  • Money continues to pour into managed-account platforms like BNY's HedgeMark, despite the hedge-fund industry losing assets.
  • Apart from simple curiosity about what they're invested in, big investors worried about putting money in crowded trades are growing more sophisticated with what they can do with data about strategies and the sources of return. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

A receding tide is not sinking all ships for hedge-fund-like strategies.

The $3.2 trillion subset of the asset-management space has had six straight quarters of investor outflows, according to the latest data from the industry tracker eVestment, with $77 billion more assets leaving hedge funds this year than going into them. Underwhelming returns compared with the market coupled with high fees have soured investors on the space they once clamored to get into. 

But some structures offering hedge-fund-like strategies are booming. Managed-account platforms, which let investors set up an individualized account with a manager, continue to grow, with BNY Mellon's HedgeMark platform, on which a hedge-fund manager runs a pool from a third-party investor who gets to customize the strategy, growing assets by nearly a third in the first half of this year to $21 billion. 

Liquid alternative exchange-traded funds, which look to mimic the strategies of hedge funds with less leverage, are seen nearly tripling in assets over the next 12 months, according to a study from Greenwich Associates commissioned by the ETF provider IndexIQ, from $47 billion to $114 billion. Previously, investors with the biggest pools of money — pensions, endowments, and others — were not comfortable enough with the ETF structure to consider this option, the study said.

The industry's biggest investors, it turns out, still are attracted to hedge-fund-like strategies — they just want to know more about what they are investing in. Apart from simple curiosity about what they're invested in, big investors worried about putting money in crowded trades are growing more sophisticated with what they can do with data about strategies and the sources of return. 

"Transparency is a key driver in this demand," Andrew Lapkin, the CEO of HedgeMark, said. On managed-account platforms, investors can get daily transparency into trades and risk, instead of a monthly letter that does not give a real-time look at the portfolio. Groups like the CFA Institute have tried to shed more light on hedge-fund performance with codified performance-reporting standards, but it still requires industrywide buy-in

Read more: An SEC official is siding with big asset managers that say hedge funds like Saba Capital should be banned from taking activist stakes in closed-end funds

Liquid alternative ETFs, like the ones offered by the New York Life subsidiary IndexIQ, offer even more transparency, since their individual holdings are public and the funds themselves are required to be very liquid. As ETFs multiply and grow assets — passive products recently hit the 50% mark of equity investments —  providers have been looking for ways to offer funds that stand out in the crowd. 

These strategies have struggled to take off, partially because of their fees, which are much higher than the average ETF but much cheaper than the average hedge fund. These ETFs offer approaches inspired by hedge-fund strategies like merger arbitrage. At IndexIQ, the merger-arbitrage strategy does not short individual stocks but, instead, places bets againstentire industries.

"We think that the ETF structure can deliver what investors are looking for from their alternatives allocation at a lower cost with additional benefits of liquidity and transparency," Kelly Ye, the director of research at IndexIQ, said. The firm was formed in 2006 and bought at the end of 2014 for about $100 million by New York Life. 

The tricky thing is getting hedge-fund managers to buy into the transparency craze. Similar to the industrywide reduction in fees, hedge-fund managers are somewhat at the whim of their largest investors in regard to how much information they need to share. 

Hedge funds agreed to some additional transparency regulations after the financial crisis and Bernie Madoff's high-profile Ponzi scheme, but "we haven't seen very much industry consensus around extending" it to retail-fund levels, said Nick Eisenlau, the head of Citco's institutional services, one of the biggest middle- and back-office service providers for hedge funds and other alternative-investment managers. 

Established hedge funds, he said, are not interested in joining platforms like HedgeMark. 

Read more: Hedge-fund investors want a deal on fees. Managers don't start negotiating until the check hits $120 million.

For his part, HedgeMark's Lapkin acknowledges the challenges of getting competitive and secretive managers — some that don't even have a website — to join. "There often is trepidation to go down this path" from managers, he said. 

But institutional investors that are able to make large enough investments to make joining a managed-account platform worthwhile for a manager have become more sophisticated and can actually do something with the extra information they get, Eisenlau said. 

"There is an expectation of data services and underlying portfolio information now" because sophisticated investors have the technology and analytics capabilities to synthesize it, he said. These same large investors are also under tremendous pressure to meet their own deadlines and goals, like underfunded pensions that desperately need to close the gap.

Those investors, industry observers say, need to be able to review which of their managers are actually producing alpha. At Titan Advisors, which invests for pensions and endowments, the big concern is crowded trades, where managers are all chasing the same return.

"We are seeking out funds that make money and don't follow the crowd," Herman Laret, the director of global macro, commodity trading advisers, and multistrategy for Titan Advisors, said at the Greenwich Economic Forum this week. 

In the end, Lapkin said, the best managers should all want more transparency.

"The extra transparency should show how talented you are," he said. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Hedge fund Whitebox quietly became a major lender to gunmaker Remington after banks stepped away

$
0
0

A man aims a Remington firearm at the annual National Rifle Association (NRA) meeting in Dallas, Texas, U.S., May 4, 2018. REUTERS/Adrees Latif - RC19E76FC3D0

Whitebox Advisors LLC, a credit-focused hedge fund, has been quietly capitalizing on Wall Street's ambivalence toward gun manufacturers by replacing some banks as a lender to Remington Outdoor Company.

Whitebox, whose assets under management have grown from $2 billion to $6 billion in the last six years, became a major lender to Remington this year, according to people familiar with the transactions that allowed it to build its position.

Minneapolis-based Whitebox refinanced a $193 million loan to Remington that had been provided by seven banks, according to the sources. Many of the banks have been under pressure from their customers and some politicians to sever ties with the gun industry.

Remington, the maker of an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle used in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting of six adults and 20 children in 2012, filed for bankruptcy in 2017 amid declining gun sales. It exited bankruptcy last year, but still faces a lawsuit from the families of the Sandy Hook victims in the US Supreme Court over its role as a gun manufacturer.

Whitebox's investment in Remington illustrates how some hedge funds, whose investors include pension funds, financial institutions and high-net-worth individuals, do not share the same reputational concerns as many banks. It also underscores the emergence of hedge funds as "shadow banks," replacing traditional lenders to companies.

"Given the baggage of these particular loans for banks that are public companies, it is an invitation to hedge funds to get in and relieve the bank of an asset they don't really want to hold," said Campbell Harvey, a professor finance at Duke University. "A hedge fund is a private entity, it doesn't need to answer to public shareholders."

Whitebox, which was a creditor of Remington before it filed for bankruptcy, first stepped in to replace Bank of America as a lender last year, according to the sources.

The bank had vowed it would stop financing "military-style" weapons during Remington's bankruptcy, after a former student of a Parkland, Florida, high school massacred 17 people with an assault rifle in February 2018.

Whitebox bought Bank of America's $43.2 million portion of a $193 million asset-backed loan to Remington at a discount to its face value, one of the sources said. That left six other banks still participating in the loan.

Whitebox doubled down on its investment this spring, helping Remington refinance the asset-backed loan, the sources said. The loan, which Remington arranged as part of its bankruptcy last year, had a three-year maturity, and it is not clear why Remington pursued the refinancing.

The loan that WhiteBox extended has dibs on Remington's assets, protecting Whitebox in any future debt restructuring, one of the sources said.

Whitebox is now the only holder of that loan, that source added.

Whitebox declined to comment.

Previously, Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo & Co, as well as regional banks Synovus Financial Corp, Regions Financial Corp, Fifth Third Bancorp and BB&T Corp, had held portions of the loan.

A Wells Fargo spokesman declined to comment specifically on Remington, but said "the bank has not picked a side in the gun violence prevention debate like some of its big bank peers."

"We do not believe that the American public wants banks to decide which legal products consumers can and cannot buy," the Wells Fargo spokesman said.

Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, Regions Financial, Synovus Financial, Fifth Third and BB&T all declined to comment. Remington did not respond to a request for comment.

Some 30 potential lenders turned down Remington for bankruptcy financing in 2017, many citing public backlash against firearms as the reason, according to a bankruptcy court document at the time.

Private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management LP, which lost control of Remington in the bankruptcy, had promised to divest the company following the Sandy Hook shooting, but ended up only allowing some of its buyout fund investors to exit their position.

JPMorgan Asset Management and Franklin Templeton Investments, which were previously Remington's biggest creditors, became its owners following the bankruptcy.

Whitebox assets

Whitebox has not financed a gunmaker other than Remington, one of the sources said. The hedge fund has been stepping up its bets on distressed debt, and has been involved in the restructuring of Puerto Rico's debt, department store Sears' bankruptcy and gaming company Caesars Entertainment Corp.

Whitebox's longest-standing fund has seen annualized returns of more than 16% since inception, according to one of the sources. Its founder, Andy Redleaf, stepped down this year, passing the baton to senior portfolio managers Rob Vogel and Paul Twitchell.

Remington still makes AR-15-style weapons that are lightweight and known for their "hair-splitting" accuracy, according to its website. Some of the guns are marketed for hunters of coyotes, foxes and bobcats.

The gun company continues to face a challenging retail environment, with one of its biggest outlets for sales, Walmart Inc, saying this year it would stop selling ammunition for handguns and some assault-style rifles in its stores.

Join the conversation about this story »

Carlson Capital's latest investor letter reveals market-lagging flagship funds, and insiders say 2 more portfolio managers have jumped ship

$
0
0

Clint Carlson

  • Carlson Capital's two multi-strategy funds — Black Diamond and Double Black Diamond — have returned just 2.5% and 1.4% this year through the end of October, an investor document shows. 
  • The firm has also lost two portfolio managers recently, including real-estate investor Matt Adams and healthcare PM Rob Gupta, who joined Millennium.
  • Its hedge fund assets overall stand at roughly $4.8 billion — roughly 40% less than the $8.2 billion the firm began 2018 with. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

Carlson's tough 2019 continues. 

To start, the firm has seen a string of investment talent departures. It's the latest in what has been a volatile few years for Clint Carlson's 26-year-old hedge fund, which has included a roughly 40% drop in assets since 2018 to $4.8 billion as of the end of October.

Real-estate portfolio manager Matt Adams, healthcare portfolio manager Rob Gupta, managing director Narvir Sidhu, and mortgages trader Gary Helene have all left the firm in the last couple of months, sources tell Business Insider.

Gupta has joined Millennium's Arch Rock Management, while Sidhu is now a portfolio manager for Segantii Capital Management in London, according to their LinkedIn profiles. The departed employees either did not respond to requests for comment, could not be reached, or declined to comment. 

And the Dallas-based hedge fund manager's two flagship multi-strategy funds — Black Diamond and Double Black Diamond — finished October up 2.5% and 1.4%, respectively, for the year so far, according to an investor letter. Meanwhile, the average hedge fund has returned more than 7% and the stock market is up double-digits. 

Carlson declined to comment. 

A source close to the firm said that Carlson Capital has around 150 people total at the moment, and recently hired Adam Bernstein and Greg Thomas as portfolio managers.

Bernstein had spent 10 years at Glenn Dubin's Highbridge before starting his own fund, Pagoda Asset Manager, in 2014; he rejoined Highbridge in 2018. Thomas ran the Blackstone-backed Carbonado Capital before joining Carlson. 

The firm's assets have tumbled over the last three years, as the fund was plagued by poor performance in 2017 and key personnel departures in 2018 and 2019. After starting August of 2017 with $9.1 billion in AUM, Carlson Capital lost nearly $1 billion in assets in the last five months of that year. 

The firm's performance did bounce back in 2018, a year where the average hedge fund lost money thanks to a  fourth-quarter whipsaw in markets. Both flagship funds were up, returning roughly 2.5% each, but the firm also saw departures of its head of fixed income, chief risk officer, and treasurer during 2018. 

This year, Carlson Capital saw investors redeem from its stock-picking Black Diamond Thematic fund after one of the fund's portfolio managers, Matthew Barkoff, left the firm in January. The fund's assets have dropped more than 90% from its peak of more than $1 billion in 2017, an investor document shows, with current assets at $71 million. 

The firm's hedge fund assets overall stand at roughly $4.8 billion — about 40% less than the $8.2 billion the firm began 2018 with. 

While the firm's flagship funds have lagged competitors like Citadel, Balyasny, Millennium, Point72, and others this year, its single-strategy funds, including the aforementioned Black Diamond Thematic, have outperformed the firm's mainstays. 

The event-driven option, known as Black Diamond Arbitrage, has made 4.59% so far this year. Black Diamond Relative Value is up 8%, and Black Diamond Thematic has been the best out of all the funds, with a 10.24% return.  

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

A longtime recruiter for Igor Tulchinsky is leaving WorldQuant to start his own business, sources tell us

$
0
0

Igor Tulchinsky

  • Manu Bakshi, a managing director at WorldQuant focused on recruiting, is leaving the Millennium-connected manager after nearly eight years, sources tell Business Insider.
  • Bakshi will start his own venture, a source familiar with the situation told Business Insider.
  • WorldQuant's recruiting efforts have changed the way many hedge funds think about sourcing quant talent. Founder Igor Tulchinsky has pushed to find people in parts of the world that have not traditionally been a hedge-fund hotbed. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

WorldQuant is losing a longtime recruiter, sources tell Business Insider, as managing director Manu Bakshi is set to leave the firm soon.

Bakshi, who was with Igor Tulchinsky's firm for nearly eight years, is planning to start his own firm, sources tell Business Insider. Prior to working for WorldQuant, Bakshi was London-based recruiter Harvey Nash, according to his LinkedIn. 

Bakshi did not respond to requests for comment, while a spokesman for WorldQuant declined to comment. 

WorldQuant has a global recruiting team, and has changed the way many hedge funds think about finding talent, especially quant talent. Tulchinsky, who founded WorldQuant in 2007 while he was a portfolio manager for Izzy Englander's Millennium, is from Belarus and has offices in 18 different countries. The firm's website states that the firm has more than 750 people. 

The firm also hosts a platform known as the WorldQuant Accelerator that allows for quants anywhere to submit their strategy with the hopes of using WorldQuant's infrastructure so the investors can focus on their algorithms and not running a business.

The goal, Tulchinsky said in an interview with Bloomberg in 2018, is to take any "intuition" out of investing.

"The more models you have and the better the models are, the less you need to rely on intuition. Today at WorldQuant, we have millions of alpha signals, so we don't need to use intuition very much. That's the goal," he said in the Bloomberg interview. 

The firm still runs billions for Millennium along with capital that Tulchinsky's firm has raised for a separate fund.

While quant funds have exploded in both number of managers and assets, a collapse in momentum stocks earlier this year had many concerned that performance would be underwhelming for the year. To ease concerns about potential impact on bonus payments, WorldQuant sent a company-wide email in September guaranteeing employees at 75% of last year's bonus. 

SEE ALSO: WorldQuant's Igor Tulchinsky just guaranteed his team 75% of last year's performance bonus to soothe nerves as quant funds get slammed

SEE ALSO: Hedge funds are getting swamped by alternative data. Some want to fast-track how they buy it and focus back on trades.

SEE ALSO: Izzy Englander just landed a quant team that was managing hundreds of millions for billionaire Michael Platt

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Viking's former investment chief is gearing up to launch his own fund in mid-2020 and join the long list of Tiger Management grandcubs

$
0
0

Andreas Halvorsen

  • Ben Jacobs, the former co-chief investment officer at Viking Global, is in the process of starting his own fund, which sources tell Business Insider will be named Anomaly Capital. 
  • Jacobs is following in the path of Daniel Sundheim and other Viking standouts in starting his own fund. He spent more than a decade at O. Andreas Halvorsen's shop.
  • Jacobs hopes to launch in the second half of 2020 and is currently in the process of building out his investment and business development teams. It is unclear much capital he plans to raise.
  • Industry insiders told us that expectations are high for a big launch. Sundheim raised $4 billion for D1 Capital Partners, which began trading in 2018. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

The Tiger family tree continues to grow. 

Ben Jacobs, Viking Global Investors' former co-chief investment officer, is planning to launch his own fund in New York, which will be named Anomaly Capital, sources tell Business Insider. He left Viking in June. 

A source close to Jacobs said he is currently in the process of building out his investment and business development teams, and that he is going to be the CEO and CIO of the new firm. 

It is unknown how much money Jacobs is looking to raise but he plans to begin trading in the second half of 2020. There is a recent precedent for the ex-Viking executive to follow for a big launch: Daniel Sundheim raised $4 billion for D1 Capital Partners, which began trading in 2018, after he worked at Viking for 15 years.

Jacobs' rise to the upper ranks of billionaire O. Andreas Halvorsen's fund — one of the most successful funds founded by Tiger Management founder Julian Robertson's former analysts — mirrors Sundheim's, as Jacobs progressed from analyst to portfolio manager to co-CIO over a ten-year run.

He and Ning Jin became co-CIOs when Sundheim left the firm in 2017 to start D1. Jin became the sole CIO for public equities in June when Jacobs left the firm. 

Jacobs joined Viking in 2009 after spending five years at Blackstone, according to his LinkedIn profile. 

Jacobs could not be reached for comment. Viking declined to comment on whether it will be supporting the new fund, but a source familiar with the firm's thinking told Business Insider that Viking is not in the business of backing other hedge funds. 

Jacobs will join a long list of Viking alumni — considered Tiger Grandcubs by industry watchers because of the extended connection to Robertson — that have gone on to start their own fund.

Just since 2013, Sundheim, Jeff Eberwein, James Parsons, Steve Rosenberg, and Paul Enright have all launched their own funds. Former analyst Steve Mykijewycz is planning to launch a fund focused on real estate and consumer stocks with $200 million in 2020, Hedge Fund Alert reported this summer.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.


Hedge funds are losing to private equity in a tug-of-war over investors' portfolios, and experts say it's only going to get worse

$
0
0

tug of war

  • Hedge fund performance has bounced back this year after a disastrous end to 2018, but institutional investors are still dropping them from their portfolios in favor of private equity, according to a study by EY.
  • The "lackluster demand" for hedge funds is tied to performance troubles and high fees — two longtime pain points for investors — as well as competition from other products in the alternatives space.
  • The EY study found a disconnect between hedge fund managers' priorities and those of their investors. For example, growing assets was the top priority for most hedge fund managers who were surveyed, while investors' top priority was cost rationalization.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Hedge funds are in danger of playing second fiddle to private equity in their biggest investors' portfolios.

A study from EY released Wednesday surveyed 62 institutional investors with $1.8 trillion in combined assets and found they were replacing their hedge funds — and didn't plan on stopping soon.

After making up 40% of these investors' alternatives allocation in 2018, hedge funds now make up only 33%. At the same time, private equity has grown its share of the pie to 25% this year from 18%.

"Investors do not expect this trend to change over the next two to three years, having reported that they anticipate their allocation to private equity and real estate products to continue to grow," the report said.

EY noted that performance troubles and high fees had led to less investor interest in hedge funds. Additional factors are competition from other alternative investment options like real estate and private credit. So far this year, the $3.2 trillion hedge fund industry has seen a net loss of $77 billion, according to eVestment.

But a disconnect from investors, as shown by EY's report, may also be costing hedge funds assets. The top priority for a majority of the 102 hedge fund managers surveyed was asset growth and fundraising, while investors said cost rationalization was the top priority they wanted their managers to have.

And four out of every 10 investors said succession planning should be a top-three priority, while only 13% of hedge fund managers said the same.

Investors are "increasingly desiring long-term partnerships with their managers," said Ryan Munson, a partner in EY's wealth and asset management division who was one of the report's authors. Hedge funds' slump has many managers focused on just getting through the short term and "not thinking five to 10 years down the road" the way many pensions are.

More than a decade removed from the financial crisis, investors are looking for "complex, illiquid strategies" that private-equity firms provide, Munson said, as liquidity has become less of a concern.

At the Greenwich Economic Forum last week, Paul Colonna, who runs Lockheed Martin's $80 billion pension plan, told attendees that while 60% of his portfolio could be traded in a single day, he's not thinking about liquidity when making an investment.

"Of all the things I'm worried and concerned about, liquidity is not one of them," he said.

The EY report also found that private equity's internal policies were more in line with investors' values. Nearly two-thirds of investors who invest in sustainable products said a manager's internal environmental, social and governance policy on everything from hiring to investment decisions was "critically important."

On the manager side, firm-wide diversity is lacking at hedge funds more so than in private equity, EY found. Roughly half of private-equity managers had set diversity targets, while only 15% of hedge funds had. Women made up less than 10% of hedge funds' front offices — where investment decisions are made — from a majority of the survey's participants.

Still, neither private equity nor hedge funds have what would be a considered a diverse industry. Only one in every 10 firms, including both hedge funds and private equity, reported that women made up more than 30% of their front office.

"There is quite a ways to go for the entire industry," Munson said.

SEE ALSO: Meet the 8 people with new ideas about data, fees, and tech who are shaking up the $3.2 trillion hedge fund game

SEE ALSO: Hedge-fund investors want a deal on fees. Managers don't start negotiating until the check hits $120 million.

SEE ALSO: What it's like to launch a hedge fund when even the biggest managers are struggling and long-short equity is a 'dirty word'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Stanley Druckenmiller dumped more than 2 million Uber shares, but other tech names like Netflix and Amazon are getting plenty of love from billionaire money managers

$
0
0

stanley druckenmiller

  • New regulatory filings posted Thursday detail the biggest stock purchases and sales from billionaire fund managers in the third quarter.
  • Investors like Stanley Druckenmiller, Carl Icahn, Chase Coleman, and more, made significant changes to their multi-billion-dollar portfolios. Druckenmiller sold more than 2 million shares of Uber in the third quarter. 
  • The hottest buys were well-known tech stocks — Amazon, Netflix — that have been beloved by these investors for years. Chase Coleman's Tiger Global increased its bet on Alibaba as well.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Competitors, analysts, journalists, and more all just got their quarterly peek inside the stock portfolios of the biggest fund managers in the world.

Secretive funds like Chase Coleman's Tiger Global revealed the changes they made to their holdings in the third quarter, and some of the biggest names were very active.

Billionaire Carl Icahn sold off some of his third-biggest holding, Occidental Petroleum, which is currently trading at a low for the year, filings showed on Thursday. Stanley Druckenmiller's family office ditched almost all of its Uber stake, selling more than 2 million shares in the quarter. 

Continue reading below to see some of the biggest moves from the biggest managers. 

Druckenmiller dumps Uber

The most recent headline of a prominent investor dumping the ride-sharing giant came from company founder Travis Kalanick selling more than $700 million-worth of stock.

But billionaire fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller actually sold a majority of his stake before Kalanick made his move.

Filings show that Druckenmiller's family office owned just under 2.7 million shares, worth roughly $125 million, at the end of the second quarter. The latest filings show that he now owns only 166,882 shares, which the firm valued at roughly $5.1 million.

Druckenmiller also sold more than a million shares of Microsoft, which is his family office's biggest holding, and half of his Alibaba stake, which was worth $175 million at the end of the second quarter.  



Tiger Global is a fan of Alibaba

Billionaire Tiger Cub Chase Coleman is known for his tech prowess, and made a big bet on Alibaba, which has seen its stock price bounce up and down all year. 

The fund nearly doubled its stake in the Chinese company in the third quarter, buying more than 3 million shares. Its stake was worth $1.3 billion at the end of the third quarter and was its fifth-biggest holding. 

The firm continued to add to its large Facebook stake in the quarter as well, buying more than 2 million shares. 

 



Paul Tudor Jones' Allergan bet

After surviving the activism of one billionaire fund manager, Allergan was an attractive investment for another in the third quarter.

David Tepper tried to force the drugmaker to split the CEO and chairman role for more than a year, and the company announced it would explore that when current CEO and chairman Brent Saunders left the position. Now, Paul Tudor Jones has piled into the stock, which has struggled in recent years. 

Tudor Jones nearly doubled his stake in the drugmaker, and owned just under $95 million worth of stock in the company at the end of the third quarter. 



D1's Sundheim still loves Netflix

Former Viking Global investment chief Daniel Sundheim told conference-goers in May that he loved Netflix. His portfolio shows he walked the walk.

Sundheim, who runs the nearly $8 billion D1 Capital, added a million more Netflix shares in the third quarter. His total stake was worth $988 million at the end of the third quarter.

He also plowed in Amazon, roughly sextupling his stake, from 66,500 shares at the end of the second quarter to more than 411,000 shares. 

 



Icahn chipping away at his Occidental Petroleum stake

Billionaire investor Carl Icahn shed a chunk of one of his biggest holdings in the third quarter. 

Occidental Petroleum, which is now trading at the lowest price it has all year, made up 7% of Icahn's multi-billion-dollar portfolio at the end of the second quarter, filings show, but he dumped more than 7 million shares of the energy company in the third quarter.

His stake was worth $1.1 billion, as of the end of the third quarter. 



Uber shares plunged 34% last quarter. Here's how many millions some of its largest hedge-fund backers lost.

$
0
0

Uber, IPO

  • Uber's bumpy ride in the public markets continued during the third quarter. 
  • Shares of the ride-hailing giant fell another 34% during the period as investors shied away from growth stocks associated with money-losing companies. 
  • Several of the hedge funds backing the stock held onto their shares during the quarter, absorbing millions in losses on paper. 
  • Here are some of the biggest funds that took heavy losses on their Uber stakes last quarter. 
  • Watch Uber trade live on Markets Insider.

Uber's stock struggled to pick up steam during the third quarter. 

Shares fell 34% during the period, dropping more than 7% in a single day, after bottom-line losses of more than $1 billion overshadowed its third-quarter revenue beat.  

The ride-hailing giant has had a difficult time finding its footing since entering the public markets in May as investors push back on money-losing business models. But that hasn't stopped hedge funds from standing pat with their positions. Some even piled more into the company's shares. 

Hedge funds are required to disclose their ownership stakes in public companies on a quarterly basis through 13F filings. 

Most of the firms included on the list below maintained the size of their stakes in Uber throughout the quarter. One fund added shares, but the value of the stake still fell because of the decline in the company's share price. 

Here are some of the largest hedge funds that got stung by their stakes in Uber during the third quarter, ordered by increasing size of losses.

5. Lone Pine Capital

Shares owned: 3 million 

Value of stake at the start of Q3: $125 million

Value of stake at the end of Q3: $84.8 million

Amount lost: -$40.3 million

Source: SEC filings



4. Tiger Global Management

Shares owned: 6.66 million 

Value of stake at the start of Q3: $309 million 

Value of stake at the end of Q3: $203 million 

Amount lost: -$106 million

Source: SEC filings



3. Coatue Management

Shares owned: 10.46 million

Value of stake at the start of Q3: $485 million 

Value of stake at the end of Q3: $318 million 

Amount lost: -$166 million

Source: SEC filings



2. Viking Global Investors

Shares owned at the start of Q3: 13.37 million 

Shares owned at the end of Q3: 14.5 million

Shares added: 1.1 million 

Value of stake at the start of Q3: $620 million  

Value of stake at the end of Q3: $441 million 

Amount lost: -$178 million

Source: SEC filings



1. Dragoneer Investment Group

Shares owned: 21.26 million

Value of stake at the start of Q3: $986 million 

Value of stake at the end of Q3: $648 million 

Amount lost: -$338 million

Source: SEC filings



A Chicago-based hedge-fund performance coach is recommending a brain-zapping device to calm nerves during market stress. We spoke to one manager who called the gadget 'a huge part of what I do.'

$
0
0

AlphaStim

  • Alpha Stim is a device that sends electricity through the brain with the aim of helping people with depression, anxiety, and insomnia. Chicago-based hedge-fund performance coach Dr. Ken Celiano is also recommending it for traders who want to keep an even keel. 
  • Performance coaches are common in the hedge fund industry, with managers like Point72 founder Steve Cohen employing people like Tiger Woods' former performance coach Dr. Gio Valenti as well as Denise Shull.
  • Business Insider first spotted the device at Essentia Analytics' Behavioral Alpha conference in New York, where Celiano was wearing one while speaking on stage with Shull and other panelists. We wanted to learn more about the lengths traders are willing to go to in order to gain an edge. 
  • "It's a huge part of what I do as a human discretionary money manager. I call it the 'game within the game,'" said hedge fund manager Zach Abraham, who told us he uses the device on the recommendation of Celiano. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

One hedge-fund performance coach believes he's found something that's about to take off with hedge fund managers: A Walkman-looking device that attaches to your earlobes and sends a mild electrical shock through your brain. 

Performance coaches are common in the hedge fund industry, with managers like Point72 founder Steve Cohen employing people like Tiger Woods' former performance coach Dr. Gio Valenti as well as Denise Shull, who had claimed in a lawsuit that the psychologist Wendy Rhoades in the Showtime series "Billions" is based off of her

Business Insider first spotted the device at Essentia Analytics' Behavioral Alpha conference in New York, where Dr. Ken Celiano was speaking on stage with Shull and other panelists. Celiano was wearing the Alpha Stim device during the panel. 

While we did not try the device ourselves, and cannot attest to how it may impact performance, we wanted to learn more about the lengths traders are willing to go in order to gain an edge. The veteran Chicago-based performance coach says he has recommended the device to 20 traders. 

According to the device-maker's website and YouTube channel, Alpha Stim is an FDA-cleared treatment option for people suffering from insomnia, depression, pain, and anxiety.The technology has also been recommended to people with post-traumatic stress disorder, Celiano said.

"It creates that feeling of being even-keel," said Celiano of the device, which he was first introduced to when he was looking for a solution to his symptoms from restless leg syndrome. 

"It gets a person out of fight-or-flight — being able to hold yourself in that state of uncertainty, but stick to a plan or strategy or idea, that's even-keeled."

Cranial electrotherapy stimulation is an FDA-approved method of treating anxiety and other mental illnesses that has grown increasingly popular as people search for ways beyond pharmaceuticals to treat diseases and disorders.

But the idea of this technology being put to use by traders in a high-stress environment is still relatively novel, according to Celiano. He said he reached out to the device-maker to see if there had been an influx of orders for finance purposes, and was told no. 

Still, he thinks the technology could find fans in an industry obsessed with performance. 

"It's a very interesting space to be in, because any way to influence alpha is going to get a tremendous amount of people interested," he said. 

Hedge fund managers have been known to spare no expense to boost returns, with billions being thrown at alternative data and quants with doctorate degrees. Even though 2019 has been relatively kind to the industry — hedge funds have returned a little more than 7% on average — performance has still trailed the overall market, and investors have been leaving in droves.

Private equity, one industry data-tracker found, is going to pick up a large share of the assets leaving the hedge fund space. 

One hedge fund manager that swears by the device is Praxis Capital founder Zach Abraham, who brought on Celiano as his performance psychologist. 

Abraham said he first tried the tool because he needs to keep his stress levels low, because he has Lyme disease, and has had flare-ups caused by high-pressure situations. A founder of high-frequency trading shop Vine Street Trading who plays in the derivatives market, Abraham said he is constantly getting in and out of positions.

"This requires around-the-clock attention to markets and unfortunately you find yourself in a constant state of fight-or-flight. Your nervous system gets overstimulated and it can affect stress, sleep quality, the ability to stay present in other areas of your life," Abraham said in an email to Business Insider. 

The device helps him "stay in the eye of the storm." 

His use of the device is varied, he said, and on heavy trading days, "I'm typically using it regularly  — both in the office during the trading day and in the evening when I'm wanting to relax."

On his six-person team, both his risk manager and his execution trader "aren't afraid to use the Alpha Stim when needed," he said.  

Abraham said he has yet to experience any side effects. The website for the device states that mild skin irritation and electrode burns on the earlobes as well as headaches have occurred. (The website, selling its own product, compares the side effects to those of prescription drugs that are meant to treat different mental illnesses). 

When asked if he would recommend it to competing hedge fund managers, Abraham said no, tongue-in-cheek, because he doesn't want help any rivals, before saying "of course I would."

"It's a high-pressure business — performers in all walks of life need to understand that living in a constant state of fight-or-flight is not good for their health or their life outside of competition," he said. 

"It's a huge part of what I do as a human discretionary money manager. I call it the 'game within the game.'" 

The devices aren't cheap — ones that are send shocks through just the brain go for hundreds of dollars, while more extensive devices that treat pain in other areas of the body are more expensive. 

To Celiano though, the device is just one part that helps investors find their "inner market"— what he considers to comprise "their feelings, their story, their perceptions, how they view the world through their own biases." Regulating emotions can be a big boost to the bottom line, he said. 

"We're still dealing with the human data, which is the stories we tell ourselves," he said. "My mission is to help them know themselves."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

'They're all going to lose all their money:' A hedge fund CEO warns the stock market is brewing a bubble similar to the time bomb that exploded in early 2018

$
0
0

trader worried nervous hands on head

  • A big move higher in the stock market could wipe out traders who are using weekly S&P 500 options to bet against sudden price swings, according to Jim Carney, the CEO of ParPlus Partners. 
  • He finds this trade similar to the exchange-traded notes that profited wildly until volatility spiked in February 2018. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Two big forces dominate the stock market right now: a bullish uptrend that's creating successive all-time highs, and volatility that's nowhere to be seen.

Both trends tend to occur in tandem, as the CBOE volatility index, or VIX, tends to move in the opposite direction to the S&P 500. The VIX closed at its lowest level in more than 13 months on Friday as the stock market hit yet another record high.

While these conditions seem optimal for stocks, the trades they are spurring in the options market are setting off alarm bells for experts who track these more obscure derivatives.  

One such trade is the sale of weekly S&P 500 options, according to Jim Carney, the CEO of ParPlus Partners. His hedge fund specializes in volatility trading and manages $322 million in assets according to its latest regulatory filing. 

The average daily volume of weekly options trading has hit successive annual highs since 2007, according to CBOE data. 

This strategy bets on future gains and is more attractive when the market is in an uptrend and conditions are calm. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway famously sold billions of dollars worth of index options between 2004 and 2008 in a wager that the market will rise over the next 20 years. 

However, this strategy — one of several that bets against price swings — is not without risks. It can implode when volatility jumps and the stock market drops. Additionally, a recent study by IPS Strategic Capital showed that options-selling strategies have made traders no money nearly half of the time since 2018.

"The weekly options trade incredible amounts — but that could blow up," said Carney, who previously led the volatility-trading team at RBC Capital Markets.

He added: "I don't know whether it happens in a month, three years, or ten years. But at some point, you're going to say 'that guy said it was going to blow up' because they're all going to lose all their money at some point. It's just a question of when." 

Echoes of XIV

Carney finds the allure of this trade eerily similar to the exchange-traded products that profited from low volatility until the VIX had its biggest-ever one-day spike in February 2018. That unexpected move erased almost $3 billion in value within a few minutes and forced the termination of the infamous VelocityShares Daily Inverse VIX Short-Term exchange-traded note (XIV). 

Carney says some of his volatility-trading peers who survived that episode have now shifted resources to weekly options trading. But they could be doing so at their own peril. 

"If we get a 6% gap move where they can't hedge, they're in real trouble," he said. "If we get an 11% move, every single one of them is bankrupt and you've got something exactly like the VIX last February." 

Carney declined to disclose the specific trades he has in place to profit from such a blowout, though he indicated that he is not short-selling volatility.

He acknowledged that his hedge fund stands to gain if his view is right. After all, it focuses on volatility trading and profits when the market gets chaotic. 

His unusual fee structure raises the stakes of his views even more: he charges a hefty 33% performance fee, but only if he outperforms the market. 

SEE ALSO: 'It's a very unusual time': The stock market just triggered a flurry of under-the-radar signals that have experts worried a painful meltdown could soon strike

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A big-money investor in juggernauts like Facebook and Netflix breaks down the '3rd wave' firms that are leading the next round of tech disruption

Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>