Quantcast
Channel: Hedge Funds
Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live

A longtime alternative data player just laid off the majority of its staff and its CEO resigned. It might be a sign of tough times to come for a market set to grow to $7 billion.

$
0
0

Greg Skibiski

  • The CEO of Thasos, an alternative data company, has stepped down and roughly two-thirds of its staff have been laid off, sources tell Business Insider. 
  • Thasos was struggling to sell its product, despite the fact that the company was on Bloomberg's alternative data platform and hedge funds are planning to pump more money than ever into the market.
  • The struggles of Thasos might be a sign that the booming alternative data space — which Deloitte projects to exceed $7 billion in 2020 — is not the gold mine some believe it to be.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Thasos Group seemed to be doing everything right. 

Part of the booming $7 billion alternative data industry, the company collects location data from cellphones to help hedge funds make money. 

Founded in 2011, Thasos was worth $42 million, had ties to MIT, and boasted a blue-chip CEO whose prior company Sense Networks was once named the "The Next Google" by Newsweek. Thasos was also part of Bloomberg's newly launched alternative data marketplace, meaning it had a stamp of approval from the data juggernaut. 

But Thasos struggled to make money selling to its main financial services clients and in August was forced to fire two-thirds of its staff, sources tell Business Insider. Its CEO and cofounder Greg Skibiski also stepped down.

Read more:Alternative-data provider Quandl is changing its strategy as industry giants like Bloomberg and S&P push into the $7 billion market

Thasos went from roughly 40 people at the beginning of August to less than a dozen weeks later. Skibiski chose to step down and transition into a "non-executive chairman" role, a Thasos spokesperson told Business Insider, and will still be involved in "managing the day-to-day operations of the firm."

Skibiski even tried to pivot to selling to real-estate firms as a last-ditch play for more sales. The decision also frustrated employees, according to a source familiar with the matter, as they internally lacked the expertise to dive into the new field. 

Thasos said the firm has recently been "broadening the verticals to which they sell," and has "paying customers" in the commercial real estate space.

"Financial services remains a significant market opportunity," the spokesperson said, and a new CEO will "be announced shortly." 

The market is experiencing 'alternative data fatigue'

The problems Thasos faced aren't unique, alternative data industry participants and observers say — while there's no shortage of hedge funds interested in buying data, the market is becoming both crowded and commoditized.

"We may have a bit of an alternative data bubble," Mike Chen, a portfolio manager at PanAgora Asset Management, told Business Insider. "I believe that a lot of the more advanced alternative data users — advanced hedge funds and investors — are probably experiencing what I might call 'alternative data fatigue.'"

Read more: Hedge funds' secret sauce is obscure data like satellite images. Here's how the people in charge of spending millions on this data find the stuff worth buying.

Justin Zhen, cofounder of alternative data provider Thinknum, said that the influx of participants in recent years has made it tough for consumers of alternative data to sort through all their options.

Users of alternative data have previously stated how difficult it is to get a competitive edge from the complex data sets, comparing it to sifting through dirt to find only a few gold nuggets. Coupled with the considerable money and resources a firm needs to invest to bring on and test the data before using it in strategies, sorting through alternative data has become a nearly impossible task. 

"I think the space has gotten really noisy, especially from a data buyer's perspective," Zhen said. "Two years ago there were two dozen vendors and now there are hundreds of vendors. From the data buyers perspective, the hedge funds and asset managers, it's hard for them to know who the worthwhile data sets are to talk to and bring on."

Investors quickly drop feeds they don't see value in

As a result, investors have gotten more aggressive with how quickly they'll move on from a data set, making life more difficult for the original companies that made the industry buzzworthy.  

An influx in the amount of options means data sources might have a limited amount of usage, Nick Tsafos, a partner at EisnerAmper who works with hedge funds on their data strategies, told Business Insider.  

"What [hedge funds] are saying is we need data points of the things we are interested in today, and we don't know what we are going to be interested in the future," he said. 

Some data points have a shelf life — once they're crowded, hedge funds move on.

See more:Hedge funds are getting swamped by alternative data. Some want to fast-track how they buy it and focus back on trades. 

For instance, right now a datapoint that can measure tariff impacts on China would be extremely helpful, Tsafos said. But the current interest from hedge funds can dissipate quickly. 

At the well-known alternative data conference circuit Battlefin, data vendor numbers have gone up to the point where conference organizers need to find a bigger venue for this year's New York leg. Longtime industry player Barry Star, who runs Wall Street Horizon, a data company that organizes and analyzes corporate events, told Business Insider at Battlefin that roughly half of the young start-ups at the conference won't be back next year.

"A lot of folks out there, they're trying to sell the first telephone," Star said. 

Tammer Kamel, the CEO of Quandl, an alternative dataset aggregator that Nasdaq bought at the end of last year, told Business Insider that the entry of S&P and Bloomberg into the space forces everyone to adapt. For Quandl, which was acquired in 2018 by Nasdaq for an undisclosed amount, that means creating their own proprietary data along with licensing exclusive datasets for their platform.

"I like to think it's us staying ahead of the curve," Kamel said. "We were one of the pioneers in this space ... For us to continue in a leadership position, we've got to be on to the next thing."

Some believe there is still money to be made in alt data

To be clear, there are still those that still see plenty of opportunity within the alternative data space. Atit Amin, an associate at venture firm Pivot Investment Partners, told Business Insider the struggles of one company aren't indicative of the entire market. Pivot, which makes early growth equity investments, recently led alternative data player Earnest Research's $15 million Series B

"I think we are still in the early innings of investment in the alt data space," Amin said. "As long as the move from active to passive continues, it's just going to further the interest in trying to hunt for alpha generating ideas and opportunities. I don't think this is necessarily a black mark on the industry." 

A recent survey of 76 hedge funds by law firm Lowenstein Sandler found that 82% of survey participants plan to increase their alternative data spending. 

Read more: Pricey data, slashed fees, and poor returns are hurting hedge funds' margins —and some are getting in the business of helping their rivals

And while Thinknum's Zhen admitted there will be a culling of the herd, it might still take a while. Despite the amount of data providers that continue to pop up, there are also many traditional investors that haven't even dipped their toe in the alt data waters. 

"There are really big investment funds, and even some banks, that don't quite know what they are doing with alternative data yet," Zhen said. "That lends itself to a much longer runway for vendors to figure things out. ... I think the space is still growing too quickly."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The US women's national team dominates soccer, but here's why the US men's team sucks


Goldman Sachs just completely overhauled how it makes stock forecasts — and its new findings paint a troubling picture for the market

$
0
0

trader nyse upset market crash

  • Goldman Sachs said it has remade its sentiment indicator, and the new data shows stocks are at risk for a near-term decline as hedge funds and foreign investors have ramped up their exposure.
  • Arjun Menon says the new indicator includes far more data and does a better job predicting what the market is likely to do in the weeks ahead.
  • He added that this extreme positioning could remain a challenge if economic growth didn't pick up in the months to come.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Getting a grip on market sentiment can help you figure out where stocks are likely to go next, and Goldman Sachs says it's refined a tool that will allow you to do just that.

Portfolio strategy associate Arjun Menon said the firm tore down and revamped its sentiment indicator to include nine different measurements of how investors were positioned in stocks. In a recent note to clients, Menon said the new sentiment indicator captured more detail and did a better job predicting the market's direction.

As it stands now, the updated indicator shows that the benchmark S&P 500 is on track for a decline of at least 2% in the next eight weeks, he said. If positioning stays the way it is, and the economy doesn't improve, it could pose a larger obstacle for the market in the future.

"The likelihood of a positioning-driven sell-off in the near-term has increased," he wrote. "If economic growth remains modest, extreme positioning could hamper stock returns going forward."

In the past, Menon said, Goldman measured sentiment using data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Now it's complementing that with eight other types of data to get the most accurate picture of how households, hedge funds, active mutual funds, foreign investors, and others are investing.

Combined, those groups own 80% of stocks, Menon said. He said the updated sentiment indicator has been rising for three weeks and was giving off a "stretched" or high reading. Because sentiment is a contrarian indicator, that's a negative signal for stocks.

Menon said net exposure by hedge funds hasn't been this high since July 2018, and demand from foreign investors has risen to its highest level since March.

"Aggregate equity positioning is 1.2 standard deviations above average, indicating that positioning poses a downside risk to S&P 500 returns in the near future," he wrote. Here's what the new sentiment indicator is showing:

Goldman Sachs sentiment indicator

Regression analysis lets Goldman link the positioning data to subsequent market performance dating back to 2008. It says extreme readings like the current ones are a negative indicator lasting five to eight weeks.

Menon added that the additional sources of data gave the new sentiment indicator much more predictive power than the old one, lending more weight to his forecast of short-term declines. He added that the new indicator was more accurate than the old one when positioning is light, and similarly effective when positioning is stretched.

Still, he said the high levels of sentiment weren't necessarily a disaster because if economic growth were to get stronger, it would support higher stock prices. That's what he expects, and he maintains a year-end target of 3,100 for the S&P 500.

SEE ALSO: Famed economist David Rosenberg explains how the Saudi oil fiasco's impact on US consumers could hasten the next recession

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Octopuses are officially the weirdest animals on Earth

Investors want hedge funds to 'stick to their guns' and not try to 'be heroes' as markets get turned upside down

$
0
0

FILE PHOTO: Traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, U.S., August 13, 2019. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

  • Last week's momentum slide and a surge in oil prices earlier this week thrashed many hedge funds.
  • Investors like Jon Aikman, who sits on the University of Toronto's endowment and pension-investment committees, want hedge funds to "stick to their guns" in times of market turmoil. 
  • "If they're just going to sell out, I can get an ETF to do that," Aikman said.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

The markets are causing a panic. But investors are hoping hedge-fund managers trust their process and stick to their strategies. 

A crash in high-flying growth stocks last week smacked momentum-tracking hedge funds, with one US pension seeing its trend-following funds surrender their August gains in a couple days. And a huge spike in crude-oil prices this week hit many funds with bearish views on the commodity. 

The best thing whiplashed hedge funds can do right now is stay the course, Jon Aikman, a finance professor at the University of Toronto, said. He sits on the school's endowment and pension-investment committees, which allocate more than $5 billion. 

He wants hedge-fund managers to "stick to their guns and continue what they are doing."

"If they see dislocation they can take advantage of, go for it, but I don't want to see a big sell-off," Aikman told Business Insider. "If they're just going to sell out, I can get an ETF to do that."

Read more: Hedge funds are getting whacked in an 'unheard of' stock-market shift — and a leaked Morgan Stanley memo warns of possible pain for months

In an email, David Bahnsen, a wealth manager at Bahnsen Group who manages more than $1 billion, said "in times like this, and any other time, our objective with hedge funds is, always and forever, non-correlation."

"An absolute return objective is preferred, but we are never looking for our alternative strategies to 'lean into' volatility or momentum, on either side," Bahnsen wrote.

Likewise, Darren Wolf, who leads Aberdeen Standard Investments' alternative investment strategies group, said he didn't look for managers that "try and be heroes" during times of market stress.

"We try to find managers that think more strategically about what the moves mean and how it may impact the medium-term outlooks for their strategies," Wolf said. 

One hedge-fund manager with total assets in the billions said they tried to explain to investors that drawdowns happen in times like these, adding that "it's how you react to market dislocation that makes a fund." 

Cautious institutional investors like pensions, endowments, and foundations have already pressed hedge funds to think more long-term. Hedge funds' equity exposure meanwhile is at the lowest level in a decade.

On the other hand, hedge funds are under pressure to prove their worth to investors who have complained about the industry's high fees. Many managers are seeing opportunities in the fragmented market.

One hedge fund that focuses on technology stocks was excited for the "reset" of the market for growth stocks, which were hit hard during momentum's slide last week.

Another fund that looks to make money in times of market stress said it usually saw inbounds from potential investors flood in after a serious dislocation.

"Clients always worry when there are unexpected events and market moves. The question is always — has it hurt our portfolio? — fortunately, the answer is no. We're right-sized and we've got hedges in place. We've also been taking advantage of the volatility to add to positions," Michael Hintze, the founder and senior investment officer of the $18 billion fund CQS, wrote in an email to Business Insider. 

Read more: Hedge funds may be getting slammed (again) after oil's shock surge followed a record shift in equities

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Octopuses are officially the weirdest animals on Earth

Goldman Sachs' massive quant business now rivals AQR and Two Sigma. We talked to the bank's top quant about asset growth, finding data sources, and why critics of computerized trading are wrong.

$
0
0

Goldman Sachs David Solomon

  • Goldman Sachs' Quantitative Investing Strategies group is one of the Wall Street bank's biggest and fast-growing units. 
  • The unit, known as QIS, has nearly doubled its assets under management in 2 1/2 years to almost $180 billion. That makes it bigger than most of the quant hedge funds. 
  • That success will help Goldman seize on one of the few secular growth opportunities it has right now: a surge in demand for alternatives investing.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

In 1989, when Goldman Sachs started its computer-led investing group, the term big data hadn't entered the lexicon. 

Yes, engineers were using modeling techniques to explore large datasets. But Silicon Valley had yet to come up with a way to store and parse the growing pile of data created as computers took over every corner of society. Goldman could cast its eye over wide swaths of the investing universe — 13,000 companies — but it couldn't dig too deeply. 

Fast forward to today, and the depth of analysis now possible is a fundamental shift on how Wall Street puts money to work. Gary Chropuvka, the cohead of Goldman's Quantitative Investment Strategies team, which uses statistical methods to invest in public-equity markets, knows this better than anyone. Chropuvka's group has nearly doubled its assets under management in 2 1/2 years to $174 billion.

"As quants, we've always played the breadth game," Chropuvka said in an interview at his 35th-floor office, where a pile of portfolio-management textbooks sat in a corner. "What big data has helped us do is really play the depth game and know more about a company, not just their fundamentals and what's affecting those, but also what's going on around that company."

Chropuvka joined Goldman in 1998, moved to QIS the following year, and assumed his current role in July 2017. He shares management with Armen Avanessians, a former Bell Labs engineer known for pioneering the role of Goldman's deskside strategists and launching its vaunted risk-management system SecDB. They meet to review portfolio returns each Monday.

One of Goldman's fastest-growing businesses 

The business has been on a tear of late, and it now counts among Goldman's biggest and fastest growing. The group's 100 investment professionals managed more than 10% of the assets across Goldman's asset-management unit at midyear. The big-data, or equity-alpha, sleeve accounted for about $45 billion, nearly tripling over the same time period. Smart-beta strategies commanded another $110 billion, while those that tried to mirror traditional hedge-fund strategies had another $19 billion. 

The figures mean QIS can stand shoulder to shoulder with the largest quant funds in the world: AQR manages $194 billion, Renaissance Technologies oversees more than $110 billion, and Two Sigma Investments supervises $60 billion. 

Read more:Goldman Sachs for a long time struggled to win business with quant hedge funds. CEO David Solomon told us 'the picture is very different today.'

That success will help Goldman seize on one of the few secular growth opportunities it has right now: a surge in demand for alternatives investing. Goldman CEO David Solomon has big plans to raise money for the bank's private-equity, real-estate, and hedge-fund strategies. QIS, with its long track record and torrid growth, has a good story to tell and stands to gain from the firmwide fundraising push, even as it has avoided some of the politics that have come with merging other investment teams.  

Quantitative investing is one of Wall Street's hottest trends. Investment managers are increasingly employing enormous computing power and teams of engineers to make money from alternative-data sources like satellite images, credit-card transactions, and information scraped off the web. For those in search of new sources of alpha, the potential is too good to pass up.

Inside QIS, the data crunching has come up with more than 250 signals that can be exploited to make money in the markets. The tally about a decade ago was just 15. The group sorts companies by topics in addition to industry or financial metrics, parses language used in written research reports to gauge analyst sentiment, and analyzes options pricing data collected over the years by Goldman's trading desks, to name just three functions. 

Shadows of the 'quant quake'

The outlook hasn't always been rosy. Goldman's Global Alpha hedge fund, which once managed $12 billion in computer-led strategies, lost 23% in August 2007. It was caught up in what would be dubbed the "quant quake," an event that led to an existential crisis for the industry, and shuttered several years later.

Industry flows didn't turn positive until 2010, according to Hedge Fund Research. But turn positive they did: Quant hedge funds managed $979 billion through June, more than double 2008's tally, according to HFR. They now account for 30% of everything managed by hedge funds.

Read more: The explosive growth of quant investing is paving the way for 'super managers' in the hedge-fund industry

Still, critics persist. The JPMorgan quant guru Marko Kolanovic has blamed recent market volatility on the trend-following strategies of the quants. Other hedge-fund managers have followed suit: Omega Advisers founder and former Goldman partner Leon Cooperman said in December the Securities and Exchange Commission should look into computer trading. Stan Druckenmiller said during the same month that quants were introducing volatility into the markets that could be harmful for other managers.

The theory was tested again last week when a massive shift in the stock market, from top-performing growth stocks to lower-performing names, triggered a sharp shift in "momentum" strategies. While the sharpness of the move reminded some of 2007's quant quake, one quantitative-hedge-fund manager said the industry losses weren't nearly as severe.

While Chropuvka declined to comment on last week's move, he said in the earlier interview that he didn't agree with the criticism. 

Pushing back against the critics

"I struggle with this whole idea, especially around the alpha-crowding piece," Chropuvka said, citing the diversity of strategies that have been brought about by more data. "People have very different decision-making processes. It's not just around momentum, quality, and low vol. Many quants have value-type metrics, which again, usually aren't trend-type strategies that will promote herding. So I think one of the things that quant strategies actually have is diversification."

That will only increase, he said, as new data sources come online. 

So with all this data coming at them, how do the execs in QIS separate the good from the bad? They go looking for raw and unstructured information that hasn't been modified by others and then apply a systematic three-step approach to evaluate its usefulness. 

'A huge edge' 

Step one uses economic intuition — does it make sense? Questions asked at this stage include: Can the team develop an investment thesis or belief around why it will make money? Where does the data come from? How is it stored? How should Chropuvka's team account for missing database fields? 

Once the data is acquired, step two involves conducting research to see if the thesis holds up. Step three is checking to see if the signal or trend has already been incorporated into prices. After all, the data isn't worth much if the market has already figured it out. 

Read more: Industry insiders are predicting a battle between the biggest hedge-fund names for top quant talent

"It's economic intuition first and foremost," Chropuvka said. "Then it's, 'Does the data prove something?' And then lastly, which is really critical, 'Is that information reflected in prices?'"

One of the biggest hurdles to incorporating all the new data sources into an investment process is simply its cost. Goldman spent more than $1 billion on communications and technology costs, where data and data-license expenses appear, over the 12 months through June.

Even here, Chropuvka has a secret weapon: Where possible, the group shares data licenses with Goldman's traders and investment bankers. 

"To the extent we have a license that spans the firm, and we know people have done their due diligence, we take comfort and we use some of it," he said. "We think that's a huge edge."

Join the conversation about this story »

Nasdaq-owned alt-data seller Quandl just hired BlueMountain's former data buyer to get inside hedge fund clients' heads

$
0
0

Tammer Kamel

  • Quandl, the Nasdaq-owned marketplace for alternative data tracking things like web scrapings and satellite images, is bringing in Evan Reich as its new head of data strategy and sourcing.
  • Reich previously held the same kind of role, only from a hedge fund client perspective, at $18 billion BlueMountain Capital Management. He will be leading a team tasked with fining new datasets for Quandl to sell.
  • Quandl has been focusing more on creating its own data streams instead of just selling other feeds. That comes as Bloomberg and other data giants have started to crowd into the world of alt-data.  
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Quandl had a hole, according to its chief executive and founder Tammer Kamel. 

The platform has been in the business of selling alternative data  — like cell phone-tracked foot traffic and satellite images of shipping barges leaving port — to hedge fund clients. Nasdaq bought Quandl at the end of last year, and now it's eyeing a pivot to actually creating data products in addition to selling others' feeds. 

To do that, Kamel needed someone with hands-on experience in using those kinds of data sets to make investment decisions.

In stepped Evan Reich. 

Reich is Quandl's new head of data strategy and sourcing. He had the same role, only from the perspective of a hedge fund client instead of a data seller, at $18 billion BlueMountain Capital Management before it was bought by Assured Guaranty earlier this year.

Before his five-year stint at BlueMountain, Reich also worked at Izzy Englander's Millennium and Steve Cohen's SAC Capital, managing the hedge funds' massive data and research reserves. In 2017, according to a release from Quandl, Reich was a contributor to the project that won the 2017 Nobel Prize for Physics for research on technology used to see gravity waves. 

The new job entails sourcing fresh data sets to bring to Quandl's clients,  and he's also there to serve as a  "sanity check" on new ideas that Kamel and his team come up with.

"His experience is invaluable," Kamel said in an interview with Business Insider. "Evan knows these problems we are trying to solve for clients — he's been living them for his whole career."

See more:Hedge funds are getting swamped by alternative data. Some want to fast-track how they buy it and focus back on trades.

The alt-data industry, despite rosy projections of growth and high interest from hedge funds and others, is becoming more competitive thanks to the entry of behemoths like Bloomberg, S&P, and Refinitiv. Long-time alt data player Thasos recently laid off a majority of its staff and its CEO resigned.

Kamel has been vocal about remaining ahead of the curve to ensure his company does not get squeezed. 

He told Business Insider in a previous interview that Quandl was going to focus on generating more proprietary datasets as well licensing exclusive datasets that clients will only be able to get from his platform.

"I like to think it's us staying ahead of the curve," Kamel had said then. "We were one of the pioneers in this space ... For us to continue in a leadership position, we've got to be on to the next thing."

Reich's addition brings in a voice that can help judge whether an exclusive data agreement with a vendor will be something that interests the hedge fund clients Quandl relies on.

The transition from hedge fund to data aggregator is not a well-worn career path, and Reich said he was drawn to Quandl in part because of the Nasdaq acquisition. He said the opportunity is "so much greater now" for the firm to lead and innovate in the space because of that institutional backing.

Quandl is "unique in the world, having this sort of platform to find things and bring them to market — it's really an extension of what I was already doing," Reich said. 

See more: Hedge funds' secret sauce is obscure data like satellite images. Here's how the people in charge of spending millions on this data find the stuff worth buying.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We did a blind taste-test of KFC and Popeyes fried chicken — here's the verdict

A performance coach for Tiger Woods and billionaire Steve Cohen told a room full of investors how to learn from big mistakes — advice that may come in handy after recent market mayhem

$
0
0

Gio Valiante

  • At a CFA Society event on Thursday night, Dr. Gio Valiante and Denise Schull told investors and traders that many people haven't trained themselves to correctly learn from mistakes. 
  • Mistakes can't be punished by the brain, but instead need to be seen as learning opportunities, said Valiante, who works with investors at Steve Cohen's Point72, including Cohen himself. 
  • "It's not about making mistakes, it's about catching them before they kill you," said Svein Backer, the managing director of global equities for Lockheed Martin's $72 billion pension, at the CFA event. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Investing is a career path that will inevitably knock you down.

The problem is most finance pros aren't learning the right lessons from those mistakes, according to Dr. Gio Valiante and Denise Schull, two performance coaches well-known in the $3.3 trillion hedge fund industry. 

At an event at the CFA Society in Manhattan Thursday night, Valiante and Schull, along with Lockheed Martin's managing director of global equities Svein Backer, touched on the importance of behavior and emotion, and their impact on a portfolio. 

According to Valiante — who is currently working with Point72 founder Steve Cohen and his team and has worked with Tiger Woods in the past — the two traits constantly "under attack" as an investor are confidence and motivation.

"Most successful people are, to a degree, a little overconfident," Valiante said. The key is to train your brain to not be overly critical of your mistakes, he and Schull said. 

"So many of us are concerned about being wrong when it's just a part of the job," said Schull, who founded the ReThink Group and has been said to be the model that "Billions" character Wendy Rhodes is based off of (a lawsuit Schull filed earlier this year against Showtime and the show's creators was thrown out). 

Managers might need to learn these lessons quickly after the whiplash caused by momentum's slide and oil's rise over the last two weeks. Investors and managers have told Business Insider that they need to stick to their guns, and trust in their strategy in times like these.

 See more: Hedge funds are getting whacked in an 'unheard of' stock-market shift — and a leaked Morgan Stanley memo warns of possible pain for months

Backer, who helps manage Lockheed Martin's $72 billion corporate pension and was a client of Schull's, pressed attendees to not be afraid to cut losses early, while also being willing to buy back in at a higher price if your intuition was wrong.

"It's not about making mistakes, it's about catching them before they kill you," he said. 

What lets Backer think like this, Schull said, is the fact he is now "inoculated against being wrong." Schull and Valiante said that the brain should shift from punishing mistakes to learning from mistakes.

Fear, the two performance coaches said, is not always the best motivating factor. 

"Everyone is too self-critical," Schull said. 

See more: Billionaire Leon Cooperman says the rise of passive investing 'scares the hell' out of him because it's left the market vulnerable to sharp, unpredictable sell-offs

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nxivm leader Keith Raniere has been convicted. Here's what happened inside his sex-slave ring that recruited actresses and two billionaire heiresses.

Hedge funds could reap as much as $250 million from the collapse of British tour operator Thomas Cook

$
0
0

thomas cook airport stranded

  • While the bankruptcy of British tour operator Thomas Cook has left hundreds of thousands of travelers stranded, a group of hedge funds are poised to make as much as $250 million from the company's collapse. 
  • Funds including Sona Asset Management and XAIA Investment owned derivative investments called credit default swaps, which pay investors when a company can no longer service its debt, Bloomberg said in a report.
  • The company entered into compulsory liquidation on Monday after efforts to restructure it's debt with key investors failed, according to a statement
  • Visit the Markets Insider homepage for more stories.

The bankruptcy of British tour operator Thomas Cook has left hundreds of thousands of travelers scrambling to find a way home — but a handful of hedge funds could walk away with hundreds of millions in profits. 

Investors including Sona Asset Management and XAIA Investment could earn as much as $250 million on credit-default swaps on the embattled company, according to Bloomberg.

The products are a type of derivative instrument that pay investors when a company can no longer afford to service its debt. They're often used by investors to bet against struggling companies that are teetering on the brink of bankruptcy.

Thomas Cook entered into compulsory liquidation on Monday after weekend negotiations to restructure the company's debt with key shareholders fell through. 

The payouts on Thomas Cook's default swaps still requires approval from the Determinations Committee, a panel of traders that oversees aspects of the global derivatives market. The group is set to meet on Monday to determine whether Thomas Cook's bankruptcy filing should initiate payouts on the swaps, Bloomberg found.

Read more: The 'single biggest risk' to investors is being widely ignored — and Morgan Stanley warns it could spawn a recession within months

"We have worked exhaustively in the past few days to resolve the outstanding issues on an agreement to secure Thomas Cook's future for its employees, customers and suppliers," CEO Peter Fankhauser said in a statement on Monday. "An additional facility requested in the last few days of negotiations presented a challenge that ultimately proved insurmountable."

Trading of Thomas Cook shares was suspended on Monday after the company filed for liquidation. Creditors including Lloyds and the Royal Bank of Scotland demanded the firm find an additional $250 million in funding by this week. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is the shortest route for a road trip across the US to see 50 national landmarks

A top hedge fund's reported $800 million bet on vaping could be in jeopardy as regulators set their sights on e-cigarettes

$
0
0

NJOY E-cigs

  • Jason Mudrick, the founder and chief investment officer of Mudrick Capital Management, has placed a massive bet on the vaping and e-cigarette space. 
  • The high-profile investor's flagship fund has invested nearly $800 million — close to 30% of the firm's total assets — in e-cigarette maker NJOY Holdings, according to a report from Bloomberg
  • The investment has powered most of the fund's 30% return this year, Bloomberg found. But Mudrick's prized stake in the e-cigarette maker could be in jeopardy as the future of the industry is being called into question by regulators. 
  • Policymakers and regulators alike are warning an underage-vaping epidemic could be spreading as vaping-related lung diseases have killed eight people across the US and affected more than 500 others. 
  • Visit the Markets Insider homepage for more stories.

As regulatory pressure ramps up against vaping and e-cigarettes, a top hedge fund's $800 million bet on the space could be in trouble. 

Mudrick Capital Management — a hedge fund founded by high-profile investor Jason Mudrick that manages about $2.8 billion — has close to 30% of its total assets invested in e-cigarette maker NJOY Holdings, according to a report from Bloomberg

The firm's $800 million stake in NJOY has fueled most of its flagship fund's 30% return this year, Bloomberg found. Mudrick's flagship fund invests in distressed companies on the verge of or recovering from bankruptcy.

The fund purchased a 51% stake in NJOY back in 2017 when the company was worth $40 million and fresh out of bankruptcy, according to Bloomberg. The size of the stake has dropped to about 40% after Mudrick sold some shares to earn back its initial investment. 

Mudrick's stake in NJOY was the sole driver of the its 25% return in the second quarter, and without the investment the fund would have posted a loss for the period, Bloomberg reported.

The fund's outsize returns this year stand in stark contrast the fund's competitors in distress investing, according to data compiled by HSBC. The year-to-date average for distressed funds is 5.59%, the bank said in a report. 

Read more: 'Invest in what's scarce': Famed economist David Rosenberg explains how the average trader can supercharge returns in a tumultuous market

But Mudrick's investment could be in jeopardy as the vaping industry comes under greater scrutiny amid a growing number of vaping-related deaths and diseases.

The Trump administration shocked the industry last week after announcing it would work toward removing almost all flavored e-cigarette products from the market. The Food and Drug Administration still needs to approve the effort. 

Top Juul investor Altria has lost about $30 billion in market value since the FDA launched an investigation into a potential link between Juul's products and users experiencing seizures. 

Bloomberg found that the recent scrutiny of vaping threw a wrench in NJOY's efforts to raise new funding. The company was recently looking to raise new capital at a valuation of as much as $5 billion, more than double what NJOY was valued at during a funding round in May.

NJOY abandoned the fundraising effort as the regulatory pressure began heating up on the industry, according to the report.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map shows where American accents came from


Wall Street's Democratic donors reportedly warned that they'd back Trump over Elizabeth Warren

$
0
0

elizabeth warren

  • Wall Street's Democratic donors are warning that they won't back Sen. Elizabeth Warren if she wins the party's nomination and that they might even support President Donald Trump, according to CNBC.
  • "You're in a box because you're a Democrat and you're thinking, 'I want to help the party, but she's going to hurt me, so I'm going to help President Trump,'" a senior private-equity executive told CNBC.
  • Warren has said she plans to break up the big banks, crack down on private equity, and regulate executive pay if she becomes president.
  • View Markets Insider's homepage for more stories.

Wall Street's Democratic donors are warning that they won't back Sen. Elizabeth Warren if she wins the party's nomination and that they might even support President Donald Trump, according to CNBC.

"You're in a box because you're a Democrat and you're thinking, 'I want to help the party, but she's going to hurt me, so I'm going to help President Trump,'" a senior private-equity executive told CNBC.

Warren, a vocal critic of big banks, has said she plans to crack down on the financial industry if she becomes president.

In response to CNBC's tweet promoting its story, she said that "wealthy donors don't get to buy this process" and vowed that she "won't back down."

Warren tweet

The Massachusetts senator's presidential plans include breaking up the big banks, dividing commercial and investment banking, and forcing private-equity firms to shoulder debts and pension costs tied to businesses they buy.

She said she also intends to get rid of sweetheart tax rates, protect workers when their employers go broke, penalize bankers for failed risky investments, and reverse the Trump administration's deregulation of the financial industry.

"To raise wages, help small businesses, and spur economic growth, we need to shut down the Wall Street giveaways and rein in the financial industry so it stops sucking money out of the rest of the economy,"Warren wrote in a Medium blog post in July.

Warren appeared to top the latest CNN/Des Moines Register/Mediacom poll with 22% support among likely Iowa caucus voters, outstripping former Vice President Joe Biden's 20% share; the poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. Three-quarters of those surveyed said they held a favorable view of her, and the poll found that 32% of her supporters were "extremely enthusiastic," compared with 22% for Biden.

Her recent momentum means that among wealthy Democratic donors and fundraisers in business circles, the idea of withholding support and potentially switching to Trump "is becoming widely shared," CNBC reported.

Bank executives and hedge-fund managers "will not support her," a big-bank executive told CNBC, adding that Warren's policies would be worse for the industry than President Barack Obama's changes.

"It would be like shutting down their industry," the executive said.

Wall Street executives are saying that Warren "has got to be stopped," Jim Cramer said on CNBC's "Mad Money" this month.

In response to the video, the senator tweeted, "I'm Elizabeth Warren and I approve this message."

Warrren tweet2

The prospect of Warren revealing Trump's tax cut to be a gift to the wealthy has also turned Wall Street off Warren, a hedge-fund executive told CNBC.

"I think if she can show that the tax code of 2017 was basically nonsense and only helped corporations, Wall Street would not like the public thinking about that," the executive said.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Stewart Butterfield, co-founder of Slack and Flickr, says 2 beliefs have brought him the greatest success in life

A hedge fund manager who oversees $2 billion lays out the road to profitability for Uber and Lyft — and explains why they have a unique bull case compared to WeWork

$
0
0

Glen Kacher

  • Uber and Lyft have created a duopoly in the US ridesharing market that puts them on the road to profitability, according to Glen Kacher, the chief investment officer and founder of $2 billion Light Street Capital.
  • Kacher juxtaposed their business models with WeWork's to illustrate why they should not be lumped together with other unprofitable tech companies that are tapping the public markets for capital.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

It would not be far-fetched to formulate an overarching bear case against the slew of unprofitable companies that are going public. 

You could even invoke the dreaded b-word: bubble. High-profile companies like Uber and Lyft are raising money through initial public offerings this year at the fastest pace since the height of the dotcom boom in 2000, according to Bloomberg data.

Peloton's stumble in its first trading session Thursday — the third-worst mega-IPO debut since the financial crisis — spotlighted these money-losing companies once again.

But instead of generalizing, Glen Kacher — the chief investment officer and founder of Light Street Capital— would rather study each company's fundamentals to unearth the strong long-term bets.

He is bullish on two companies that fit the bill of the tech-startup mania: Uber and Lyft. Lyft's stock has tanked 47% since its IPO while Uber has fallen 24%. Uber reported a $5.2 billion loss in the second quarter and Lyft bled $644 million in the same period. 

Despite these numbers and the concerns of other investors, Kacher sees a road to profitability for both companies.

"Yes, absolutely" was his response when asked to confirm that he was invested in both companies at CNBC's recent Delivering Alpha conference.

He added: "We look at ridesharing and say, 'the end market is huge.'"

Read more: The managing partner of Andreessen Horowitz explains why his firm is investing in a budding technology that 'will be applied in almost every area'

Besides the size of the addressable market, Kacher sees an advantage that other parts of the sharing economy do not have. 

To drive home his point, he singled out WeWork, the shared-office company that was once one of the most valuable startups in the US but had to postpone its IPO after intense scrutiny of its business model and executives.

"If you rent a room that has five desks for your startup, there's not that much pooling efficiency," Kacher said.

He continued: "Those five desks are only used by your employees. But in an Uber or a Lyft situation, that car drives around multiple cities in a day and may have 15 or 20 riders ... that's a very unique economic solution as opposed to WeWork that's just carving a floor up into very tiny little spaces."

Kacher also sees the ridesharing market in the US as a well-oiled duopoly. Led by Uber, both companies are flexing their pricing power and raising fares to try and offset their losses.

Lyft is inadvertently benefiting from the fact that Uber is fighting in ridesharing and food-delivery markets outside the US, Kacher said. Lyft is really only playing in "one and a half markets"— the US and Canada — but can also improve its margins by following Uber's lead and raising prices, he added.  

Light Street, which manages $2 billion in global technology assets, had invested in both firms before they went public. The stakes are worth nearly $137 million, data from regulatory filings compiled by Bloomberg show. 

SEE ALSO: The 'single biggest risk' to investors is being widely ignored — and Morgan Stanley warns it could spawn a recession within months

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nxivm leader Keith Raniere has been convicted. Here's what happened inside his sex-slave ring that recruited actresses and two billionaire heiresses.

Citadel just cut a team managing more than $1 billion after an analyst and a data scientist broke internal compliance rules about trading in personal accounts

$
0
0

Ken Griffin

  • The analyst Josh Lingsch and the data scientist Derek Allums were fired by Citadel after they broke one of the firm's rules for trading in personal accounts, sources told Business Insider.
  • They were a part of a nine-person team in Texas that was focused on energy investments.
  • Jarrad Bourger, the portfolio manager of the team, was fired because of performance reasons unrelated to the compliance issue, a source close to the firm said.
  • The team managed more than $1 billion, and the portfolio was liquidated after Lingsch and Allums were dismissed.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Citadel has liquidated a portfolio with more than $1 billion in energy investments run out of Texas after the analyst Josh Lingsch and the data scientist Derek Allums were fired from the firm this week for violating the firm's rules around trading in personal accounts. 

The team of nine people was the worst-performing team at Citadel this year of the more than 30 portfolio groups in the firm's global-equities business, a source close to the firm said. Some members of that now shuttered team have now joined other teams at the firm. Citadel manages a total of $32 billion. 

Sources said the team did perform well during the recent oil spike, when the price of crude jumped nearly 20% and hit many hedge funds that had made bearish bets on the commodity

The precise nature of the two people's trading violations in their personal accounts could not be determined, and the firm declined to comment when asked about the details of the infractions. 

Jarrad Bourger, the portfolio manager for the group, was fired for performance reasons, the same source told Business Insider, but was not involved with the compliance violations.

"Citadel has always had a strong, robust culture of compliance, and we expect all of our employees to act with the highest levels of integrity," a spokesperson for the hedge fund said in a statement. 

Read more: Ken Griffin's Citadel is losing a longtime money-manager and the COO of its Global Equities business

When Citadel sent out an email to employees about the liquidation of the portfolio and the dismissal of the majority of the team, an email from the compliance department followed shortly after, sources told Business Insider. The email from compliance was a reminder of the rules around trading in personal accounts. 

According to his LinkedIn profile, Lingsch had been with Citadel for almost two years, previously working as an analyst for Arete Investment Group in Austin, Texas, for more than four years. Allums had been with Citadel for less than a year, working previously for Point72 as a research analyst on the healthcare team and as a vice president with the venture-capital arm of Steve Cohen's firm. Both did not respond to requests for comment. Bourger could not be reached for comment. 

The firm's flagship fund, Wellington, is up 14.2% for the year through the end of August, besting many of the firm's multistrategy peers. The average hedge fund, according to Hedge Fund Research, is up 7.8% through the first eight months of year. 

Read more: Humans are beating machines, and Pershing Square and Greenlight are crushing it. Here's how hedge funds performed in the first half.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nxivm leader Keith Raniere has been convicted. Here's what happened inside his sex-slave ring that recruited actresses and two billionaire heiresses.

WorldQuant's Igor Tulchinsky just guaranteed his team 75% of last year's performance bonus to soothe nerves as quant funds get slammed

$
0
0

Igor Tulchinsky

It's been a tough year so far for quant funds, but WorldQuant employees can breathe a little easier now. 

Regardless of how the Millennium spin-off's performance shakes out for 2019, quants, researchers, investors, and more who work for Igor Tulchinsky know that their bonuses can shrink only so much.

The quant platform, which manages more than $7 billion, sent out a company-wide communication recently confirming that employees would receive at least 75% of last year's performance bonus this year.

A source close to the firm told Business Insider that the goal of the guarantee was to calm employees who are worried about getting paid in a year that has been tough on quants.

Read more: Izzy Englander just landed a quant team that was managing hundreds of millions for billionaire Michael Platt

The firm declined to comment. WorldQuant's performance isn't often broken out from Millennium's overall performance, which is up about 6% through the end of July. The firm's flagship was up nearly 5% last year, when the average hedge fund lost money.

A big part of compensation in the hedge-fund industry is typically tied to performance bonuses on top of base salaries. That can mean big paydays in good years, but relatively leaner pay checks when fund performance is weak.

Quant funds have had a rough year. Traditional stock pickers like Pershing Square and Greenlight Capital have dominated, while firms like Renaissance Technologies and Winton Group have been mediocre. More competition in the quant space has pushed up prices for talent, as well as unique datasets. 

WorldQuant has tried to push down the costs for alternative data by running a platform that lets data providers come directly to them instead of going through an aggregation platform or a data buyer. 

Read more: Alternative-data player Thasos just laid off the majority of its staff and its CEO resigned. It might be a sign of tough times to come for a market set to grow to $7 billion.

The collapse in momentum stocks earlier this month also hit many quants that took bearish bets on traditional value stocks while piling onto well-performing equities. 

"Everything that worked all year got sacked and whacked," one quant told Business Insider earlier this month. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The US women's national team dominates soccer, but here's why the US men's team sucks

Cliff Asness' AQR has placed bets against Adyen and Worldline, two of Europe's biggest players in the buzzy payments space

$
0
0

Cliff Asness

  • AQR is betting against one-time unicorn Adyen Global, a Dutch payments company, and French payments company Worldline, according to data company Breakout Point.
  • The two short positions are worth a combined $175 million — roughly 0.5% of the firms' combined market caps. 
  • AQR is the second hedge fund to take a big short position in Adyen, Breakout Point's data show, but hedge funds and investors in general have not bet against the growing payments space. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories. 

Payments company Adyen Global's soaring stock price — it's up more than 50% since it went public last June — has attracted another short-seller.

AQR, which runs more than $190 billion across its hedge funds, mutual funds, and other products, recently shorted the company, according to data company Breakout Point which tracks short positions in European companies. This follows a $115 million bet against the company by Mapleline Capital in February

The fund and Adyen declined to comment.  

It's at least the second big short position AQR, which is a systematic manager that uses algorithms to determine its investments, has made in the payments sector. Breakout Point's data show that AQR also has a $71 million short on French payments company Worldline, which it made in August. No other hedge fund has a current short position this big in either company. 

Worldline did not respond to requests for comment.

See more: $183 million short-seller Spruce Point is targeting the maker of Trojan condoms and Arm & Hammer baking soda

AQR has not always been negative on the prospects of the growing European payments space, records show. These are the first short positions they have taken in the space, according to Breakout Point. 

The firm doesn't do traditional fundamental reviews of companies, instead investing based on different factors in the manager's algorithm-led strategies. AQR also made bets against companies linked to Woodford Capital, the fund run by Neil Woodford that blew up over illiquid investments earlier this year. 

See more: Citadel is the among hedge funds piling into shorts bets on European banks as record-low rates crush financial firms

SEE ALSO: Emerging markets, M&A, and new services: here are the key trends to watch in the fast-changing payments space

SEE ALSO: Cross-border payments startup TransferWise just inked its first US bank partnerships, including one with digital bank Novo. We chatted with its CEO about the launch, and why an IPO is still far off.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We did a blind taste-test of KFC and Popeyes fried chicken — here's the verdict

A banker revolution against Brexit is brewing in London's leafy stockbroker belt

$
0
0

Boris Johnson, a leadership candidate for Britain's Conservative Party, looks on during his visit at Wisley Garden Centre in Surrey, Britain, June 25, 2019. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls

  • A London hedge-fund manager who lives in the Esher and Walton constituency in the county of Surrey has been hard at work trying to unseat local member of Parliament, Dominic Raab. 
  • Known as the stockbroker belt, Esher and Walton has been stronghold of the Conservative party for decades. Brexit may be changing all that. 
  • "We're looking at a political earthquake here," says Raab's challenger, Monica Harding, in an interview. 
  • "Raab is my MP, but I can't vote for him," an executive at a large US investment bank told Business Insider.

A leafy town on the outskirts of London that's home to some of the City's top bankers and hedge fund managers is an unlikely hotbed of political revolution. 

But one nonetheless may well be underway.

In the Esher and Walton constituency in the county of Surrey – a stronghold of Britain's Conservative party for decades – a London hedge-fund manager has been hard at work volunteering, recruiting neighbors, and donating cash to unseat the local member of Parliament, and Britain's current Foreign Secretary, Dominic Raab. 

The fund manager, who spoke on condition of anonymity citing fears of pro-Brexit backlash from clients and colleagues, is a resident in the district, where property prices average at around £759,000 ($935,000). He balances his efforts, he told Business Insider, with a day job managing about $2 billion from his fund's office in the City.

He is supporting Raab's challenger, Monica Harding of the Liberal Democrats, the only major British political party that has openly said it wants to stop Brexit and remain in the European Union.

Last month, the fund manager said he attended a meeting with economists and strategists at a big investment bank in London. It was supposed to be a roundtable discussion about the global trade war. The subject instead swerved to the fund manager's trip to attend the Liberal Democrat party conference in Bournemouth.

'Cheering around the conference room'

"They started cheering around the conference room," the fund manager said of the reaction to his Bournemouth trip. "It was supposed to be a lunch with China expert. The first third of meeting was everyone grilling me," about the conference.

At stake is the Brexit threat to the fate of the City — London's financial industry is the British economy's cash cow and supports about 1 million jobs. Raab, who also serves as First Secretary of State under Johnson, backs the prime minister's "no deal," leave-at-all-costs stance. It's an unpopular position in Esher and Walton, which backed 'Remain' in the 2016 Brexit referendum by 60% to 40%. 

"We're getting seven new members per day in Esher and Walton, and a huge amount are working in financial services," Harding told Business Insider in an interview. "We've raised, in the past two months, more than we've raised in the last two to three years, and the money is coming from the people you're describing," in hedge funds, banks, brokerages, and other City firms, she said.  

monica harding

Harding said: "It's a huge revolution. We're looking at a political earthquake here."

However, polling numbers aren't quite as bullish. Raab has a majority of somewhere around 25,000 votes and the seat is number 58 on the party's target list for the next election, requiring a swing to the Lib Dems of more than 20% from the last general election. The latest polls suggest that nationally there has only been a swing to the party of around 12%.

It's a long shot by any measure. And as yet there is no date scheduled for an election. 

The stockbroker belt 

Esher and Walton area is part of a ring of towns and villages around London known as the stockbroker belt, due to the large number of City workers who commute into the capital from there.

National polling suggests the Liberal Democrats are likely to have leapfrogged the Labour party, who were the previous main challengers in Raab's seat.

Labour, who were once darlings of City figures during the leadership of former prime minister Tony Blair, now struggle to find support among banker types. Not helping them win over Remainers in the City is the fact that Labour's leader, Jeremy Corbyn, has taken an ambivalent position on Brexit, refusing to say whether his party would campaign for or against leaving the EU in a second referendum.

'They don't want to lose their jobs'

The UK press is rife with headlines about "disaster capitalists" lobbying for Brexit while positioning themselves for profit. But a recent Financial News survey of more than 40 hedge fund managers found that, contrary to public opinion, most don't support Brexit.

"The pound will decline, the economy will have a recession, the banking system will be catatonic, the housing market will crash, the far right will rule, and everything will suck," the hedge-fund manager said.

Harding said the sentiment behind the "huge groundswell" of support for her can be summed up more simply: "They don't want to lose money, and they don't want to lose their jobs."

"In any Brexit, 1,600 jobs will be lost in Esher and Walton, we think it will be more than that," she said. "If they do lose their job, it's taking longer to find a new job. They worry about paying their school fees, or not being able to afford the fees." 

At first, "we didn't even think to campaign in the big gated communities," she said. But since, "floors have flung open and they're inviting me for tea and coffee, and they want to give me money, because they're incensed at the current government."

Britain's Conservative party has held on to power in the area since it was established, but there are signs of shifting sentiment. The Tories lost three seats in a May local election in Elmbridge, in Surrey, including one to Liberal Democrat Ashley Tilling.

Tories 'paid the price'

The Tories "unfortunately paid the price for the chaos that's going on at Westminster — the fact that we've not yet sorted out Brexit," the leader of the Elmbridge Conservatives, James Browne, told SurreyLive after the May vote outcome.

"There were a lot of residents who told us yesterday that they were not going to vote Conservative this year," he said.

The hedge-fund manager echoed the comments: "Opinions are changing," he said, especially among what he called called "low-tax Tories reluctant to defect to the Lib Dems but are appalled at the current government."

"Raab is my MP, but I can't vote for him," a separate London-based executive at a large investment bank told Business Insider, citing the government's handling of Brexit.

Brexit supporters are rife

If it is a revolution, it may be a small, localized one. Elsewhere in the City, Brexit supporters are rife. 

"I know a few Remainiacs in the City who have lost the plot," over what they assume will be catastrophe for the City because of Brexit, another London banker, who does not live in Surrey but in another leafy commuter town, told Business Insider. "But most seem pragmatic and grateful for a bit of volatility. It's tricky to make money in very low-vol markets because nobody trades."

Even if the Lib Dems never take power in Esher and Walton, change is afoot. 

Over a glass of distractingly delicious Rioja at a private members club in Mayfair, the hedge-fund manager described 10 of his neighbors — "die-hard Tories their whole life," he said. "When I advocated a pro Lib Dem stance on a community chat six months ago, these same 10 were berating me because they were Tory."

"Now, they are nicer and put up signs" supporting the Lib Dems, he said. "They didn't apologise, though."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what airlines legally owe you if you're bumped off a flight

Hedge-fund investors want a deal on fees. Managers don't start negotiating until the check hits $120 million.

$
0
0

cash

  • The hedge-fund industry's notoriously high fees have been pushed down as managers have been more willing to negotiate. But talks start only with the guarantee of a big check, according to data from eVestment.
  • To lower management fees, a $119 million check was required on average. To cut performance fees, the cost was even higher — $133 million.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Everyone has a price. For hedge funds, that number includes a lot of zeros. 

Investors in the $3.3 trillion hedge-fund industry have been adamant about pushing down fees, especially as performance has struggled to match the overall market, and large-scale investors like pensions and endowments face pressure to lower costs. 

And hedge funds have mostly come down from the once ubiquitous 2% management fee and 20% performance fee structure, with averages now roughly 1.4% and 16%, respectively, according to Hedge Fund Research. 

But these cuts are often tied to a big commitment, according to data from a new study from the research firm eVestment. Managers require, on average, a $119 million investment to cut management fees. The price goes up to $133 million for performance-fee reductions. That's about double the average investment in hedge funds, according to eVestment. 

Read more: Meet the 8 people with new ideas about data, fees, and tech who are shaking up the $3.2 trillion hedge fund game

"To start really negotiating, you need to be writing checks north of $100 million," said Kris Kwait, co-chief investment officer of Commonfund, a $25 billion manager for endowments, pensions, and foundations. 

Commonfund has pushed the hedge funds in its portfolio to adopt a fee structure with no management fees and high performance fees because "it's really all about how much alpha they can deliver."

"Our most expensive managers are our favorites because they generate the most alpha," Kwait said. 

There is still room in the industry for smaller investors looking for a deal — they'll just have to take a risk to get it.

For instance, family offices are often big backers of emerging managers that don't yet have a track record for pensions or endowments to invest in and can push for a discount, said John Culbertson, the chief investment officer for Context Capital Partners, which invests in hedge funds on the behalf of family offices. 

Read more: What it's like to launch a hedge fund when even the biggest managers are struggling and long-short equity is a 'dirty word'

Culbertson believes investors get too hung up on the front-facing fees and don't look at the whole picture. For example, pensions have told him that they couldn't invest in certain well-known funds because of their fees, despite their long track records of outperforming the market without any correlation to the stock market.

"The industry is, at times, overly focused on gross fees that they pay versus the net returns that they receive," he said.

"There's a bit of an obsession around fees," he added.

But some investors are constrained by fiduciary concerns or political pressures. Wilmington Trust, which runs more than $90 billion and invests in hedge funds, has an "intense focus on keeping fees low" because of the firm's fiduciary duty to investors, Matt Glaser, the firm's head of equity, alternative investments, and manager research, said. 

Fortunately, for an investor as large and old as Wilmington Trust, managers are willing to make it work.

"We have access advantages because of our size and our brand," he said. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Amazon is reportedly seeking a new space in New York City. Here's why the giant canceled its HQ2 plans 5 months ago.


Saba Capital is targeting a unit of Legg Mason in an activist campaign. Another Legg Mason business stands to profit if it's successful.

$
0
0

boaz weinstein

  • Boaz Weinstein's Saba Capital, a $1.7 billion hedge fund, has taken activist positions in closed-end funds run by large asset managers like BlackRock and Neuberger Berman with the hopes that new board members will increase the price the funds trade at. 
  • Saba is targeting two closed-end funds run by Western Asset Management, which is owned by the $750 billion manager Legg Mason. 
  • Legg Mason, however, is also backing Saba in its fight against its own asset manager, thanks to its ownership of EnTrust Global, a $20 billion fund of hedge funds and one of Saba's biggest investors. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Boaz Weinstein's latest activism campaign in closed-end funds has affiliates of the $750 billion asset manager Legg Mason on opposite sides of the proxy fight.

Weinstein's Saba Capital, a $1.7 billion hedge fund, is trying to place new board members on two funds run by Western Asset Management, which is owned by the Baltimore-based Legg: the $679 million Western Global High Income fund and the $891 million Western High Income fund.

The fight between the two sides has included the sharp elbows and choice words common of activist campaigns — Western wrote to the stockholders of the Global High Income fund that the fund "is simply the latest fund that [Saba] is targeting for a quick profit."

"Saba Capital has engaged in 16 proxy contests since its inception in 2009 and currently maintains minimal to no holdings in many of the funds it has previously targeted," the letter reads in bold print. Saba, in its Securities and Exchange Commission filing announcing the stake it took in the funds, wrote that Western's board structure — which Saba says protects incumbents — "is strong proof that the board is not acting in the best interests of its shareholders."

Read more: WorldQuant's Igor Tulchinsky just guaranteed his team 75% of last year's performance bonus to soothe nerves as quant funds get slammed

But what is unique to this fight is that those would stand to benefit from a Saba victory include investor EnTrust Global, a $20 billion fund of hedge funds that is owned by Legg Mason. 

Saba's campaigns led to a legal fight with BlackRock, and Neuberger Berman has said that Saba's activism violates the decades-long law that governs retail funds, but this is the first time Weinstein has gotten support from one side of a manager and pushback from another.

In a statement, Legg Mason said that its affiliates were free to invest in what they believe is the best option for their clients. 

Read more: D.E. Shaw is going to trial over the sale of a litigation finance portfolio company, shining a light on a side-pocket deal at the secretive hedge fund firm

"If EnTrust Global sees value in investing in or alongside Saba for their client base, that's an independent decision they would make. Western, also with investment independence, believes that they are proactively taking many steps to manage that fund on behalf of all of the closed end investors that invest in it, and they are making that case in the Saba matter, with shareholders and others," the statement reads. 

EnTrust and Saba declined to comment. 

Weinstein, who was the cohead of credit trading at Deutsche before starting Saba, has made activism in closed-end funds, which trade on exchanges like stocks, a more common occurrence. Asset managers however claim the fund's technique harms retail investors, who are often invested in closed-end funds for the income earned from distributions instead of the discount from the share price. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Violent video games are played all over the world, but mass shootings are a uniquely American problem

Hedge funds have billions on the line at PG&E's bankruptcy hearing — and equity-holder Seth Klarman is pitted against bond-holder Paul Singer

$
0
0

camp fire destruction

  • Pacific Gas & Electric, the bankrupt California utility that's been found partially responsible for causing two of the state's devastating wildfires, has been a target for dozens of hedge funds. 
  • In a bankruptcy hearing on Monday, a judge will decide between a deal put forth by the equity holders, which would benefit Seth Klarman's Baupost Group, and a settlement from bond holders, led by Paul Singer's Elliott Management and supported by victims of the wildfires. 
  • Major shareholders in the company agreed to an $11 billion Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan in early September that would have paid out funds like Baupost and TPG that held insurance claims at a premium, but that plan no longer has support of wildfire victims.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.  

The final decision in the sprawling multi-billion-dollar bankruptcy of Pacific Gas & Electric will make some well-known hedge fund managers very happy, and ruin the years-long work of others. 

The California utility that was found partially responsible for some of the state's recent massive wildfires had the backing of its major shareholders — including David Abrams' Abrams Capital, John Paulson's hedge fund, Fidelity, and dozens of other managers — for an $11 billion Chapter 11 plan that would have paid out insurance claims at a rate that would make Seth Klarman's Baupost Group hundreds of millions.

Baupost owns more than $3 billion in insurance claims that the Boston-based manager would have been paid back 59 cents on the dollar for under the bankruptcy plan — double the amount of what the firm paid for some of the claims.  

But the plan has been challenged by another high-powered group of hedge funds and asset managers, led by Paul Singer's Elliott Management and Pacific Investment Management Company, who own the utility's bonds. They have put forward a bankruptcy proposal where the group of bondholders would pump $29.2 billion into the company to take control of it — and basically push the equity-holders out of the equation. 

One important group representing the victims of the wildfires has made its allegiance known. It has sided with bondholders, under a plan in which $14.5 billion would go to those who lost homes, cars, and loved ones in the natural disasters. 

The company, hoping to fend off the challenge from Elliott's bondholder group, said late last week that it had lined up more than $34 billion in debt financing commitments from banks like JPMorgan, Bloomberg reported.  

The latest iteration of the saga will play out on Monday, when Judge Dennis Montali is set to rule on whether both plans would be able to move ahead. Below is a rundown of the funds that will be hanging on his every word. 

The equity heavy-hitters

Two of the biggest equity-holders in the company — hedge funds Abrams Capital and Knighthead Capital — own nearly 40 million shares of the utility between them, and have formed a separate group known as the Jones Day group, as they are being advised by the well-known law firm.

Originally, the group used to include Redwood Capital, and the three funds were looking at returns in the hundreds of millions in April after the stock jumped up to $23 a share on news of a restructuring proposal. The stock is currently trading at less than half of that. 

Abrams Capital is run by David Abrams, a former protege of Seth Klarman when Abrams worked at Baupost. Now, Abrams and Knighthead are the leading proponents of the bankruptcy proposal that would net Klarman hundreds of millions thanks to the insurance payouts. 



The rest of the stockholders

The stockholders that are not a part of the Abrams-Knighthead duo include some big shots in their own right — like billionaire John Paulson, whose firm owns more than 2 million shares.

Other funds include mutual fund giant Fidelity, D.E. Shaw, BlueMountain, HBK, Centerbridge Capital and roughly two dozen more.

The biggest shareholders other than Abrams Capital, according to bankruptcy filings, are Baupost Group, which owns 24.5 million shares, and Anchorage Capital, which owns more than 21 million shares. 

See more: $21 billion hedge fund BlueMountain Capital has upped its bet on PG&E, the utility that's crashed 60% since the California wildfires. Here's why.



Baupost's big bet and the other owners of insurance claims

Baupost may have taken some hits on its large equity stake in the California utility, but, if the equity-holders' plan goes through, the firm will make hundreds of millions on the insurance payout.

The manager led by billionaire Seth Klarman owns $3.4 billion in subrogation claims, according to bankruptcy filings, more than any insurer or manager. Private equity firm TPG Sixth Street Partners owns nearly $400 million in claims, while insurers like State Farm and Farmers Insurance Exchange own billions each in claims. 

Klarman has added to the amount of claims Baupost owns since the first quarter. Records for California agencies show Baupost owned $2.5 billion in claims at the end of March — which is $900 million less than what the firm owns now. 

 



Elliott, PIMCO, and the wildfire victims

The fight is between asset classes — bond-holders versus equity-holders. And the bond-holders are not lacking for star power. 

Leading the fight for the bond-holders is Elliott Management, the $38 billion hedge fund founded by Paul Singer. The firm owns $1.4 billion in senior utility notes and is well-known for its prowess in the courtroom. 

Other firms include mutual fund managers like PIMCO, which owns $2.1 billion in senior utility notes, and hedge funds like Dan Loeb's Third Point, Ken Griffin's Citadel, and Howard Marks' Oaktree.

Citi, Deutsche, Capital Group, Apollo, Angelo Gordon, Farallon and many others are also a part of the high-powered bondholders group that is hoping to give $14 billion to victims and $11 billion to insurance agencies, and give bondholders a controlling stake in the company when it emerges from bankruptcy. 

PG&E accused Elliott and the bondholders of "attempting to manipulate and profit from the chapter 11 process," when the plan was laid out at the end of September. 

"The Elliott proposal would enrich bondholders by paying them interest well in excess of what is required by law, resulting in billions in unnecessary costs being borne by PG&E customers," PG&E's statement reads. 

The bondholders, though, have the most sympathetic group in the bankruptcy on their side: the wildfire victims. After supporting the equity-holders at first, a group representing the victims now supports the bondholders' plan, which pays victims billions more than the equityholders' plan. 



BlueMountain is shuttering its flagship hedge fund, and cofounder Stephen Siderow is leaving. The struggling firm will be almost entirely out of the hedge-fund game.

$
0
0

Andrew Feldstein BlueMountain

  • BlueMountain is winding down its 16-year-old flagship fund, the $2.5 billion BlueMountain Credit Alternatives Fund, to focus on its collateralized-loan-obligations business for its new corporate owner, Assured Guaranty. 
  • BlueMountain cofounder Stephen Siderow will also leave the firm at the end of the year, the firm said in a statement. 
  • The manager, which just a year ago was running several different hedge-fund strategies, has pulled back from the space in just 10 months.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

BlueMountain — which has been a major player in the hedge-fund game for more than 15 years — is winding down its flagship fund, BlueMountain Credit Alternatives. 

Affiliated Managers Group recently sold its majority stake in the struggling firm to the bond insurer Assured Guaranty, which also purchased the remaining equity in the manager. BlueMountain closing the credit fund marks a huge retreat from the highly competitive hedge-fund industry. 

The credit fund, which launched in 2003 and manages about $2.5 billion, was the centerpiece of a hedge-fund portfolio that used to include a systematic long-short equity fund and a discretionary stock-picking fund that the manager also shuttered this year. With the $160 million sale to Assured Guaranty, BlueMountain is focusing its efforts on its CLO line, which already manages billions.

"Consistent with the firm's investment strengths, BlueMountain plans to launch new
strategies aligned with the firm's focus on collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) and structured finance.
Such strategies will include the areas of CLO equity tranches, as well as asset-backed securities focused
on private debt investments in specialty finance companies and assets," the manager said in a statement. 

The flagship fund will be wound down completely by the fourth quarter of 2020. The statement said the fund had delivered 177% cumulative net returns since 2003, with an annualized return of 6.7% after fees. A source familiar with the situation told Business Insider that about 8% of the assets within the fund were from BlueMountain insiders — about $200 million. 

Cofounder Stephen Siderow, who launched the firm alongside investment head Andrew Feldstein, will also leave by the end of the year, the firm said in the statement. 

"This is the right time for me to consider new opportunities across my business and philanthropic interests. I'm delighted to see BlueMountain begin a new chapter as part of Assured Guaranty, and I'm confident in their vision for the business. I feel very fortunate to have had the opportunity to build BlueMountain with Andrew, whom I consider to be one of the great investors of our generation," Siderow said in the statement.

Press releases after BlueMountain's sale had noted that Siderow would be a president of BlueMountain, while Feldstein would become the chief investment officer of Assured Guaranty's new asset-management unit. 

Read more: $21 billion hedge fund BlueMountain Capital has upped its bet on PG&E, the utility that's crashed 60% since the California wildfires. Here's why.

BlueMountain, known for its credit-investing prowess, struggled in the hedge-fund game once it expanded beyond its core strategy. While Feldstein is widely respected for his bets against his former employer JPMorgan in its London Whale trade — which netted BlueMountain hundreds of millions in returns — the firm could not keep up with multistrategy behemoths like Citadel, Millennium, and Point72, despite investing in talent and technology to support equity strategies. 

Affiliated Managers Group, the onetime majority investor in BlueMountain, had to write off a $415 million expense earlier this year because of BlueMountain's struggles, though AMG executives said the firm was on the path to profitability after cutting the equity strategies to focus on its credit roots. But then the firm's head of fundamental credit, Omar Vaishnavi, was reported to be leaving the firm, despite recently representing the firm onstage at a conference

The firm's expansion into CLOs made it an attractive buy for Assured. An investor presentation by Assured on BlueMountain after the acquisition was announced focused less on the firm's hedge funds and more on the CLO line that doubled to about $12 billion over the past five years. 

"Continue to issue multiple CLOs per year in both the US and Europe," the presentation said in a section titled "Go Forward Focus." 

The Credit Alternatives Fund has struggled to keep up with this year, losing money in a year when the average hedge fund has returned nearly 7%. Records show the fund hasn't returned more than 6.1% in a year over the past five years. The manager plans to continue to run its $580 million Global Volatility hedge fund, a source close to the firm said. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nxivm leader Keith Raniere has been convicted. Here's what happened inside his sex-slave ring that recruited actresses and two billionaire heiresses.

We talked to 24 people about the hedge-fund wunderkind at Elliott who wants to shake up AT&T. Here's why management should be terrified.

$
0
0

att campaign 2x1

  • The latest campaign for the Wall Street hedge fund Elliott Management is a big one, taking on the well-known American staple AT&T. The man in charge of pushing the massive company to make the changes the $38 billion fund sees fit is 39-year-old Jesse Cohn, the billionaire Paul Singer's right-hand man. 
  • Other than Singer himself, Cohn is the person most responsible for the transformation of Elliott from a distressed-situations specialist to the sprawling institutional behemoth it is today, with a separate private-equity arm and billions ready to be deployed for a new activist campaign.
  • Cohn's tactics have included shrewdness and aggression in the 100-plus campaigns the Long Island, New York, native has run for Singer.
  • Business Insider talked to more than two dozen of his colleagues, competitors, detractors, and friends, who said Elliott's rise mimicked Cohn's own personal rise in the firm and in corporate America.
  • Sources told Business Insider that Cohn, and Elliott's activism as a whole, were transforming as the firm positions itself as a long-term investor.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Jesse Cohn has been behind some of the ugliest shareholder tussles and boardroom battles in history during his 15 years at Paul Singer's Elliott Management.

His strategy of purchasing stock en masse and then demanding an overhaul of a company's business has provoked f-bombs from the Detroit businessman Peter Karmanos and paranoia from Athenahealth founder Jonathan Bush — the cousin of George W. Bush — that Cohn had him followed and photographed.

Now the 39-year-old — who is hooked on HBO's "Succession"— is setting his sights on his biggest target yet: the telecom giant AT&T.

Those who have worked on the other side of some of his 100-plus campaigns at Elliott say his track record should strike terror in the hearts of AT&T management, pointing to an uncanny ability to affect change at companies, including layoffs, cost cutting, and ousters of CEOs.

"I wouldn't want to be [AT&T management]," one longtime adviser to companies' boards of directors said. 

In September, Cohn sent 23 pages to AT&T's board of directors, criticizing everything from the company's failed attempt to acquire T-Mobile in 2011 to its $67 billion acquisition of DirecTV — a move, he wrote, that produced "damaging results." 

At the same time, Cohn proposed cuts, saying AT&T's organization was "unnecessarily complicated and inefficient, including a management layer that can be streamlined by reducing spans and layers and title proliferation."

Only a week later, AT&T's CEO Randall Stephenson publicly addressed Cohn's observations at a New York conference, acknowledging some of what Cohn outlined "makes a lot of sense." And, according to The Wall Street Journal, AT&T has begun exploring a split from DirecTV. 

An institutional Elliott

The saga unfolding at AT&T is Cohn's latest work, set on a much grander stage than he has ever stood — a new peak for the $38 billion hedge fund's top lieutenant, because of the company's size and influence, that he's been building to.

A review of his career should be required reading for AT&T's board: From falling into finance as someone who didn't know what he wanted to do in his early 20s to becoming Paul Singer's attack dog on some of his most influential campaigns, Cohn has developed a reputation as a feared investor with the means to change America's blue-chip corporations.

Conversations with more than two dozen of his colleagues, competitors, detractors, and friends also reveal an evolution. Cohn has developed a more diplomatic touch, as his targets have become larger and overhauls need approval by long-term shareholders, such as BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. 

People close to Cohn say he has gradually developed relationships with these large Wall Street investors, who hold key votes in any contest over how a large company is managed. He's on the boards of public companies, like Citrix and eBay, that he led campaigns on, as well as those of private companies that Elliott's private-equity arm has bought outright. 

Chris Cernich, who once advised these large investors on how they should vote on some of Elliott's biggest proxy fights, including with the oil and gas company Hess, went so far as to say Cohn is perhaps the perfect exemplar of how Elliott has become the most institutional of activist investors.

Elliott "is one of the only activist funds that is not an alter ego of the founder," he said, as it maintains a corporate structure, with nine management-committee members around Singer. At the same time, its investments have increasingly been packaged as a play for the long-term good of a corporation.

This gives Cohn even more influence when he goes after a company like AT&T. 

Cohn almost didn't join Elliott

Fifteen years ago, Cohn almost didn't join Elliott. 

After spending two years on Morgan Stanley's mergers and acquisitions team, Cohn began to look for hedge funds to join, accepting an offer from Elliott, which was then focused only on distressed situations. Cohn then later received an offer from a more "established fund," according to Ray McGuire, his boss at Morgan who is now a vice chairman at Citigroup.

It came as no surprise that Cohn had options. 

Originally a native of the Long Island hamlet Baldwin, New York, Cohn was a computer whiz kid in his youth, attending programming camps in the summer and earning a certification from the software programmer Novell for his coding abilities before he could drive. (Years later, he pushed Novell to sell itself for more than $2 billion to Attachmate, where Cohn joined the board.)

He went to the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, where he was a part of a literary society, and graduated in 2002, when he started working for McGuire and the prolific Wall Street dealmaker Paul Taubman at Morgan Stanley. There he helped make connections in the software and technology space that he eventually made his mark on at Elliott, sources said.

At Morgan, McGuire said Cohn and fellow analyst Arta Tabaee, now a managing director at Clearlake Capital Group, were always around, constantly popping into his office with new ideas. McGuire described Cohn as fearless and "summa smart."

The idea of joining Elliott ultimately prevailed. After talking his decision over with McGuire, Cohn decided to stick with his gut.

"I think that was an early defining moment for Jesse, to honor his commitment," McGuire, who is still in touch with Cohn today, said.

In the subsequent years, the triathlon enthusiast would build Elliott's activism unit from scratch, with a focus and energy that is unnerving to opponents and endearing to colleagues. He finds it difficult sitting still at his desk and often needs to take a break to walk through Central Park, according to those who have worked with him, bringing colleagues with him to strategize about their next investment.

The birth of Elliott's activism

Cohn started Elliott's activism unit in 2005 with a small investment in the switch maker and Cisco competitor Enterasys Networks, which he pressured to sell, doubling Elliott's investment in the process. 

The initial investment in Enterasys was only $15 million, but to Cohn, it was huge, according to people close to him. He took a shine to hunting down the inner details of a business, cold calling customers, employees, and engineers in the switch-making industry for insights. The company had loyal customers, but its products weren't reaching enough people, he concluded.

His career purpose began to take shape: He loved improving companies.

Soon, a whole swath of other small tech companies came in to Cohn's sights. He thought they had compelling products, but their stocks were underperforming. So he amassed stakes in their businesses, approached their management, and told them they were doing it wrong. Oftentimes, it wasn't pretty.

In 2006, Harry Knowles was the CEO of the bar-code systems maker Metrologic Instruments. After Metrologic underperformed that year, Knowles said Cohn approached him in an annual shareholder meeting and told him he would have to step aside and sell the company.

"He said, 'Hey, let me talk to you,'" Knowles said. "You don't have any choice."

Knowles, then in his 70s, thought he was getting old for the job. He cooperated with Cohn in selling Metrologic to the private-equity shop Francisco Partners and Elliott for $440 million. The newly installed owners hired another CEO to replace Knowles, who, in turn, fired Knowles' close friends and jettisoned business lines that relied on Knowles' personal involvement. The process was "painful," Knowles said.

It wouldn't be the last time Cohn's pressure on companies would contribute to the fraying of relationships among company management.

By 2012, Cohn set his sights on Compuware, a Detroit-based software company created by the former Carolina Hurricanes owner Pete Karmanos. Karmanos was on his way out of the company after ceding leadership and ready for a happy retirement. But after Elliott bought a stake and pressed for layoffs and cost cutting, he and his newly appointed CEO stopped getting along.

As Cohn bought more and more of the company's stock, multiple expletive-laced arguments broke out between Karmanos and his chosen successor, Bob Paul, over whether to cut costs, including his own retirement parties that would have cost $1.5 million and involved renting out the Detroit City Airport, according to a lawsuit later lodged by Karmanos against his fellow board members.

Karmanos' temperament soured more when Cohn ratcheted up the stakes and made a bid for the Compuware business as a whole at the end of 2012, phoning up Paul and telling him the bid would hit the press in 30 seconds, according to court documents. 

After the board declined the bid, Karmanos told a crowd of several hundred people at a business conference that if he were still in charge, he "would tell the hedge fund to go f--- themselves," according to a lengthy account of the matter in the Detroit Free Press.

Testimony from board members in Karmanos' lawsuit detailed an aggressive approach by Cohn.

They said Cohn had thick files of personal information on each board member with details on which jobs their spouses had and schools their kids attended. He had the files laid out on a conference-room table when the board met with Cohn in Elliott's New York office. Karmanos has said he believed it played a part in intimidating his board into eventually selling.

'We're the aggressors'

Cohn's reputation as an attack dog intensified during his campaign against the healthcare-technology company Athenahealth.

A feature story in The New Yorker detailed his campaign last year against Athenahealth's former CEO Jonathan Bush, who said an anonymous Instagram user had taken pictures of him with a female friend and sent them to his wife. He wondered if Elliott was behind it — something the firm denies. Bush resigned from the company after a London-based reporter discovered details of domestic abuse in divorce filings from more than a decade ago. 

Elliott has repeatedly denied the allegations in the lawsuit and past media reports on the firm's tactics, including any insinuation that it placed the story about Bush's history of domestic violence. But sources said the stories played to the firm's benefit. Boards and lawyers are reticent to fight a firm with Elliott's reputation. The stock price of companies Elliott takes a stake in often jump when a campaign is announced. 

"Part of Elliott's story to their investors and to the media is 'we're the aggressors,'" said J.B. Heaton, a managing member of One Hat Research and a former lawyer that worked on activism cases who has studied activism's effectiveness.

Cohn's ability to create change within an organization has been rewarded by Singer.

A couple years ago, Cohn paid $30 million for a penthouse in Manhattan's financial district that spans 6,000 square feet, according to media reports at the time.

Private-equity powers 

One weapon in Cohn's arsenal that would make him even more effective came in 2015: a private-equity fund Cohn created within Elliott, called Evergreen Coast Capital. 

The very nature of private equity — buying a company whole and improving its performance over as many as five years — was a departure from Cohn's reputation for seeking immediate change. 

The fund was started by Cohn after Elliott lost out on a bid for a company in which it was an investor: Riverbed Technologies, which Thoma Bravo and other investors bought in 2014. The fund has put billions of dollars to work, taking companies like Gigamon, Travelport, and Athenahealth private. 

With a private-equity fund at Cohn's disposal, he could walk into a boardroom meeting as a shareholder to talk about a company's performance, and then swiftly pivot, turning the conversation into a dialogue about a possible sale of the company to Elliott, one person familiar with his campaigns said.

At least one instance where this happened was the sale of LifeLock Inc., a consumer-protection company, which, after an initial meeting with Cohn in 2016, was sold to another company where Elliott was a significant investor: Symantec Corp. 

What AT&T can expect

At AT&T, of course, executives don't need to worry about a buyout. The company is too large to be acquired outright. 

Instead, Cohn is seeking to extract concessions from the company's management to conduct its business differently, including halting plans for any merger and acquisition activity, outsourcing work, and closing "redundant stores." 

 The labor-union Communications Workers of America is fighting back against the proposals.

"Our position is that this business strategy will harm local communities that rely on the good jobs and advanced communications networks that flow from AT&T investment," Christopher Shelton, the union's president, wrote in a letter to the AT&T board. 

Cohn has joined the boards of companies he has pressed in the past, such as Citrix and eBay. While it's unknown if he would end up on the AT&T board, Cohn's current and former board-member colleagues say he isn't resistant to compromise once he's able to get a better understanding of the company.

Fred Salerno, the chair of the cybersecurity company Akamai's board, said Cohn had originally wanted to fire the CEO and sell the company but relented after meeting with executives. 

"He's proven himself to be a very collaborative board member," said Bob Calderoni, who leads Citrix's board, which Cohn has been on the board for four years. 

Calderoni believes the time on boards has helped Cohn learn that "operating a company is different than investing in a company."

"He's willing to listen and learn," he said.

Lately, Cohn has been consuming a steady diet of literature, from Bob Iger's book "The Ride of a Lifetime," which offers a window into how Igor ran the Walt Disney Co. as CEO, to "Dreyer's English," a book about writing by a top editor at Random House. A person close to Cohn said the latter book influenced his wordsmithing of the AT&T letter. 

But while Cohn may be academic and cerebral, he hasn't lost the assertive nature for which he's so well known, people close to him said. 

Some are not so quick to believe Cohn has turned a new leaf at all. One person who has represented companies said that while Cohn is easier to negotiate with in producing quick settlements, he doesn't for a minute think anyone who gets in his way won't suffer his wrath. 

"The idea that he's turned a new leaf and he's a nice, kinder Jesse?" the person asked, considering the notion before then quickly dismissing it.

"I don't know. Go read The New Yorker article."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What El Chapo is really like, according to the wife of one his closest henchman

Meet the 39-year-old hedge fund star most people have never heard of who bought a $30 million penthouse on Wall Street

$
0
0

30 Park Place Place Penthouse

Jesse Cohn does not like to sit still — which is a good thing since the 39-year-old activist investor wakes up before the sun to train for triathlons and then goes into Elliott Management's midtown offices to construct campaigns against some of the biggest companies in the world.

The latest company to find itself in Cohn's crosshairs is AT&T, the media conglomerate that is an American staple. Cohn has steadily built the activism unit of the now-$38 billion Elliott to the point where he can take on a company like AT&T and be favored to win. He's led more than 100 activist campaigns, sat on the boards of companies like Citrix and eBay, and been labeled Elliott's "enfant terrible" by Fortune magazine. 

Read more: We talked to 24 people about the hedge-fund wunderkind at Elliott who wants to shake up AT&T. Here's why management should be terrified.

The work has been rewarded by Paul Singer, the billionaire founder of Elliott and Republican super donor. Cohn bought a $30 million penthouse in Manhattan's financial district that is 50 floors above a Four Seasons Hotel, according to property records and past media reports. 

In a tour of the building in 2016, Business Insider found that residents at 30 Park Place have access to "a fitness center, conservatory, screening room, children's play room, dining room with separate catering kitchen and access to the hotel restaurants, and two double-height loggias."

Residents can also access a shared 75-foot swimming pool with the Four Seasons, a spa, salon, ballroom, meeting rooms, and business center. The development offers some of the best views of the Freedom Tower in the city. 

To learn more about Cohn and his meteoric rise, click here to read the full profile. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What El Chapo is really like, according to the wife of one his closest henchman

Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>