Quantcast
Channel: Hedge Funds
Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live

Here's the top stock held by each of the 50 biggest hedge funds

$
0
0

The 50 largest hedge funds increased their exposure to stocks by 1% in the fourth quarter, according to Factset.

Most hedge funds (85.4%) held US stocks as at the end of the fourth quarter, and Apple was the largest holding of the aggregate portfolio.

"At the sector level, the 50 largest hedge funds had the largest aggregate holdings in the Information Technology (18.2%) and Consumer Discretionary (16.5%) sectors at the end of the fourth quarter," FactSet's John Butters wrote in a note Thursday.

"During the quarter, the funds added exposure in aggregate in eight of the ten sectors, led by the Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Industrials sectors. The only two sectors in which the 50 hedge funds decreased exposure in aggregate were the Consumer Discretionary and Telecom Services sectors."

Here's the table showing the holdings from the top 50 hedge funds.

50 hedge funds factset

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nationwide's Super Bowl commercial about dead children is about corporate profits ... in a way that we can all appreciate


Mike Novogratz's flagship fund just lost a quarter of its assets

$
0
0

Michael Novogratz

Investors are pulling their money out of Fortress Investment Group.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Fortress disclosed in its fourth-quarter earnings call that investors have taken back about $800 million from its flagship fund, which accounts for 25 percent of the firm's $3.2 billion assets under management.

The fund, run by Michael Novogratz, was down 1.6 percent at the end of 2014, compared to an average return of 5.7 percent among other macro hedge funds. 

Macro funds faced difficulties at the beginning of last year, and Fortress was no exception. Among Novogratz' bad calls, the WSJ listed several mistaken predictions on U.S. government bonds, the Japanese yen, and the Brazilian presidential election.

Fortress' fund isn't the only macro hedge fund to see investors withdraw. The WSJ reported that investors in rival firm Carlyle Group withdrew $2.5 billion since October. 

Since the beginning of this year, the fund is down almost 6 percent.

Read the full story at WSJ >>

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

For hedge fund managers, the only thing worse than divorce is marriage

$
0
0

divorce cake 2

Wall Street is no place to be a hopeless romantic.

A group of professors studied hedge fund managers' performance during various marital events. And they found that returns slipped more than 7% during a divorce. They did even worse around the time they got married. 

Yan Lu, Sugata Ray, and Melvyn Teo authored a paper after reviewing fund performance around the time of hundreds of marriages, divorces and, sometimes, re-marriages for 786 managers.

It quotes Paul Tudor Jones, who said at a conference in 2013 if  a "manager is going through a divorce, redeem immediately... particularly when their kids are involved."

"Relative to the pre-event window, fund alpha falls by an annualized 8.50 percent during a marriage and 7.39 percent during a divorce," the paper states. 

Alpha is the excess return over some benchmark a fund aims to generate.

Breaking up is hard to do, and the numbers prove it

These findings might considered bad news for those investing with Ken Griffin, who is currently going through a very public divorce right now.

However, judging by the paper, Griffin — estimated to have a net worth of $5.5 billion — might not have that much to worry about: "A divorce shaves 15.68 percent per year off a younger fund manager's alpha but only 4.10 percent per year off an older fund manager's alpha."

The paper quantifies 'older' and 'younger' as being at the median age for that particular life event (either marriage, or divorce). As an older fund manager, history says Griffin might not do as badly.

The only time when marriage is a good idea

Younger hedge fund managers, however, take good news in stride. The marriage game — and the investing world — is a young man's (or, woman's) game, the paper shows: "A marriage shaves 14.29 percent per year off the alpha of older fund managers but adds 1.72 percent per year to the alpha of younger fund managers," it states. 

It's worth noting that an understanding of investing and trading probably helps, too.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

DAN LOEB: Investors buying oil right now are going to be 'disappointed'

$
0
0

dan loeb

Any investors banking on cheap energy for their next big profit may need a new strategy, according to Third Point's Dan Loeb.

In a conference call reported by Bloomberg on Friday, Loeb said funds that expect to buy oil cheap and ride the upswing "might be disappointed."

After seeing seven straight months of decline, many investors are now scooping up oil and energy investments at bargain prices.

Firms taking part in this strategy include Blackstone Group and Apollo Global Management. Apollo was also hit hard by the oil slump, and recently reported an 86 percent decline in fourth quarter earnings. According to the Wall Street Journal, traditional investors have also started funds dedicated to capitalizing on the opportunity in oil.

But Loeb sees exaggeration in the price changes. "Equities have already moved up in anticipation of the recovery," he said. "We're pretty much on the sidelines of energy."

He said investing in energy right now would be "kind of like European funds that were set up to capitalize on European distressed-debt situations," Bloomberg quoted.

You can read the full story at Bloomberg >>

 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

Whitney Tilson warned us about Lumber Liquidators months ago in this troubling presentation

$
0
0

LL pres

Hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson, who runs Kase Capital, was interviewed by Anderson Cooper on "60 Minutes" about his largest short position: Lumber Liquidators.

"In 16 years of professional money management, I've seen hundreds of companies do all sorts of bad things to get their stock prices up," Tilson told Cooper. "But this has got to be the worst."

Tilson first decided to short Lumber Liquidators — North America's largest specialty retailer of hardwood flooring — back in 2013 when he saw the company's profit margins mysteriously explode.

"When you see a commodity business suddenly double its profit margins, that raises red flags,"Tilson said. "It's almost unprecedented for a company."

About six months later, Tilson was tipped off that the company was most likely purchasing formaldehyde-tainted laminated flooring in China.

In an email, Tilson wrote that after the "60 Minutes" investigation he was even more certain that the stock was a "zero."

Tilson laid it all out months ago in the following presentations, which he was kind enough to share with Business Insider.







See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The 40 richest hedge fund managers

$
0
0

Andreas Halvorsen

Forbes' magazine has just released its annual world's billionaires list.

This year, we've counted 40 names in the hedge fund industry. A few of these titans have retired in recent years. 

Fund managers are paid through a compensation structure commonly known as the "2 and 20," which stands for a 2% management fee and a 20% performance fee charge. More specifically, "2 and 20″ means a hedge fund manager would charge investors 2% of total assets under management and 20% of any profits.

Overall, 2014 was an incredibly underwhelming year in the hedge fund world. According to research firm Preqin, hedge funds, on average, returned just a mere 3.78%, the lowest annual return since the 1.85% loss in 2011. Still, there were a few fund that delivered impressive returns such as Bill Ackman's Pershing Square.

We've included a round up of the richest fund managers in the world. 

Rob Citrone

Rank: 1741

Net-worth: $1 billion

Age: 50

Fund: Discovery Capital

Source: Forbes



Brian Higgins

Rank: 1533

Net-worth: $1.2 billion

Age: 50

Fund: King Street Capital

Source: Forbes



Richard Chilton, Jr.

Rank: 1533

Net-worth: $1.2 billion

Age: 56

Fund: Chilton Investment Company

Source: Forbes



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

WHITNEY TILSON: Here are 4 reasons why I'm now even more convinced that Lumber Liquidators is going to $0

$
0
0

Whitney Tilson

Hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson, the founder of Kase Capital, saw red flags in Lumber Liquidators' numbers, and he sent to the story to "6o Minutes" and Anderson Cooper.

The "60 Minutes" report found that America's largest speciality retailer of hardwood flooring appeared to be  selling Chinese-made laminate flooring with levels of formaldehyde higher than what's permitted under California law.

After the program, Tilson circulated an email listing off four reason why he thinks the company is going to go bust.

1.    What customer is going to want to buy any product from LL?

2.    Every customer is going to demand that LL pay to have their floor tested – and not just laminated flooring.

3.    If any formaldehyde is detected (even below CARB2 standards), customers will demand that LL pay to remove and replace their floor.

4.    If anyone in a household with LL flooring (again, not limited only to laminate) suffers any illness associated with formaldehyde (chronic respiratory irritation, change in a person's lung function, increased risk of asthma; myeloid leukemia and nasopharyngeal cancer at high levels and respiratory issues as well as eye, nose and throat irritation at even low levels), they will surely demand that LL not only pay their medical bills, but also compensate them for pain and suffering, job loss, etc.

Tilson's points are part of a much longer email, which we've included below. 

Since the "60 Minutes" report, Lumber Liquidators' stock has gotten absolutely hammered.

In a statement, the company said that they believed "60 Minutes" used "and improper test method." The company also that that these were inaccurate allegations coming from short-sellers. 

"...these attacks are driven by a small group of short-selling investors who are working together for the purpose of making money by lowering our stock price.  Their motives and methods are wrong and we will fight these false attacks on all fronts." 

Lumber Liquidators is Tilson's largest short position, but it's only 3% of his portfolio. He only stands to make $3 million for his investors if the company goes bankrupt.

Tilson told Anderson Cooper that he first started shorting the stock in 2013 after he noticed a red flag regarding the company's profit margins. It wasn't until six months later that someone tipped him off that the company might be purchasing tainted wood in China. 

He also said in the email that he's even more certain the stock is going to zero. 

Here's more of Tilson's email:  

1) I love the old “conspiracy-of-short-sellers” trope. In fact, sometimes short sellers DO communicate with each other, share information and analysis, etc. There’s nothing wrong with this – investors talk to one another every day. But in this case, I’ve never had any communication whatsoever with the lawyer and environmentalist that appeared in this segment, nor with the short sellers who are apparently backing them. I’m almost embarrassed to admit that 60 Minutes found them, as I was only vaguely aware of their existence.

In fact, this is a case study of how hedge funds, however self-interested their motivations may be, can be a force for good, by doing the difficult and expensive work it can take to uncover companies doing nefarious things (such as poisoning their own customers) – and then bringing this to the attention of regulators, prosecutors and the media.

2) As for who has motivation to do nefarious things to manipulate the stock price, let’s look at the players. For me, this is around a 3% short position. So, if I’m right that the stock is a zero, I make three percentage points of return -- so, for example, instead of having a 12% year, I’d have a 15% year. It would be nice to have an extra 3% of course, but it’s not going to make or break me – and certainly not cause me to make false accusations against a good company.

In contrast, the senior executives at LL have massive incentives to get their share price up. Guess what the top two executives (Founder and Chairman Tom Sullivan and CEO Robert Lynch) did after the stock skyrocketed from ~$13 to as high as ~$119? Of course they dumped a ton of stock and pocketed a small fortune. Specifically, Sullivan, in May and August 2013, sold 300,000 shares (~1/3 of his total holdings) at an average price of $89, pocketing $26.7 million.

Meanwhile, Lynch, in May and July 2013, sold 154,500 shares at an average price of $68.61, for a total of $10.6 million (contrast this with his total cash comp in 2012 of $1.2 million). (He appears to have sold every share he could at that time, as his remaining holdings hadn’t vested yet.) 

So, in summary, I stand to make for my investors less than $3 million if I’m right and the stock goes to zero, whereas just the top two guys at LL have already cashed out to the tune of $37.3 million!

3) As for LL challenging the test results, I can’t figure out if they are evil liars, trying to cover up the fact that they’re knowingly poisoning their own customers to save a few bucks on sourcing costs, or whether they’re just incompetent – but it’s one or the other. Based on my research and analysis, I believe that LL’s testing regimen is largely a sham because it’s disconnected from rigorous, credible tests that others (regulators, Home Depot, Lowe’s, etc.) use and rely on. Evidence for this are the results from five independent sets of tests, including one I commissioned, which show that LL is buying and selling to its customers highly toxic laminated wood (virtually all of it from China).

4) Once it becomes clear that LL is, in fact, doing this, they will undoubtedly go on an apology tour, saying how sorry they are and positioning themselves as the victims who were defrauded by unscrupulous Chinese mills. This is complete nonsense. Laminated wood is a low-end, global commodity product in which 1% or 2% differences in pricing are meaningful. For a savvy player like LL, which has been buying in China for roughly two decades, they would instantly know that if they were buying 10% below the standard price for a particular piece of laminated wood that something was wrong: perhaps it was stolen, used illegal or incorrect wood, was of exceptionally low quality, or was filled with toxic chemicals.

Maybe this example will resonate. Let’s say you’re in Shanghai and looking to buy the DVD of the latest Hollywood movie – let’s say, Academy Award winner Birdman, which is still in theaters, so it’s of course not yet out on DVD. Ah, but lo and behold, as you walk down the street, you see that a street vendor has a copy and sells it to you for $2. Moments later, the police apprehend you and accuse you of buying illegal /forged merchandise. You would of course claim that you had no idea – but OF COURSE you knew, based on where you were (China) and the price you paid.

Similarly, LL had to have known there was something seriously wrong with the laminated wood it was buying, given the absurdly low price and the fact that it was coming from China, which is the wild west when it comes to environmental standards and rule of law. Even if the Chinese mills said they were CARB 2 compliant and even if they were supposedly inspected, this cannot be relied on. Heck, this is a country that sold us defective wallboard that soon because filled with toxic mold, and which pumped pigs full of clenbuterol (see: www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2011/April/19041102.asp). In short, many Chinese companies, especially those in highly competitive, commoditized industries, scoff at most regulations, especially if the product is being shipped to the US. Many friends have told me that China is for the Chinese; if they can screw Americans, they will – and they did with LL, which might take down company. 

But LL’s pleas that they are the victim here ring hollow once you realize that the two biggest buyers of wood flooring in the US, Home Depot and Lowe’s, also buy laminated wood in China, yet don’t have a formaldehyde problem (to the best of my knowledge). The reason is simple: they have serious, rigorous compliance programs and understand that you can’t hit the low bid in China and expect to get high-quality, compliant product. So they pay more and get good flooring – but earn lower margins, something LL wasn’t willing to do in its pell mell pursuit (regardless of the consequences) of a higher and higher stock price so insiders could cash out.

It worked for a couple of years – but now I believe the company is going to have to pay a price that I believe will bankrupt it, for a number of reasons:

1.    What customer is going to want to buy any product from LL?

2.    Every customer is going to demand that LL pay to have their floor tested – and not just laminated flooring.

3.    If any formaldehyde is detected (even below CARB2 standards), customers will demand that LL pay to remove and replace their floor.

4.    If anyone in a household with LL flooring (again, not limited only to laminate) suffers any illness associated with formaldehyde (chronic respiratory irritation, change in a person's lung function, increased risk of asthma; myeloid leukemia and nasopharyngeal cancer at high levels and respiratory issues as well as eye, nose and throat irritation at even low levels), they will surely demand that LL not only pay their medical bills, but also compensate them for pain and suffering, job loss, etc.

I believe the combination of a dramatic decline in sales plus the massive contingent liabilities will quickly overwhelm the company’s ability to stay in business. While it has no debt, it only has $20M in cash and earned a mere $17M in net income in 2014 (while operating cash flow was $57M, cap ex was $71M, resulting in free cash flow of -$14M).

SEE ALSO: Whitney Tilson warned us about Lumber Liquidators months ago in this troubling presentation

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

What happened with Lumber Liquidators is a perfect example of why hedge funds can be great for America

$
0
0

Whitney Tilson's table.

Whitney Tilson, who runs Kase Capital, just gave us all a great example of how hedge funds can be a force of good.

On Sunday,"60 Minutes" and Anderson Cooper ran a damning report about Lumber Liquidators–America's largest specialty retailer of hardwood floors. The report found that Lumber Liquidators appears to be selling laminate flooring from China with levels of formaldehyde that's higher than what's permitted under California law. High levels of formaldehyde have a number of health concerns. 

A lot of people have been talking about the story. And the stock price has taken an absolute beating. 

Tilson was the one who flagged this story for "60 Minutes." He did an interview for the piece, but other than that he left the investigative work to the reporters.

He later wrote in a group email he circulated that he was in "awe" of the investigative journalism. He pointed out that they uncovered things that he didn't know.

In an interview later with CNBC's Scott WapnerTilson explained that he didn't see it as a conflict of interest. He felt he had a moral obligation share the troubling findings.  

"I discovered what Lumber Liquidators was doing–poisoning its customers. And I said there was a beautiful, not conflict of interest, but confluence of interest between me doing my job as a hedge fund manager and exposing a company that's doing terrible things to untold numbers of Americans. So, honestly, I have never been prouder than bringing this story to light," Tilson said on CNBC.

CNBC's Wapner asked Tilson was if he felt there would be a conflict of interests if short-sellers were backing lawsuits against the company. Tilson said he was not funding any lawsuits. He said there are some short-sellers based in California doing so, but that he wasn't aware they existed until the "60 Minutes" piece aired. 

Tilson also isn't hiding what he stands to gain from his short. He said in the group email that his fund's position in Lumber Liquidators represents about 3% of the overall portfolio. He also said that his investors will make less $3 million if the stock goes to $0. 

The bottom line here is that funds have the ability and the resources to shed light on issues that the public would want to know about. And it's OK if they make money for their investors in the process. 

"In fact, this is a case study of how hedge funds, however self-interested their motivations may be, can be a force for good, by doing the difficult and expensive work it can take to uncover companies doing nefarious things (such as poisoning their own customers) – and then bringing this to the attention of regulators, prosecutors and the media," Tilson wrote in the group email after the segment aired. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes


Argentina says the 'vultures' circling overhead have multiplied, and they're asking for billions

$
0
0

axel kicillof

Investors in Argentina known as "me too" bondholders have filed $6-$8 billion worth of claims for more of the country's money to US Judge Thomas Griesa, says Argentine Economy Minister Axel Kicillof.

And as far as Kicillof is concerned, those investors won't get a dime more than what he believes they are owed.

"Griesa asked that all those filing claims go to court and they're there now. The news ... what there is to recount, is that those who showed up are also vultures, and many of those who filed a claim initially showed up, like Paul Singer."Kicillof said in a radio interview in Argentina. "What this tells us is that this is all a trap. Eighty-five percent of those who've made claims in this round are vulture funds."

Paul SingerThe "me too" bondholders are following the lead of a hedge fund manager who is now notorious in Argentina: Paul Singer.

Singer bought Argentine debt after the country's last massive default in 2002. Then, instead of taking the opportunity to restructure that debt in 2005 and 2010, he and a few others (known collectively as NML) insisted on getting paid 100 cents on the dollar. That, in Argentina, makes them "vulture funds."

The fact that Singer got a court in Ghana to impound an Argentine naval vessel back in 2012 didn't help matters (the International Martime Court of the Sea made Ghana release the boat).

Singer continued suing the Republic for the over $1.3 billion he has said he's owed, and presiding Judge Thomas Griesa sided with him. So did the US Supreme Court, which refused to even hear Argentina's appeal.

Consequently, according to Griesa's ruling, Argentina could not pay any bondholders if it did not also pay NML (which is what it had been trying to do).

vulture protest argentina

Even then, the Buenos Aires would not pay. As a result, the country went into "selective default" last July. Because of that, the country is now also open to claims from more investors. Judge Griesa gave them until March 2 to file. Argentina has until March 17 to respond — but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure what they might say. In the past, all of Argentina's talk about wanting to negotiate has been just that: talk.

"Argentine law leaves us well covered because it's very clear that the bonds under Argentine law are our domain," Kicillof said on Tuesday. "Griesa will try to stop creditors from being paid under Argentine law, which is extortion and allows the vultures to tell the entire world that the country is knocked out thanks to its bad behavior."

NML, for its part, argues that the bonds in question are under New York's jurisdiction. It was after the entire "selective default" mess happened that Argentina tried to bring them under Buenos Aires' jurisdiction. The maneuver did not amuse Judge Griesa, or really anyone else.

argentina monthly economic activityNevertheless, a multibillion-dollar bill is too much for the country at this time. Inflation is high (40%) in Argentina, capital flight is rampant, the country's balance of payments is off balance, and in January there was a shortage of tampons that nearly had women protesting in the streets.

As of this fall, there was under $30 billion in Argentina's central bank.

And of course with lawsuits like this going on no one wants to buy Argentine debt. A bond offering proposed last week was "suspended" after NML cried foul.

The Wall Street banks hired to handle the bond offering sent potential investors a warning letter saying they would not be held responsible for anything that happened after the bonds were purchased. Basically, they were saying, once you buy these, you're on your own.

If that sounds like it would be a really risky investment, that's because it is. However, President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner (and Kicillof) are supposed to leave office after this year, so some analysts believe a new government will get Argentina back on track. 

Would you take that bet?

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

Casino mogul Steve Wynn's slander lawsuit against Jim Chanos got slapped down hard

$
0
0

steve wynn

A California judge has dismissed casino mogul Steve Wynn's libel lawsuit against hedge fund manager Jim Chanos, founder of Kynikos Associates. 

The suit was dismissed with prejudice and Wynn will have to pay Chanos' legal expenses.

"I need look no further than the transcript and video of the symposium to conclude that Chanos’s words do not amount to a statement of fact, but rather an opinion that is not actionable. For these reasons, and because I grant Chanos’s motion to dismiss," Judge William Orrick wrote in his decision.

The suit was filed in September. Wynn accused Chanos of slandering him at a closed talk in April of 2014 in which Chanos discussed his thoughts on Macau's casino industry. Wynn said that Chanos accused him and his firm of being in violation of the federal Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. He also argued that Wynn Resorts had been "thoroughly investigated" by regulators already.

You can see video of the event here. Chanos starts speaking around 4:00 and again around 36:00.

"I need look no further than the transcript and video of the symposium to conclude that Chanos’s words do not amount to a statement of fact, but rather an opinion that is not actionable," Orrick wrote.

Jim ChanosHe also added: "Chanos’s remarks at the symposium expressed “general uncertainty about the questionable business methods in Macau...” The statement “I got a little nervous the deeper we dug into Macau and the more I got concerned that although I was long, the U.S. casino operators, like Mr. Adelson and Mr. Wynn, I began to really get concerned about the risk I was taking with clients’ money under Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and a variety of other, you know, aspects of exactly how business is done there” does not amount to a factual assertion... There is no way to prove this view to be false, because the truth of the statement does not turn on a finding that Wynn did or did not violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”)."

Chanos has been public about his negative view on Macau in more public forums as well. On May 15 of last year, Chanos told CNBC that he would "no longer be long on the Macau casino."

 

Chanos launched his short-only firm back in the 1980s and catapulted to international fame after helping to bring accounting fraud at Enron before the company went bankrupt.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

Ken Griffin makes $90,000 per hour even while he's sleeping, according to his soon-to-be-ex-wife

$
0
0

Ken Griffin

Chicago hedge fund manager Ken Griffin makes more than $90,000 per hour even while he's sleeping, CNBC reports citing a new court filing from his soon-to-be-ex-wife.

CNBC's Robert Frank reports: 

According to the latest filings, Griffin's ex-wife, Anne Dias, said his monthly gross income "approaches $100 million," and his net monthly income after taxes "averages over $68.5 million."

That works out to more than $2.2 million a day, or upward of $90,000 per hour.

Just last month, Griffin alleged in a filing that his ex was requesting that he give her $1 million per month to cover living expenses and child support. He also claimed that his ex wanted $6,800 for groceries and $7,200 for restaurants. 

Back in July, Griffin filed for divorce from his wife of 11 years, Dias-Griffin, while she was on summer vacation with their three children.

Griffin, 46, is the founder of hedge fund giant Citadel LLC. Dias-Griffin, 44, was born in France. She is the founder of the hedge fund firm Aragon Global Management.

Dias-Griffin later filed a petition seeking equitable division of their assets and sole custody of their children. She asked for their prenup thrown out.Under the terms of the prenup, Dias-Griffin said that she will receive 1 percent of Griffin's assets. Griffin has an estimated net worth of $6.5 billion, according to Forbes.

Griffin and Dias-Griffin were married in Versailles in July 2003. This is the second divorce for Griffin. He divorced his first wife in 1994.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

Bill Ackman is already having a lovely year

$
0
0

Bill Ackman

Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, the CEO of $19 billion Pershing Square Capital Management, is killing it again this year.

Reuters' Svea Herbst-Bayliss reports that the 48-year-old activist investor posted gains of 5.8% in February. Pershing Square is up 6.5% this year, the report said.

Meanwhile, the S&P 500 is up just over 2% this year.

Ackman had a monster year in 2014, netting 40.4% for the year thanks to his hugely profitable stake in Allergan.

For the most part, 2014 was a challenging year for hedge funds. According to the research firm Preqin, hedge funds on average returned just 3.78%, the lowest annual return since their 1.85% loss in 2011. For comparison, the S&P 500 rose 13% last year.

Ackman has said before that he wants to have "one of the greatest investment track records of all time." He has also said he would like to surpass legendary investor Warren Buffett's record. He is ranked No. 19 on fund-of-funds LCH Investments' "Greatest Money Managers" list.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

John Paulson is off to a good start this year

$
0
0

John PaulsonBillionaire hedge fund manager John Paulson, who runs $18 billion Paulson & Co., is off to a solid start so far this year. 

Bloomberg News' Simone Foxman reports that the fund's unlevered merger-arbitrage fund, Paulson Partners, rose 3% in February, while the levered version, Paulson Partners Enhanced, climbed 6.5% last month.

The two merger-arbitrage funds, which manage about half of the fund's assets, are up 4.2% and 9.3% for the year, the Bloomberg report said.   

Last year, marked Paulson's second-worst performance ever with his Advantage Plus fund falling 36% and his Advantage fund falling 29%. In 2014, Paulson Partners ended the year up 0.8%, while the Enhanced fund fell 1.6%

Paulson, 59, became famous for his 2007 bet against subprime mortgages. 

Here's a look at the performance of a couple of hedge fund categories through Feb. 18 via Goldman Sachs.

hedge funds

SEE ALSO: John Paulson explains to MBA students how he makes a ridiculous amount of money

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

A hedge fund reportedly fired a trader because he was IM'ing another trader at Steve Cohen's firm

$
0
0

Nicholas O'Grady

Last month, energy trader Nick O'Grady sued his former employer, hedge fund giant BlueCrest Capital Management, over an unpaid $1.28 million bonus.

In the complaint, he said he was fired "without cause" on June 4, 2014, after six months at Michael Platt's $14 billion firm. 

Bloomberg News is reporting that BlueCrest accused O'Grady of sharing information over instant message with a portfolio manager at Steve Cohen's Point72 Asset Management (formerly SAC Capital), according to unnamed sources.

O'Grady, 36, used to work at Sigma Capital Management, an SAC Capital subsidiary. A representative for Point72 Asset Management told Bloomberg News that there was "nothing improper about communicating about trading positions after they occurred." 

O'Grady was hired by BlueCrest in October 2013 amid turmoil at SAC. 

In summer 2013, SAC was criminally indicted on insider-trading charges. SAC pleaded guilty in November 2013 and agreed to pay a $1.8 billion fineSAC also agreed to no longer manage outside capital and to operate as a "family office" instead. The fund then changed its name to Point72 Asset Management. 

O'Grady was offered a base salary of $250,000 at BlueCrest, and his bonus would be 18% of his performance, Forbes reported, citing the complaint. O'Grady's attorney, Jonathan Sack, told Bloomberg that O'Grady made the fund $9.2 million during his time there. 

He is now a portfolio manager at Hudson Bay Capital, which told Bloomberg it was aware he was fired. It also said it was "satisfied" with his explanation for the termination. 

We reached out to O'Grady's attorney for further comment.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

The hedge fund manager shorting Lumber Liquidators has 'significantly' increased his position

$
0
0

Whitney Tilson with Gary Vura.Hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson, who runs Kase Capital, wrote in an email that he has "significantly increased" his short position in Lumber Liquidators since the "60 Minutes" report.

On Sunday,"60 Minutes" and Anderson Cooper aired a damning report about Lumber Liquidators–America's largest specialty retailer of hardwood floors. The report found that Lumber Liquidators appears to be selling laminate flooring from China with levels of formaldehyde that's higher than what's permitted under California law. High levels of formaldehyde have a number of health concerns. 

Tilson, who has been short Lumber Liquidators since 2013, was the one who flagged the story for the "60 Minutes" investigation. He didn't sell or increase his position while "60 Minutes" conducted its own investigation.

In an email, he wrote that he added "materially" to his position after the report aired. He wrote that he had not touched the position since October when he gave "60 Minutes" the tip. The short now makes up 3.8% of his portfolio, which he said is a large short for him.

Since the "60 Minutes" report aired, shares of Lumber Liquidators have fallen more than 36%. 

Here's Tilson's email: 

After not trading the stock at all since early October last year – I didn’t want there to be any questions about my trading in advance of the 60 Minutes story (you think nearly five months is conservative enough? ;-) – I added materially to my short position on Wednesday and yesterday, such that it is now a 3.8% position, which is a very large for a short for me.

Allow me to explain why:

I’m not even trying to hazard a guess at what LL’s liabilities might be (though I think it’s likely that they’ll be far more than enough to swamp the company, making the stock a zero) because I don’t have to have an opinion on this to have this be my largest short today. My rationale is as follows: 

On the revenue side, this story has been picked up by a ton of local news outlets across the country, so millions of LL’s past, present and future customers are aware of the formaldehyde issue – and they are freaking out based on numerous anecdotal stories I’m hearing: installers saying most of their jobs have been cancelled, contractors swearing to customers that they’ll never use LL’s products ever again, etc. This leads me to believe that LL’s sales ($1.047 billion last year) will take a major, lasting hit, no matter what spin the company puts out there. How big of a hit and for how long? Who knows. But it will be very material I think.

On the expense/margin side, the company faces major issues:

 a) Legal and compliance costs going through the roof immediately;

b) Government penalties/sanctions associated with Lacey Act violations (i.e., buying hardwoods that were illegally harvested in Siberia) (by the way, the formaldehyde scandal makes it much more likely that the government will act forcefully in this area, now that they know the company is a bad actor in other areas); and

c) Likely massive (though unquantifiable) contingent liabilities. 

But even ignoring all of this, at the very least LL now has to of course start sourcing its products legally, which I think are likely to bring margins back to historical levels (if not below them). This chart shows LL’s operating margin going back 11 years (all the data CapitalIQ had): 

Whitney Tilson LL chart

 

This chart captures what was a key factor in my initial short thesis: since when does a commodity business, competing against giants like Home Depot and Lowe’s, with an operating margin consistently between 4-8%, suddenly (in less than two years) more than double margins? That’s so unusual and inexplicable that I figured they had to be cheating (and was I ever right!). 

Thus, I think it’s very likely that LL’s margins, which were already starting to return to historical levels in 2014, will quickly fall to the 4-8% range they’d always been in (and I’m being very generous in excluding a possibly massive hit to sales and skyrocketing expenses due to the formaldehyde scandal).

So where might that take the stock, even before the contingent liabilities start to hit? Well, as of last week (pre-crisis), 2015 earnings estimates were $2.74, very close to peak earnings of $2.77 in 2013. I’d be shocked if LL earned $2 this year – and, if so, a 10 multiple would be a stretch in light of declining earnings, a tidal wave of lawsuits (even if most get thrown out or settled for an affordable amount), etc. So that would be a $20 stock, down 40% from today’s level around $33.

Applying a more realistic scenario, I think the company might earn only $1.50 (and I truly think I’m being generous here) and trade at 6x this amount, leaving the stock at $9, down 73% from here. (I haven’t quite picked that number out of thin air, as Herbalife, another tainted company I’m short, is currently trading at 6.6x peak earnings of $4.91 in 2013.)

In summary, I don’t have to have an opinion today on whether LL’s stock is a zero. All I have to believe is that it likely has huge downside from here – and that there’s only a small chance of meaningful positive news flow that could run it up against me. (I’m very cognizant of what happened to HLF after it tumbled after the first major wave of negative publicity – that run-up was very painful for a lot of shorts, including me. But I just don’t see a Carl Icahn/Dan Loeb/Bill Stiritz getting involved here, nor the company reporting great numbers for the next few quarters and/or buying back a lot of stock. The only real danger I see is a short-term short squeeze – there is now a huge short interest – perhaps triggered by some investors believing (foolishly) the positive things the company will surely say next Thursday on its scheduled conference call – but I don’t worry too much about short-term volatility.) 

In summary, when LL’s stock gets down to the high end of my range ($20), I can re-evaluate based on the information I have then about what to do. Until then, however, it’s an easy decision to load up on my short position.

SEE ALSO: Whitney Tilson warned us about Lumber Liquidators months ago in this troubling presentation

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes


A new wave of activist investors is shaking up corporate America

$
0
0

William Ackman, founder and CEO of hedge fund Pershing Square Capital Management, speaks to the audience about Herbalife company  in New York, July 22, 2014. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

BOSTON (Reuters) - The largest new field of activist investors in years is shaking up corporate America, seeking to tap into billions of dollars in available capital and inspired by the outsized returns of brand-name agitators like William Ackman and Carl Icahn.

The surge could force more companies into costly battles with shareholders over leadership, spin-offs, and buybacks, though some of the new entrants risk being brushed off if corporate boards find they lack good ideas or firepower.

"Everyone wants to be an activist these days. Everyone wants that capital," said Damien Park, head of consulting group Hedge Fund Solutions.        

In the last five months, some 45 hedge funds launched their first ever activist campaigns, according to data from research firm Activist Insight, up from 26 new entrants the same period the previous year, and 15 the year before. The October through March period is traditionally the most active season, coming in the runup to companies' annual meetings, usually held in the spring and early summer when boards are elected.

Among the newcomers are firms like H Partners, Chieftain Capital, Isaac Capital, Vertex Capital, Jet Capital and Heng Ren Investments, some of which are taking on big names in the corporate sphere. H Partners and Chieftain, for example, are pressuring bedding-maker Tempur Sealy to change its leadership, while Jet Capital is complaining about "poor capital allocation" at SunCoke Energy.

They join more established hedge funds that are also promoting activist campaigns, including Kyle Bass' Hayman Capital and David Tepper's Appaloosa Management, which are pushing for former Goldman Sachs banker Harry Wilson, who had been a part of the Obama administration's auto task force, to join General Motors' board.

Activism has picked up dramatically since the 2008 financial crisis, but it has been popular before including in the 1970s to late 1980s when financiers including Carl Icahn and Nelson Peltz were called corporate raiders for their strong-arm tactics used to replace top management and improve value for shareholders.

The surge comes as activist funds outpace traditional long-short-equity rivals' returns, and draw inflows:  Activist funds gained an average 6.3 percent in 2014 -- with Ackman returning 40 percent -- crushing the average fund's 3.5 percent increase, Hedge Fund Research data show. To be sure, an investor who simply tracked the Standard & Poor's 500 index in 2014 would have gained 12 percent.

Last year, 71 dedicated activist funds that oversee $119.2 billion in assets took in a record $14.2 billion in new money, nearly three times the $5.3 billion they pulled in 2013, HFR said. Meanwhile, about $135 billion in money is sitting on the sidelines earmarked for activist strategies, according to advisory firm Kingsdale Shareholder Services.

Still, with less expertise, fewer connections and less cash, some of the newcomers risk falling flat.

"This is like playing sports where you can't simply copy your rival's playbook and hope to replicate success if your team can't execute well," said Kingsdale CEO Wesley Hall.

The world's 14 top activists have on average $16 billion to deploy in full throttle fights, while the newcomers often have less than $100 million in assets, Activist Insight said.

"There will inevitably be opportunists who are trying to ride a momentum moment," said Richard McGuire who runs $3 billion Marcato Capital Management. "But maybe some of them have a good nose for good ideas and I wouldn't be as quick to dismiss them."

 

(Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and John Pickering)

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 14 things you didn't know your iPhone headphones could do

Hedge funds pushed GM to buy back stock — and GM gave in to demands (GM)

$
0
0

Vehicles are covered with protective wrap as workers prepare the General Motors automakers display ahead of the media preview of the North American International Auto Show at Cobo Center in Detroit, Michigan January 11, 2014.  REUTERS/Rebecca Cook

(Reuters) - General Motors Co. is expected to announce later on Monday plans to repurchases shares, responding to pressure from a group of hedge funds to return more cash to investors.

GM is expected to disclose details of the repurchase later this morning, according to two people familiar with the coming announcement.

The Wall Street Journal reported earlier that a buyback is expected on Monday. An agreement could prevent a proxy fight with hedge funds that have been demanding that GM return more cash to shareholders on a faster timetable.

The Detroit auto giant signaled last month that it intended to return to investors a chunk of its roughly $25 billion cash pile. But company executives didn't offer specifics, and indicated that any significant new share repurchase would have to wait until the resolution of certain legal proceedings.

GM is under investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice in connection with its mishandling of recalls related to a deadly ignition switch defect in older cars. The company faces a separate and potentially costly legal challenge connected to the delayed ignition switch recalls in U.S. bankruptcy court.

A group of hedge funds led by investor Harry Wilson disclosed in February that it had amassed a 1.9 percent stake in GM shares, and said GM should launch an $8 billion share buyback over the next year.

Wilson is a former member of the Obama administration auto task force who was instrumental in GM's federally financed bankruptcy restructuring in 2009.

Wilson is also seeking a seat on GM's board of directors. It's not clear how or whether GM will offer a response to that proposal today.

Last week from another big GM shareholder, Warren Buffett, who told CNBC that he disagreed with putting "somebody on the board who has an option on some other people's stock which is only good for two years." The reference was to an agreement Wilson has with his hedge fund allies that could pay him 2 to 4 percent of the gains on their GM shares over the next two years.

GM's largest single shareholder is a healthcare trust controlled by the United Auto Workers union

UAW President Dennis Williams told Reuters last month that he was concerned the proposed $8 billion buyback was premature, but he didn't oppose a smaller return of cash.

(Reporting By Joe White; Editing by W Simon)

SEE ALSO: This 33-year-old race-car driver woke up after a crash and thought he was 13

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what X-Men would look like if Wes Anderson directed it

Bill Ackman finally bought some Valeant stock (VRX)

$
0
0

Bill AckmanActivist investor Bill Ackman, the CEO of $20 billion Pershing Square Capital, now owns a $3.3 billion stake in Valeant Pharmaceuticals, Reuters' Svea Herbst-Bayliss reports citing an unnamed source. 

According to Reuters, Ackman owns an approximately 5% passive stake in the Canadian drug company. He started building the position this year. 

Last year, Ackman teamed up with Valeant to pursue a hostile takeover of Allergan, the maker of Botox. All of Ackman and Valeant's offers were rejected.

At the time, Ackman didn't own any shares of Valeant. According to Reuters, he couldn't own Valeant shares while they were working on the takeover together. 

Ackman made more than $2.28 billion on his position in Allergan after the company was acquired by Actavis in a $66 billion deal.

Shares of Valeant were last trading up about 2.07% at $202.91 per share. 

Valeant

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This Excel trick will save you time and impress your boss

Steve Cohen's fund is going quant

$
0
0

steve cohen anthony scaramucci

Steve Cohen's Point72 Asset Management is moving into quantitative investing.

According to Bloomberg, the firm has 30 new hires dedicated to building investing models that use computer analysis of public data. A spokesman for Point72 Asset Management said the new project was called Aperio.

He said Aperio would work with all seven of the firm's equity units to provide a technological and data-driven edge.

"People who can read the signals most accurately and analyze them are the ones who will generate returns," the spokesman told Bloomberg.

Cohen managed astronomical returns way before data was widely used and available. The hedge fund giant actually got his start as a "tape reader," which relies on intuition and understanding the movement of stock ticker numbers, rather than math or algorithms.

President Doug Haynes is leading the project, but Point72 is still working to hire a manager to oversee Aperio's operations.

Another notable hedge fund, Ray Dalio's Bridgewater Associates, also recently announced a foray into computer-based investing. Dalio's hedge fund is building an artificial-intelligence team that will launch next month.

Cohen launched the hedge fund SAC Capital in 1992, but he closed the firm after he was charged for insider trading. He now runs Point72, a family office fund, out of Stamford, Connecticut.

Read the full story at Bloomberg >>

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what separates the Excel masters from the wannabes

Lumber Liquidators is surging after an infamous short-selling firm uses logic to explain why the company isn't screwed (LL)

$
0
0

wood screw head

Influential short-seller Citron Research says in a new note that the sell-off in the hardwood-floor retailer Lumber Liquidators may be "largely overdone." 

Since a troubling "60 Minutes" investigative report on the company aired March 1, shares have collapsed about 40%. On Tuesday they were trading up more than 10%, or $2.80, at about $30.75.

"60 Minutes" found that Lumber Liquidators appeared to be selling laminate flooring from China with levels of formaldehyde higher than what is permitted under California law. High levels of formaldehyde have been tied to numerous health concerns.

Afterward, Lumber Liquidators in a statement accused "60 Minutes" of using "an improper test method in its reporting." The company has also scheduled a conference call for Thursday morning to discuss its products.

In its note, Citron pointed out that folks may have missed a document posted on the California Air Resources Board (CARB) homepage advising people not to rip up their composite wood flooring. The document does not mention the "60 Minutes" report:

As a general rule, we do not recommend removing a flooring product unless there are noticeable health effects (i.e. nose and throat irritation, a burning sensation of the eyes, wheezing, and difficulty in breathing), and other measures taken to alleviate them have failed and there is good reason to believe the flooring is the source of the problem.

Citron also suggested it was likely that CARB was aware of the "60 Minutes" investigation. 

"Investors and short sellers take note: Let us take this logic a step further. We can only assume that the California Air Resources Board has known about the 60 Minutes piece for a few months now. We would speculate with near certainty that 60 Minutes reached out to the agency. Not only have they advised consumers not to rip out their floors, they have not even ordered Lumber Liquidators China import product off the shelves in California. If in fact the company was "poisoning" people, as some investors would have you believe, than at the least CARB would immediately halt all sales of noncompliant product," the Citron note said. 

All in all, Citron recommended "cautious investing to all ... long or short." 

LL chart

 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Jeff Bezos: Why I Always Tell Employees Not To Pat Themselves When Our Stock Is Up

Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>