Quantcast
Channel: Hedge Funds
Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live

Billionaire hedge fund manager Ken Griffin trounced rival Steve Cohen in 2019 with a 19% return, but both underperformed the stock market

$
0
0

Ken Griffin

  • Ken Griffin's Citadel posted a 19.4% return in 2019, beating out industry rival Steve Cohen's Point72 fund and its 16% gain, Bloomberg reported.
  • Both offices, and the greater hedge fund industry, still lagged behind a soaring US stock market. The S&P 500 notched a 29% return last year, its best annual performance since 2013.
  • Griffin and Cohen's rivalry extended beyond traditional fund competition in 2019. At least five of Point72's portfolio managers left the firm for Citadel throughout the year, The Wall Street Journal reported in July.
  • Cohen reportedly refused to shake one portfolio manager's hand after he took a job at Griffin's fund.
  • Visit the Business Insider homepage for more stories.

Ken Griffin's Citadel posted a 19.4% return in 2019 with its primary multistrategy hedge fund, beating out industry rivals including Steve Cohen's Point72, Bloomberg reported Tuesday night.

Cohen's fund returned about 16% over the year, sources familiar said. Both firms outperformed the hedge fund sector's 9% gain in 2019, according to Bloomberg's Hedge Fund Indices. The offices still lagged behind the greater US stock market, as the S&P 500 notched a 29% return, its best annual performance since 2013.

Citadel's Wellington fund secured gains across all five of its strategies and outperformed peers throughout most of 2019, Bloomberg reported. The firm returned all of last year's profits to its investors, paying out more than $6 billion.

The Wellington fund has outgunned the S&P 500 since its inception in 1990, and also outperformed the key index on a rolling two-year, five-year, and 10-year basis, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Tensions between Griffin and Cohen extended beyond traditional fund competitiveness in 2019. At least five of Point72's portfolio managers left the firm for Citadel through the year, The Wall Street Journal reported in July. The departures upset Cohen, sources told The Journal, and the fund manager reportedly refused to shake one portfolio manager's hand when he revealed he took a job at Griffin's fund.

About 20 portfolio managers in total left Point72 last year, The Journal reported.

Point72 is Cohen's second foray into the hedge fund industry following the closure of SAC Capital in 2016. The first firm was among the most profitable hedge funds in the US before it pleaded guilty to an insider trading scheme in November 2013 and paid $1.8 billion in penalties.

SAC was also known as one of the nation's highest-paying funds, former employees told The Journal, saying that Point72's pay isn't as high compared to Cohen's first firm. Cohen expressed surprise at Citadel's compensation packages and looked for ways to boost payment at Point72, sources familiar told The Journal in July.

Multistrategy funds spread investments across several assets, including stocks, bonds, currencies, and interest rates. Most investment vehicles appreciated through the 12-month period, including oil, gold, and bitcoin.

Now read more markets coverage from Markets Insider and Business Insider:

Here's why one stock is 5 times more expensive in Shanghai than it is in Hong Kong

Boeing sees $4.3 billion of market value erased after a fatal 737 crash in Iran

Goldman Sachs lost at least 36 partners last year. Here's a list of all the names we know — and it shows a securities-division exodus.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A big-money investor in juggernauts like Facebook and Netflix breaks down the '3rd wave' firms that are leading the next round of tech disruption


This hedge fund trounced the market in 2019 while most others fell way short. Here's how Lansdowne's big bets on clean energy paid off.

$
0
0

wind turbine tech

  • Lansdowne Partners operates one of the largest hedge funds for clean energy. It held $221 million in assets at the end of last year, according to an HSBC report. 
  • In 2018, the fund saw negative returns in the double-digits, which is what makes this year's performance — returns of more than 37%, besting even the stock market — so stunning. 
  • Fund manager Per Lekander told Business Insider it's due to three things: The falling costs of renewable energy; the world waking up to climate change; and the absence of "extremely" poor investments. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Renewable energy won big in 2019, and so did some investors backing the industry.

Lansdowne Partners' clean energy fund surged 37%, besting the broader stock market, according to an HSBC hedge fund report.  The fund, with $221 million in assets at the end of last year, is one of the largest green-energy hedge funds in the world.

The fund's returns trounced the average 2019 hedge fund returns of 8%. The surge is a reversal from 2018, when the fund posted negative returns in the double digits, per the report. 

The drastic reversal can be attributed to three things, according to Per Lekander, the fund's manager: The performance of two companies in 2018; the world waking up to climate change; and the falling costs of renewables. 

The clean energy fund made two investments that performed 'extremely poorly' in 2018

Headquartered in London, Lansdowne is among the largest hedge fund managers in the UK, running several equity-focused funds and owning part of the Manchester United soccer team.

Per Lekander joined the firm in 2014 to lead its energy strategy, and in 2016, began spearheading a new clean energy fund. The clean energy fund, he says, buys positions in a wide range of companies, from utilities with renewable assets to manufacturers of wind turbines and electric trains. 

In 2017, the fund saw strong returns — over 14%, according to the HSBC report. But investors weren't so lucky the next year when it flipped, falling by more than 14%. 

In an exclusive interview with Business Insider, Lekander attributes that 2018 loss, in part, to two "extremely poor" investments. He wouldn't share much detail on the record, but he mentioned that those losses were tied to energy companies with poor liquidity, and they made up a good chunk of the difference in returns between 2018 and 2019. 

"The change in my strategy was really, 'OK, let's focus more on ensuring liquidity in 2019, so we don't end up in this situation,'" he said.

And it worked: "In 2018 we had two investments, which essentially blew up, and in 2019 we had none that blew up." 

2019 was the year the world woke up to climate change

Last year, the world woke up to climate change, Lekander says. He said that this global change in consciousness is a key driver of the clean energy fund's spike in performance. 

"Everyone acknowledges there is an energy transition going on from dirty, mainly fossil fuel energy towards a renewable future," he said."In 2019, this went mainstream. So obviously this was very helpful to performance." 

If you're looking for a sign that the energy transition is underway, just consider the performance in one of Lansdowne's other funds, focused on energy and infrastructure more broadly (and not clean energy). In 2019, it grew by less than 1%, according to HSBC. 

"The out-performance of clean versus dirty [energy] has been quite dramatic here," he said. 

In an interview with the FT a year ago, Lekander predicted a rapidly changing reality for energy investors, saying that he thinks coal demand in Europe will fall to close to zero by 2021. 

The falling cost of renewable energy technologies

The energy transition Lekander described is tied, in part, to the falling cost of renewables. Since the end of 2009, the price of solar panel modules has dropped by about 80%, while the cost of wind turbines has fallen by 30% to 40%, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency. 

"It became apparent to the market last year that sustainable technologies no longer costs more," he said. "You don't need subsidies anymore. So you had an explosion in growth rates, which was clearly helpful to companies' numbers."

Among Lansdowne's investments are large, established wind and solar companies in Europe and elsewhere, which have reported big returns attached to the falling costs in renewables. Lansdown declined to share company names on the record.

The question is: Will this growth hold in 2020? Lekander, for one, thinks so, telling Business Insider that his portfolio is going to keep steady for the immediate future.

"This is not a one-year fad," he said. "I'm not changing anything." 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what happens to your brain when you get a concussion

Jeff Talpins' $18 billion Element Capital announced it would raise fees in 2019 and turned in a worse performance than the previous year — but still beat the average hedge fund

$
0
0

wall street

  • Macro manager Element Capital finished 2019 up 12%, a source familiar with the firm told Business Insider. 
  • Jeff Talpins' firm manages $18 billion and is raising performance fees to 40% this year, Bloomberg reported last summer. 
  • The firm also cut seven portfolio managers last year to refocus on the core macro strategy. The firm trailed the overall market this year, but finished above the average hedge fund. 
  • Visit BI Prime for more stories

$18 billion Element Capital hit 12% returns in 2019, trailing the surging stock market but beating the average hedge fund.

A source familiar with the performance told Business Insider that returns were spread equally across investments the firm made in foreign exchange, interest rates, and equities. 

Jeff Talpins' fund had a busy 2019 after posting 17% returns in 2018, when the average fund lost money. The firm increased performance fees to 40%, which took effect at the beginning of this year, and gave investors a chance to redeem before the fee bump in the hopes of shrinking the firm's AUM. The manager controlled $18.3 billion in the middle of 2019, and ended the year with $18 billion in assets. 

Element also cut seven portfolio managers because they were focused on "non-core" strategies, Bloomberg reported last year. Talpins manages a majority of the firm's assets, the article noted. 

The firm has returned average annual returns over the last five years is 15%, the source also said. 

Read more:In 2019, activists and stock pickers were hot — but Ray Dalio made a rare stumble and short sellers got crushed

Read more:Billionaire Larry Robbins' Glenview Capital crushes 2019 with eye-popping returns after a year that lost the firm billions

Read more:BlackRock's flagship hedge fund Obsidian returns more than 13% in 2019 after stumbling in August

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Joseph Edelman's $4.8 billion hedge fund dominated 2019 with 53.7% returns driven by big biotech bets

$
0
0

Science lab

  • Joseph Edelman's $4.8 billion Life Sciences fund, the flagship fund for the $6 billion Perceptive Advisors, returned 53.7% last year.
  • The firm's biggest fund lost more than 9% in August, but still rallied to beat the market and the average hedge fund, thanks to the performance of some of the biotech-focused fund's biggest names, like Global Blood Therapeutics and Mirati Therapeutics.
  • The firm announced at the end of last year the formation of a venture-capital fund of more than $200 million, increasing the firm's involvement in the private markets. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

An August tumble and increasingly loud calls for US healthcare industry reform weren't enough to slow billionaire Joseph Edelman's Perceptive Advisors.

The firm's $4.8 billion flagship fund, Life Sciences, scored a 53.7% return in 2019, even after losing 9% in August. In response to the fund's drop in August, COO Jim Mannix told Business Insider in an email that "no material negative catalysts that contributed to our August performance," and the year's overall outperformance bears this out.

The firm's head of investor relations and marketing, Patrick Murrow, told Business Insider that its biggest public positions drove performance — naming companies such as Global Blood Therapeutics, which had a drug for sickle-cell disease approved by the FDA in November, and Mirati Therapeutics, which saw its stock jump 28% in December thanks to a study on an ovarian cancer drug. 

The firm, which also operates two credit-opportunity funds that control roughly $1 billion in combined assets, rolled out its first venture fund at the end of last year, with $210 million in assets. The venture fund will focus on healthcare and biotech companies looking for Series A funding, while the main fund will continue to invest in private companies from Series B and subsequent funding rounds, Murrow said; the goal is to be a "one-stop shop" for promising biotech companies. 

"To be a good public investor, you have to be involved in the private markets," he said. 

The Life Sciences fund's performance beat the average hedge fund and the overall stock market, something many big-name funds were unable to do last year.

The fund's performance over its 21-year history has been a part of the draw for new managers and hedge fund investors getting into the healthcare and biotech space.

A Jefferies report from 2019 found healthcare to be the sector most equity hedge-fund investors were most interested in, and one of last year's biggest launches was Woodline Partners, a healthcare and tech-focused fund from two former Citadel portfolio managers. 

The increased competition and constant political chatter around healthcare and pharmaceuticals is not knocking Perceptive from its course, Murrow said. The firm plans to continue its bottom-up investing process — they meet with more than 500 companies a year — and hope any volatility from the US election can be used in their favor. 

"We like our opportunity set when the volatility comes," Murrow said. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Insiders explain how to navigate Steve Cohen's Point72 and climb from fresh college grad to managing tens of millions of dollars

$
0
0

point72 academy

  • Steve Cohen's Point72 Asset Management has put an emphasis on career development, according to Jaimi Goodfriend, the firm's head of investment professional development. 
  • New recruits, often straight out of undergrad, start their careers at Point72, going through a 10-month program known as the Academy, and, if they graduate, are often placed onto investment teams as analysts.
  • After becoming an analyst, the path becomes more varied. People choose to focus on becoming experts in their fields and advancing to senior analyst positions, or running their own teams as a portfolio manager — and the timelines for both jobs are not set in stone.
  • For analysts on the cusp of becoming a portfolio manager, the firm has a program known as the Nines, which focuses on managing people and risk as the head of a team, according to Jonathan Cain, a managing director at the firm. 
  • "Putting a time-stamp makes people focus on the next thing on the checklist," Goodfriend said. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

Going from fresh-out-of-college, brand-spanking-new analyst to running an investment team as a portfolio manager at Steve Cohen's Point72 isn't a linear path with obvious checkpoints.

That's something Jaimi Goodfriend, the firm's head of investment professional development, stressed in a conversation with Business Insider — there's not some plug-and-play plan that magically turns analysts into portfolio managers in a set number of years. 

But the firm has dedicated substantial resources to training the next generation of investment leadership at the $19 billion hedge fund based out of Stamford, Connecticut. In a conversation with fellow billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones at the Robin Hood Investment Conference in November, Cohen said "it's hard to hire people, and get it right," but the firm has "always been focused on" career development.

"Any resource I can provide to my people, I will," he said. 

The resources begin with the Academy, which Goodfriend runs. The 10-month program for soon-to-be analysts was set up in 2014 when they realized the best talent from universities weren't always ending up on Wall Street. 

The Academy started as something only for recruits just out of undergrad, but has now expanded to more young people starting their career in the investment management space. Many will have banking backgrounds, but Goodfriend said the firm has had a recruit that used to work at the White House and currently has a Navy SEAL in the Academy.

It starts with 10 weeks of what Goodfriend calls "hard skills"— learning how to model, how to analyze companies, accounting, and certain data-science techniques. Then recruits will spend time on different teams, getting work in different industries under different portfolio managers. 

If you graduate the academy and become an analyst on a team, you'll continue to get coaching from Goodfriend's unit, the investment professional development group, with coaches leading sessions to fill in the gaps on investing techniques that analysts aren't already learning from their portfolio managers and senior analysts.

"Your primary mentor as an analyst should be your portfolio manager," Goodfriend said. 

But where your career heads is up to you. The firm values its senior analysts, and finds the role calls to many new recruits. 

"We need senior analysts to be successful at this firm," she said, noting that people take pride in being seen as an expert in their field. 

"Steve would like an analyst to be here for a long time. Being a senior analyst as a career here is rewarded and celebrated."

But for analysts that do eventually want to lead their own teams, the firm operates what it calls the Nines program — a 10 would mean a person is completely ready to be a portfolio manager — to get wanna-be PMs ready. 

It's not the only way to become a portfolio manager at Point72. If a portfolio manager is brought in from outside the firm, they don't need to go through the program, which takes months on average, according to Jonathan Cain, a managing director at Point72 who helps run the Nines. 

Even internal candidates can become a PM without going through the program by running their own book under a long-tenured portfolio manager and getting mentored by them along the way. 

But the Nines program covers a lot more than investing techniques, Cain said. A big focus is on managing people, building the team, budgeting the group's expenses like trading, and measuring risk. 

"We want it so they're not building the plane while flying," Cain said. 

The firm considers it a "finishing school" for soon-to-be portfolio managers, and has even noticed how outside portfolio managers who join the firm end up wanting to spend longer in the program than they initially planned. 

"The whole idea is to be careful, very thoughtful," Cain said. 

"Talent is really scarce, and we want to put them in a position to succeed."

There's no set amount of time an analyst has to be in their role before they can progress to the Nines program, Cain said, but "the more experience, the better." The firm tries to impress on all the new recruits in the Academy that there isn't a checklist that will get you to the top.

"Putting a time stamp makes people focus on the next thing on the checklist," Goodfriend said.

"It's a much longer process and more involved process than just checking off a list."

Beyond being a top number-cruncher, Cohen is looking for investors that are creative, according to his conversation with Tudor Jones in November. 

"I want them to be idea generators. I want them to think about businesses as businesses," he said.

"You know, running a business is very much different than trading the stock or investing the stock. And I want my people to think about it how a company CEO would think."

Read more:Point72, Renaissance Technologies, and Millennium are trying to make quant strategies work in bond markets. Here's why their nascent credit-trading teams face an uphill battle.

Read more: The booming private market has some hedge funds spreading into private equity's domain. Now a tug-of-war has broken out over talent.

Read more:Silicon Valley has made top data-science talent too expensive for many hedge funds, so they're getting creative to compete

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

The world's top 20 hedge fund managers posted their biggest gains of the decade in 2019 — and returned $59.3 billion to their investors

$
0
0

ray dalio

  • The 20 best-performing hedge fund managers of all time gained $59.3 billion in 2019 to post their best annual return in at least a decade, according to a report released Monday by LCH Investments.
  • TCI manager Christopher Hohn led his fund to a $8.4 billion windfall last year, the largest return among the group of 20.
  • The best-performers bagged about one-third of the $178 billion taken in by hedge funds in 2019, LCH said.
  • Most funds still underperformed equities as the US stock market soared through 2019. The S&P 500 gained 29%, while the hedge fund industry saw a 9% gain in the same period, according to Bloomberg's Hedge Fund Indices.
  • Visit the Business Insider homepage for more stories.

The 20 best-performing hedge fund managers of all time gained $59.3 billion in 2019 to post their best annual return in at least a decade, according to an LCH Investments report released Monday.

Funds enjoyed major gains from surging stock and bond markets through the past year. TCI manager Christopher Hohn led his fund to a $8.4 billion windfall, the largest among the group of 20. Steve Mandel, manager of Lone Pine, took second place with a $7.3 billion gain.

The 20 best-performers bagged roughly one-third of the $178 billion taken in by hedge funds in 2019, according to the report.

Though many hedge funds posted their best gains in years, most lagged behind investors who focused on the US stock market. The hedge fund sector notched a 9% gain in 2019, according to Bloomberg's Hedge Fund Indices, well below the S&P 500's 29% gain through the year.

Last year's gains mark "a significant improvement after several years of muted returns," LCH chairman Rick Sopher told the Financial Times. The top 20 managers still posted moderate gains in 2018, though the hedge fund industry lost $41 billion of investor capital, the Times reported.

"The 'hedged' nature of hedge funds has resulted in them lagging way behind the returns of the equity markets in particular," Sopher added.

TCI's leading gain in 2019 placed it at 14th on the list of top 20 managers after not making the cut in 2018.

Ray Dalio's Bridgewater remained at the top spot despite its meager $600 million gain through the year. The fund holds $131.9 billion in assets under management, more than the next four best-performing funds combined.

Caxton Associates and Two Sigma lost their spots in the top 20 last year, the Times reported. Egerton, led by John Armitage, was the second fund to make its way onto the list in 2019 after TCI.

Lone Pine jumped from seventh to fourth place between 2018 and 2019, the biggest jump among funds included in the list across both years.

The hedge fund sector continued to shrink through 2019 despite the healthy returns. The industry saw more closures than openings for the fifth year in a row in 2019 as lofty fees and soaring stocks drove investors to other vehicles. Major players including David Tepper's Appaloosa and Louis Bacon's Moore Capital converted into family offices in 2019.

Appaloosa took 10th place on LCH's list, while Moore Capital sank to 19th from 15th in 2019.

Now read more markets coverage from Markets Insider and Business Insider:

Central banks band together to consider issuing their own digital currencies

Alphabet's soaring stock just pushed it above a $1 trillion market cap. Here are the 11 highest-valued public companies.

The stock market's biggest driver of gains is rapidly losing steam. One market expert lays out why it spells doom for investors, and how to safeguard your portfolio.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A big-money investor in juggernauts like Facebook and Netflix breaks down the '3rd wave' firms that are leading the next round of tech disruption

Greenlight Capital's David Einhorn tells investors why he's adding to his bet against Netflix, and say he's shorting corporate credit because ratings agencies have been 'complacent'

$
0
0

David Einhorn

  • David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital is short one of hedge funds' favorite stocks, streaming giant Netflix, because of increased competition from other streaming services and the loss of two series the service has had exclusively: "Friends" and "The Office."
  • The firm is also bracing for a recession with short positions against indices tracking US corporate credit and high-yield credit. It also has a long position in gold, among its top 10 positions. 
  • The firm scored nearly 14% returns for 2019, the letter states, driven by a return of 37.4% from its long positions. The firm's short positions, which also include a bet against the surging Tesla, lost money. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Netflix's stock bump at the end of 2019 — it's jumped more than 20% since the end of October — gave David Einhorn another chance to short it.

Einhorn's Greenlight Capital told investors in its fourth-quarter letter that the firm still thinks the streaming service is overvalued thanks to the entrance of new streaming services like Disney Plus, and the loss of series like "Friends" and "The Office." 

"To the extent the market sees the NFLX growth story as 'busted,' there is a lot of downside to the shares. At present, NFLX burns several billion dollars a year in cash and has accumulated a heavy debt load, even before considering future content commitments. Of course, NFLX could service the debt and de-lever by raising equity – but doing so would be a cold admission that the party is over. We doubt management will rush to do that," the letter states. 

Greenlight declined to comment on the letter. Netflix did not immediately return a request for comment. 

Greenlight returned nearly 14% in 2019 after a tough stretch, including a disastrous 2018, but the performance was driven by the firm's long positions. The firm's shorts, which includes a bet against Tesla, which Einhorn presented at the Sohn Investment Conference in New York in May, lost money for the year, the letter states. 

The firm is also bracing for a recession. Among its 10 largest positions are a long position on gold and a short against US corporate credit and high-yield credit. 

"Credit spreads are at cyclical tights even though (a) the economy appears to be decelerating, (b) we are far along in the economic cycle, (c) corporate debt has exploded, and (d) rating agencies have been complacent by allowing debt/EBITDA ratios to expand without downgrading the underlying credits. At current spreads, we believe that the risk/reward in corporate credit is asymmetric and unfavorable," the letter states about the credit environment.

The firm wrote that gold is "a hedge in our portfolio against adverse outcomes related" to the Federal Reserve's decision to cut interest rates while unemployment is low and the balance sheet is large. 

The firm also announced two new long positions it took in the fourth quarter in the letter: DXC Technologies and Software AG. DXC is a spin-out following the Hewlett Packard and Computer Sciences Corporation in 2017, and the Greenlight is high on its potential as continues to pay down its debt. Germany-based Software AG is moving to a subscription-based business that Greenlight believes will pay off. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how to escape a flooding vehicle

Bloomberg's alt-data head is starting up a new business at retail consultant Ascential — and it shows how firms can cut out middlemen and sell information directly to hedge funds

$
0
0

hedge funds and alt data 4x3

  • Ascential Alternative Data Division was started by Jeremy Baksht, who used to be Bloomberg's global head of alternative data. The London-based company helps consumer companies, like clothing lines, understand everything from their brand to their customers to their price points. 
  • The new division will focus on selling the datasets already created for the firm's primary clients to hedge funds and private-equity managers, while also building up a data-science and analysis team to create new data products.
  • "Most hedge funds and financial services clients are not trying to do a bottoms-up, fundamental prediction of revenue from alternative data. They want to know 'Is this good or bad?'" Baksht said. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

The super-competitive data world just added another challenger. 

Ascential is a London-based media and apparel consultant, using its array of data-focused subsidiaries to help its clients understand everything from their brand's appeal among young people to what's selling in different geographies to the perfect price point for a pair of shoes. 

But the company had added attracted a new kind of customer in recent years. More than a dozen hedge funds and private-equity managers reached out to the company to buy the same data it was already sending clients, according to Jeremy Baksht, Bloomberg's former global head of alternative data, who recently joined the Ascential to start a new unit: Ascential Alternative Data Division.

Tasked with selling to a new set of clients and creating new data products for these funds, the new division is a peek into a future where alternative-data companies could be skipped altogether in the data consumption process, with the original producer potentially bypassing firms like 1010data, Yodlee, and others, to sell directly to hedge funds.

Goldman Sachs is already scouring its own data to find insights to sell. 

The Ascential team is far off from displacing any long-time data vendors, but the pressures on alternative data players have been mounting thanks to increasingly sophisticated clients and new, deep-pocketed competitors

Ascential currently has five people in the new division, including Baksht, split between New York and London. The team in New York sits in the Times Square offices of WGSN, a division of Ascential that runs constant surveys on brands. 

"We have all these products here at the company," Baksht said. "We just haven't had someone dedicated to selling to this audience, who has a Wall Street background."

The fact the firm was able to bring in several "blue-chip" financial services clients without a dedicated team is what attracted Baksht to the firm; he knows how hard the sell can be to the top hedge funds. 

His goal is to deepen the relationships with financial services clients the firm already has while building out other products. For instance, he hopes to hire analysts to do more packaged datasets since the company had mostly been selling raw data. 

"Most hedge funds and financial services firm are not trying to do a bottoms-up, fundamental prediction of revenue from alternative data. They want to know 'Is this good or bad?'" he said. 

"That's exactly what we've been able to tell the firm's longtime clients for years." 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.


The alt-data industry faced serious growing pains after its sudden glow up — here's what players in the multi-billion-dollar space can expect for 2020

$
0
0

uses of alt data 4x3

  • Alternative data quickly went from a quirky subset used by only the most sophisticated hedge funds to a multi-billion-dollar behemoth that has investors and companies like Vista Equity Partners, Nasdaq, and Bloomberg diving in. 
  • Last year was an inflection point for the industry, which is adding new vendors every day and putting more and more pressure on long-time players. Once rock-solid business models have been upended, as hedge fund clients have grown more sophisticated and changed their preferences.
  • As Business Insider has reported, the rapidly changing space has rocked veteran players like Thasos, 7Park Data, and Jefferies' MScience.
  • Because clients want information that no one else has, promising startups have found it difficult to scale their businesses while also keeping the same quality of data.
  • Hedge fund managers tell Business Insider they are no longer looking for prepackaged data from vendors, but want more raw data streams that they can manipulate. 
  • Business Insider spoke to a dozen alt-data experts about what the space can expect in 2020 and beyond.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

To understand the big-picture story of alternative data, one could look no further than Greg Munves.

Munves joined 1010data fresh out of college in 2004 at a time when the term "alternative data" had barely even been coined. Back then, as he put it, "Big Data was very new to the world." 

Munves spent nearly 16 years there, which included two years as CEO, and went from dealing with an uneducated client base to a $500 million merger in 2015. 

But on January 17th, the industry veteran announced his departure from the Advance Publications-owned data provider on LinkedIn, adding 1010data to the growing list of alt-data sellers that have had management shakeups over the last 12 months.

Munves' career arc mirrors the path of the alt-data industry, going from a time when, as he wrote, "it wasn't a household term," to its current iteration, with hundreds of companies trying to pry off a chunk of what some analysts predict will eventually be a $7 billion market.  

The explosive growth of alternative data — unstructured, unique data sets that include everything from credit card transactions to satellite images — has led to attention from deep-pocketed investors eager to tap into the gold rush. But funding comes with high expectations for revenue and profits. 

Meanwhile, big names have barged in with their own offerings and platforms that come attached to well-known brands.

All of this has created an overcrowded, hyper-competitive environment in which the consumers — typically quantitative hedge funds — hold the power.  

1010data offers an example of a startup that is still operating and held in high esteem today after the sale, but there have been several cautionary tales after last year forced a reality check for many alternative data providers.

And this year may see more of the same.

"People are starting to question: Is every piece of alternative data worth it?" Mike Chen, director of portfolio management at $43 Panagora Asset Management, said. "People are starting to realize not everything is valuable. Not all that glitters is gold."

Business Insider spoke to a dozen insiders across the alt-data world to get a sense of the state of the market and what to expect in 2020. 

2019 a year of reckoning? 

After a year that concluded with back-to-back acquisitions of alt-data companies by larger players, it seemed as if the sky was the limit for the space in 2019. The truth was much closer to the ground. 

At least three different alt-data companies face similar issues, even though they all had different ownership structures. The underlying theme: their data wasn't selling enough. 

For Thasos, a geolocation data vendor, sales woes forced a major reduction in staff and a CEO change. Jefferies-owned MScience tried to pivot to a more data science-centric approach before making cuts to that team amid changes to its sales leadership. And 7Park Data amped up sales pressure after its $100 million sale to Vista Equity Partners.

For alt-data companies that were created when the space was still under the radar, a few hedge fund clients were more than enough to keep the lights on. The problem, though, was growth. 

Hedge funds are hard enough to keep as clients, industry experts say, as they quickly change preferences and are not shy about cutting vendors. And managers tell Business Insider they are no longer looking for prepackaged data from vendors, but want more raw data streams that they can manipulate. 

"I don't want anything that's rolled up," said Michael Recce, chief data scientist at Neuberger Berman, who once worked for Steve Cohen's Point72.

"I want rare data, I want slightly cooked," he added.

This change has forced vendors that once used to sell their research team's reports, like sell-side analysts at bulge-bracket banks, to transition to a more data science-heavy approach — all under the watchful eye of their hedge fund clients. 

"The conversations we have with vendors are about the intricacies of data collection, consistency of delivery, and timeliness, because we often aren't getting the most packaged product," said Caron Boneck, the chief data officer at Balyasny. 

Meanwhile, sellers of alt data must also cater more to less-sophisticated firms, such as fundamental hedge funds, that have shown an increasing interest in using alternative data but lack the expertise or resources to handle raw data sets. 

Industry experts said pricing of alternative data has evolved into a barbell-style model. Firms either charge high fees to a limited number of customers in order to maintain the data's rarity, or drop prices in hopes of the data becoming so widely used it is table stakes. 

A company's growth is limited with the former approach, but pushing data out to a wider audience comes with its own risks, Tammer Kamel, CEO at Nasdaq-owned Quandl, told Business Insider. 

"I think any proprietor of data aspires to get to that point ... Your price goes down, but your customer base grows faster than the rate your price decreases, so you continue to make more money," Kamel said. "If you start charging for the other end and get stuck in the middle, you might have a big problem."

More money (and attention and competitors), more problems

Picky customers aren't the only thing sellers of alt data need to contend with. Often times the biggest critics might reside within the company itself. 

Whether it was an outright acquisition by a traditional player (Nasdaq and Quandl) or private equity firm (Vista Equity Partners and 7Park), money poured into alternative data companies in recent years on the belief Wall Street's obsession with getting unique data sets would never end.

Investors weren't the only ones to recognize the opportunity, as seemingly any data scientist with some resources and the slightest bit of ingenuity launched their own offering.  

Data giants also took notice, with FactSet and Bloomberg eventually rolling out their own marketplaces in 2018 and 2019, respectively, where alternative data could be bought.

And that's not counting firms like Goldman Sachs or London-based marketing and advertising consultant Ascential that are trying to go at it alone by finding unique data sets they already own but have yet to be used.

The resulting environment is one that is highly competitive — to the point of being overcrowded. Buyers of alternative data tell Business Insider they've forgone answering their phone or replying to email due to the deluge of pitches. 

All of that comes as hedge funds have struggled to beat a surging stock market, leading to tough conversations with investors who question why they should pay high fees for a strategy that trails nearly-free index funds. 

And when one considers how difficult it can be to find a useful data set — experts estimate the share of alternative data sets the average hedge fund actually subscribes to after testing could be as low as 10% —it's not a surprise why the market has been so tough for sellers. 

"There is a huge cost into testing it for the firm. Couple that with a low hit rate. Couple that with it's the fifth person within the last two weeks that sells you on the same type of data sets or similar data sets, naturally it becomes a harder and harder game to play," Chen said. 

Still, some companies refuse to bow to any fears of potential oversaturation.

Data veteran Dan Entrup, who is the CEO of startup Datavore, said the industry struggles with pricing because too many firms view their data as the be-all and end-all, restricting the number of potential buyers able to afford their product.

"There's a lot of firms out there that try to say everyone needs [their product], and only [their product]," he said. 

Providers need to do a better job of pitching what "question can I answer with this data that I wasn't able to before," Entrup said.

Taking such an approach could require coordination between data providers with different, but possibly complementary, datasets that could be mixed to create a whole new product.

"It's really quite open at the moment at what you could do combining these datasets," said Naz Quadri, head of enterprise data science at Bloomberg.

The (10) million-dollar problem, and a possible savior

But not everyone sees the space as being in dire straits.

Lauren Stevens, the director of Open:FactSet data strategy at FactSet, has a more optimistic view. In addition to collecting and selling a bit of alternative data itself, FactSet partners with sellers, offering its wide-ranging distribution model in exchange for a cut of any sales.

Stevens told Business Insider that while there might be some overcrowding in the market, she still sees opportunity as a broader set of customers get comfortable with using the data. 

"As of now, we definitely see it being the early-majority stage. There isn't really a single client on the buy side where we are not having some discussion about both alternative data and technology," Stevens said. "Not every single partner or data category has had the same adoption rate, but the interest is definitely there."

Stevens isn't alone in seeing a bright spot. While nearly everyone interviewed acknowledged consolidation in the space would continue, most still believe there is value in the use of unique data sets. 

One potential customer segment, in particular, could prove to be space's saving grace. Big corporate clients are viewed by many as the holy grail due to the sheer size of addressable market. 

Marta Lopata, chief growth officer at alt-data seller Thinknum, told Business Insider that 2020 could be the year sellers make the use case for large companies to incorporate alt-data in their analysis. 

"I don't think the full validation will happen in 2020, but I think there will be some significant milestones and clarifications about what's possible and what's coming next," said Lopata about the opportunity of selling alt data to corporates. 

This could be the shift that will finally push alternative-data companies over the $10 million revenue hurdle that many get stuck on. Balyasny's Boneck said it's hard for firms to break into the next tier of growth with their current client base. 

But getting large companies to start ingesting complex data sets would be no easy task. Financial firms have a long history of figuring out ways to use data to help them generate higher returns. But the same cannot be said for every Fortune 500 company, many of which likely have a fraction of the number of data scientists on staff.

Even if an alt-data seller were to make inroads with corporates, the payoff isn't as high, according to Atit Amin, an associate at Pivot Investment Partners. The price point for a hedge fund or asset manager will always be higher than that of a corporate, which will have less-intense use cases for the data.

"Uncertain as to whether 2020 is when it materializes, largely because it is a much harder sell," said Amin of selling to large companies. "With corporates, it's a lot hard to navigate all the different layers and it's also harder to get sponsorship within corporates to use this data." 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Investors pulled $98 billion from hedge funds last year, the largest outflow the industry's seen since 2016

$
0
0

Sad trader

  • Hedge fund net outflows in 2019 were nearly $98 billion, according to a Thursday report from eVestment.
  • It marked the worst year for hedge fund redemptions since 2016, according to the report. 
  • Hedge funds returned about 9.2% in 2019, according to Bloomberg data, while the S&P 500 gained 31%. 
  • Going forward, there will continue to be assets invested in hedge funds, "but win-rates, the measure of broad enjoyment of new money, have likely peaked," according to the report. 
  • Read more on Business Insider.

Hedge funds had a rough 2019, and investors noticed. 

Over the course of the entire year, investors pulled nearly $98 billion out of hedge funds, according to a Thursday report from eVestment. In December alone, investors redeemed about $16.21 billion from hedge funds, the report showed. 

The negative year-to-date net flows were the largest in the industry since 2016, and accounted for roughly 3% of total assets under management in the industry, according to the report. It also marked the second consecutive annual outflow for the industry, a feat that hasn't happened since the financial crisis. 

"Though December was not as bad as many past Decembers, there is no masking that the month's flows are emblematic of what was one of the more difficult years the industry has faced," eVestment wrote in the report.  

The outflows came amid a year where hedge funds largely underperformed the broader market. In 2019, more funds closed than opened for the fifth year in a row as weak returns and high fees pushed investors away. On average, hedge funds gained 9.2% last year, according to Bloomberg. That's significantly below the performance of the S&P 500, which returned 31% in 2019. 

Despite investors fleeing hedge funds, total assets under management rose about 4% to $3.3 trillion in 2019 as performance offset some of the redemption pressure, according to eVestment data. 

Going forward, there will continue to be assets invested in hedge funds, "but win-rates, the measure of broad enjoyment of new money, have likely peaked," according to the report. 

While there were some winners — 37% of funds saw inflows in 2019— the industry is increasingly becoming a place where only the best survive and overarching success is a thing of the past, the report showed. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A big-money investor in juggernauts like Facebook and Netflix breaks down the '3rd wave' firms that are leading the next round of tech disruption

Billionaire Seth Klarman blames low rates and 'capitalist excess' for his fund's languishing returns — and says we've seen only the 'tip of the overvaluation iceberg'

$
0
0

Seth Klarman

  • Billionaire Seth Klarman's annual letter to investors touched on topics such as private equity's pile of unused money, modern monetary theory, WeWork, and foreign policy in the Middle East.
  • The 17-page letter seen by Business Insider showed that the $30 billion fund returned less than 10% in a year when the stock market surged by 30%.
  • Klarman blamed value stocks' continued slump and a "few mistakes" he didn't identify. 
  • Klarman is not questioning his belief in value investing, writing that "major mispricings are eventually corrected — the share price and value of a business tend to converge — because short-term illusions are pierced and enduring characteristics become more apparent."
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

One of the most well-known value investors didn't see much upside from his uncompromising position in 2019.

Billionaire Seth Klarman's Boston-based Baupost Group posted returns in the high single digits in 2019 while the broader stock market more than tripled that.

But the underperformance has not shaken the "Oracle of Boston." And that's even after Steve Mandel's Lone Pine Capital told investors last year that value investing has changed forever.

"Major mispricings are eventually corrected — the share price and value of a business tend to converge — because short-term illusions are pierced and enduring characteristics become more apparent," he wrote in a 17-page letter seen by Business Insider that touched on a wide variety of topics, including foreign policy, WeWork's ex-CEO Adam Neumann, and modern monetary theory.

A Baupost spokesperson declined to comment on the contents of the letter.

The effects of low interest rates

In November, Klarman's fellow hedge-fund billionaire Ray Dalio said at the Greenwich Economic Forum that low interest rates have allowed companies to sell "dreams instead of earnings."

Klarman went a step further, blaming low and negative interest rates for the widening inequality that has allowed populism to rise and the boom in private equity and venture-capital money that fueled companies like WeWork. 

He called Neumann's $1.7 billion WeWork exit package the "epitome of capitalist excess."

On unicorns in general, he saw holes being filled with money that might not be around in an economic downturn. He named Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Netflix as examples.

"Because of favorable terms offered to preferred shareholders, the common shares of many of these firms are overstated in value, sometimes dramatically so. A skeptic could make the case that this preferred-to-common adjustment is merely the tip of the overvaluation iceberg for these high-flying and often profitless upstarts," he wrote about unicorns that have been funded by venture capital.

Klarman has concerns beyond the seemingly limitless money flying around the private sector; he called modern monetary theory, an economic theory supported by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, "a new madness."

"Running massive budget deficits in a period of strong economic growth puts the U.S. on the road to MMT and money printing without end, in service of a permanent prosperity that has always eluded mankind. MMT, in the hands of astonishingly short-term oriented and self-serving politicians, would raise the risk of out of control inflation, the loss of public confidence in money and, indeed, in government itself, and potentially accelerate the unraveling of social cohesion," he wrote.

The Trump-'Big Bang Theory' analogy

Klarman appears to be familiar with CBS's popular sitcom "The Big Bang Theory."

In the letter, he compared a constant target of his criticism, President Donald Trump, to a frequent gag on the show known as "Anything Can Happen Thursday." (In the show, Klarman wrote, the characters decide to eat somewhere different on Thursday, when anything can happen.)

"'Anything can happen' is not limited to Thursdays, and the subject isn't dinner but democracy, prosperity, global alliances, societal institutions, and truth itself. These days, literally anything can happen in foreign policy, immigration policy, cabinet appointments, and White House staff turnover. One day, the president is distracted by the size of his crowds; another day, it's a debate over who said what about the path of a storm or the demand to acquire Greenland from Denmark," he wrote.

Klarman, who was a longtime Republican donor before the Trump administration, donated heavily to Democrats in the 2018 midterm elections. He still calls out Democrats in the letter, though, saying "with Democrats and Republicans evidently focused largely on preventing each other from claiming victories or accomplishing anything, there is a ubiquitous sense that nothing can get done in Washington."

He said the policies of presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and the primary process has pulled the party too far left, calling proposals like a marginal tax rate of 70%, the Green New Deal, "Medicare for All," and the "possible imposition of a wealth tax" impractical and unaffordable. 

"The left's response to the extremism of Donald Trump may be an equal and opposite reaction of extremism, in the form of an aggressive attack on the corporate sector and the wealthy without concern for the inevitable implications on economic growth and job creation," he wrote. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

After a $1 billion launch, Diamondback founders Richard Schimel and Larry Sapanski lost money in their first quarter of trading for new fund Cinctive Capital

$
0
0

Richard Schimel Cropped

  • Cinctive Capital, the new $1 billion fund from Diamondback founders Richard Schimel and Larry Sapanski, lost money in its first quarter of trading, sources tell Business Insider.
  • The fund, which is still putting money to work and hiring its team, posted -2% net returns and -1% gross returns for the fourth quarter. The firm began trading at the end of September. 
  • Schimel was in charge of Citadel's now-shuttered Aptigon business for two years before founding Cinctive with Sapanski, who was the chief investment officer of family office Imua T Capital for the previous couple of years. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

One of 2019's hottest launches stumbled out of the gate.

Sources tell Business Insider that Cinctive Capital — the $1 billion launch by Diamondback founders Richard Schimel and Larry Sapanski — posted a net loss of roughly 2% in the fourth quarter after launching in late September. The firm's gross loss was roughly 1% for the quarter, sources said, but the firm is up to start 2020. 

The manager, which is based in New York's Hudson Yards district, is still in the process of building out its team and putting money to work, a source familiar with the firm said, pushing expenses higher than normal for the quarter. 

Schimel is one of several big-name Citadel alums to launch last year, joining Jack Woodruff, who founded Candlestick Capital, and Mike Rockefeller and Karl Kroeker, who started healthcare-and-technology-focused Woodline Partners. Schimel ran Citadel's now-closed Aptigon stock-picking unit for roughly two years, and previously founded Sterling Ridge Capital. 

Sapanski was the chief investment officer of his family office, Imua T Capital, for the last couple years; before that, he founded Scoria Capital, which he ran from 2013 to 2017. 

The pair are most well-known for Diamondback Capital, which they co-founded after working at Steve Cohen's SAC Capital together as portfolio managers. The firm was eventually undone by an insider trading probe that resulted in a Diamondback portfolio manager being found guilty in a trial. The conviction was eventually overturned, however, and an appeals court even forced the SEC to pay back Diamondback the $9 million the regulatory body fined the hedge fund. 

Cinctive was backed by two large investors, the Employees Retirement System of Texas and Pacific Alternative Asset Management Prisma's hedge fund launch program. A press release about the firm when it launched noted that Cinctive had 11 portfolio managers when Schimel and Sapanski began trading. The management team includes Sapanski's brother, Richard; Point72's former head of research, Marc Greenberg; and Aptigon's former director of research, Alison Smith.

SEE ALSO: Julian Robertson's Tiger Management is at the center of a quarter-trillion-dollar web linking billionaires, the Pharma Bro, and a 'Big Short' main character

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Hedge funds are flocking to Miami this week in search of new money — here's why they're taking a speed-dating approach to meet allocators

$
0
0

An activist dressed as Scrooge McDuck throws counterfeit money from a golden mountain onto protesters during a demonstratio

  • Investors streamed out of the hedge fund industry in 2019, with more than $16 billion leaving in December alone, according to data-tracker eVestment.
  • Small hedge fund managers are facing an uphill battle in raising funds, which many of them need thanks to the rising cost of technology, data, and compliance industry-wide. Conferences like the upcoming Context Summits in Miami hope to make it a little more manageable.
  • "There's an investor for every fund that's profitable — it's just finding that right pair off."
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

Jon Caplis is remarkably optimistic about an industry that saw nearly $100 billion walk out the door last year.

Caplis runs consultant PivotalPath, which tracks hedge funds on behalf of institutional investors, and sees "a lot of good tailwinds right now" for the $3.3 trillion hedge fund space. 

With big-name closures, investors' appetite for private equity growing, and a lagging launch environment, it may be hard to see any upside, but Caplis is confident in the quality of launches last year and the promise of relatively niche managers that are not well-known names.

"They are specialists, they know exactly what they are doing in their space, and they are a lot of opportunities that are event-driven and therefore idiosyncratic," Caplis said about some of the smaller hedge funds in the industry. 

They just need to raise enough money to stay in business.  Increased costs for technology, data, and compliance have made it harder for smaller funds to launch, and for existing funds to compete with bigger ones.

At this week's Context Summits conference in Miami, hundreds of hedge funds — primarily smaller managers, though big-names like AQR, Kirkoswald, York Capital, and others will also be there — have paid to go on a series of speed dates with institutions, pensions, and more in the hopes of raising significant capital.

For many managers, this way of fundraising is the only one that's justifiable.

"Raising money continues to be difficult, and that hasn't really changed very much in recent years," said Jeff Meyers of Cobia Capital, an equity hedge fund that is among the Tiger family tree

A conference like Context makes sense for a fund like Cobia because allocators "have to fill up their slots, and I think the bar is a little lower to get a meeting at the conference than it would be if we were trying to meet during the normal course of business."

Shawn Kravetz, founder of Esplanade Capital Partners, said he's never actively tried to raise money or market his firm's two funds in the two decades he has been running the manager, but decided to go to Context this year to get his solar-energy fund in front of investors. 

"At the end of the day, I am an investor, not a marketer. I don't think about flying around the world 24/7, pitching investors all day," he said. Context is a "highly concentrated and efficient way" to meet a lot of people, he added. 

But the problem with being one of an endless parade of meetings is you'll be compared to everyone else at the conference, said Mark Aldoroty, head of prime services at BNY Mellon's Pershing. 

"You have to be prepared to explain why you're different," he said.

Meyers said when Cobia attended the conference two years ago, the firm didn't wind up raising any money from the meetings it had — but he is more confident this time around, thanks to a better stretch of recent performance. He is aware of the comparison factor Aldoroty mentioned, but still prefers Context to trying to getting dozens of meetings with investors when they are scattered across the country. 

"Probably good to be their first or last meeting of the day, but you obviously can't control that," he said with a laugh.

 Even for funds that don't raise money, being at a conference will always help for networking, Aldoroty said. 

"There's an investor for every fund that's profitable —  it's just finding that right pair-off."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Billionaire York Capital founder and Milwaukee Bucks co-owner Jamie Dinan says investing in the US requires a 'rifle shot' approach and explains why European banks offer a big opportunity

$
0
0

jamie dinan

  • Jamie Dinan, the founder of $17.6 billion York Capital and a co-owner of the NBA's Milwaukee Bucks, told attendees of Context Summits in Miami that Japan, a post-Brexit United Kingdom, and deleveraging European banks are all attractive areas in the market.
  • Dinan said that you need to have a "rifle-shot" approach to invest in the US and be uncorrelated with the overall market.
  • Within the US, he still thinks there are opportunities around mergers and in the credit markets for investors who look hard enough though.
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories

Jamie Dinan is going to put his investors' money to work. 

While renowned investors like Seth Klarman and Warren Buffett load up on cash, York Capital's founder believes that if he can't find opportunities to invest, "I'm not looking hard enough."

"It's our problem, not the market's problem," he said during a talk at the Context Summits conference in Miami.

The billionaire co-owner of the NBA's Milwaukee Bucks said the opportunities he is watching right now are in Japan, following corporate governance reform that has let activism grow in the country, a post-Brexit United Kingdom, and deleveraging European banks. 

Those banks, he said, are being forced to sell off parts of their balance sheets at what he considers to be a discount.

"Buy things from people that don't want to sell you stuff," he said.

His $17.6 billion firm takes a "rifle-shot" approach to investing in the US though to produce uncorrelated returns as the stock market continues to surge. He finds opportunities around mergers and in the credit markets, he said, but US equities are challenging — not dissimilar, he said, to the run-up before the dot-com bubble crashed. 

Right now, he said, if you short the S&P, you're "really shorting the winners." 

"Your risk-adjust returns might be good, but the absolute return numbers aren't," he said.

And, he said, the investor ultimately focuses more on the absolute number. 

"You're the chef, so you know what you put in the dish, all the ingredients, but the customer only knows what you're serving them." 

See also: Hedge funds are flocking to Miami this week in search of new money — here's why they're taking a speed-dating approach to meet allocators

See also:Famed investor Michael Novogratz said psychedelics will be the next 'short-term bubble' after cannabis — and predicts Compass Pathways will go public this year

See also:A 'Billions' cocreator explains how he cracked into the secretive world of hedge funds to make the show realistic

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Coronavirus fallout 'certainly ruined the environment' for market bulls, hedge fund billionaire David Tepper says

$
0
0

david tepper

  • The threat coronavirus poses to global markets "certainly ruined the environment" for long-term investors, Appaloosa Management founder David Tepper told TheStreet on Saturday.
  • The billionaire told CNBC just two weeks ago that he and his hedge fund "have been long and continue that way."
  • Tepper also warned against taking additional risks until the outbreak subsides, saying "if you're a long-term person, you better not be leveraged."
  • Visit the Business Insider homepage for more stories.

David Tepper told CNBC on January 17 that he and his hedge fund "have been long and continue that way." Two weeks later, the billionaire investor is warning of new risks in such positions.

US stocks have tumbled from their record highs as coronavirus fears grip investors, and uncertainty around the outbreak could keep markets from recovering in the near term, the founder of Appaloosa Management told TheStreet on Saturday.

"Certainly ruined the environment of the set up right now," Tepper said. "You'll have to be careful because it may be a game changer. So you just gotta be cautious."

The outbreak is already responsible for more than 360 deaths as of February 3, and more than 17,400 people are infected. A man in the Philippines became the first to die of the virus outside of China on Saturday.

Economies around the world are also taking hits from the virus. China is reportedly eyeing a cut to its 2020 growth forecast as the outbreak's rapid expansion through the country prompted factory closures, quarantines, and travel bans. JPMorgan analyst Haibin Zhu lowered his first-quarter China GDP estimate to 4.9% from 6.3% on Wednesday.

Chinese stocks tanked as much as 9.1% on Monday as trading opened for the first time since January 23. US futures generally ignored China's sell-off, with all three major indexes up at least 1.1% following a Friday tumble.

Tepper noted that investors holding on to their long positions should avoid any additional exposure until virus-related risks cool.

"If you're a long-term person, you better not be leveraged," the billionaire said.

The fund manager announced in 2019 that he would return capital to investors and convert Appaloosa to a family office in the near future. The fund holds about $14 billion in assets under management, according to CNBC.

Following the fund's conversion, Tepper plans to focus on the Carolina Panthers, an NFL team he recently bought. He's also backing the creation of a Major League Soccer team in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Now read more markets coverage from Markets Insider and Business Insider:

The 'watch has ended': Members of the Robinhood Reddit forum are roasting the platform as Fidelity releases fractional share trading

'Trampled by a Tesla Semi': Tesla's post-earnings spike burns $1.5 billion of short bets in a single day

Microsoft, Mondelez, and Canada Goose look for people who thrive amid constant change. Here's how they measure adaptability in job candidates — and how to know if you fit the bill.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A big-money investor in juggernauts like Facebook and Netflix breaks down the '3rd wave' firms that are leading the next round of tech disruption


It can take years for a hedge fund to get a check from the most sophisticated investors, and one billionaire founder thinks that's unfair to smaller managers

$
0
0

jamie dinan

  • Hedge-fund investors like university endowments and foundations require managers to take a years-long selling approach, and that's ramping up pressure on new launches hoping to make it.
  • The more institutional approach has made it hard for new managers to get traction in an increasingly competitive industry, according to billionaire Jamie Dinan, who has run York Capital for nearly 30 years.
  • "It's really not fair," he said at a conference in Miami last week.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

 Of the more than 450 hedge funds Goldman Sachs' prime brokerage team has helped launch over the last decade, half of them have closed. Of the ones that have closed, a majority were shut down in the first three years.

But the industry's most sophisticated investors, like endowments, pensions, and foundations, require years of back-and-forth before they decide to invest in a new manager — when a multi-million-dollar check could mean the difference between shutting down and staying open.

"This is a very long sales process," said Ron Biscardi, the chief executive of Context Capital Partners, which connects family offices and hedge funds. 

"People are not going to write 10, 20, 30 million-dollar checks immediately."

It's another example of the increasing institutionalization of the hedge-fund space, driven by the industry's investor base. One billionaire investor thinks it has gone too far.

"It's really not fair," said Jamie Dinan, founder of York Capital Management, at the Context Summits conference in Miami last week. 

"It's hard to get traction now" as a small manager, he said. 

When Dinan founded York nearly 30 years ago, he said, he "wouldn't have checked any boxes" that the big investors require before giving millions to a new manager. That include things like quality service providers, a long track record, and a thought-out data strategy. 

"The only box they had to check was 'do I think this guy is going to make money,'" York said. "You could stand out" 30 years ago. 

On a panel discussion at Context, representatives from endowments and foundations confirmed the long sales process, but insisted they had good reason for it. The number of hedge funds has exploded over the last 15 years, and investors became hyper-alert after the Madoff Ponzi scheme. 

"The dating process is years-long," said Brooke Jones, the director of investments for the Carnegie Corporation. 

One hedge fund manager who launched in 2015 told Business Insider that it took four years of constant meetings and communication with one large endowment before they got a check. 

The years-long sale leans heavily on the qualitative review, since a good number of managers can make it through the quantitative screening now. 

"It takes a long time to get to know someone," said Donna Snider, managing director of the $4 billion Kresge Foundation, and it is not going to happen in "an hour-and-a-half-long meeting when everyone is on their best behavior." She even warned managers at the conference that she and other investors are keeping an eye on them at the bar at night.

What this change means is that hedge funds need to prioritize marketing early on if they want to survive, Biscardi said. Too many funds can't survive their first three years because they are not able to raise sufficient capital to keep the lights on.

"To be a good successful manager now, you have to be good at [marketing] too," he said.

Biscardi echoed a point Dinan had made to drive that idea home: "Money no longer finds you if you're making good returns." 

 

See also: Hedge funds are flocking to Miami in search of new money — here's why they're taking a speed-dating approach to meet allocators

See also:What it's like to launch a hedge fund when even the biggest managers are struggling and long-short equity is a 'dirty word'

See also: The machines running a huge chunk of public markets will only get smarter, and that's putting private equity and stock-pickers on a collision course

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Billionaire hedge-fund founder Lee Ainslie is worried his generation is going to be remembered as 'the generation of greed'

$
0
0

Lee Ainslie

  • Billionaire hedge-fund founder Lee Ainslie said that he believes his generation will be considered the "generation of greed" by young people.
  • The founder of Maverick Capital, speaking at an Economic Club of NY Event in Midtown Manhattan, said the impact his age group has had on national debt and the environment is undeniable.
  • While he said he is OK with paying higher taxes, he told the audience that he is not sure the government is the best method for redistributing wealth.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Add billionaire hedge-fund founder Lee Ainslie to the growing chorus of people in the 1% who believe the country's current path is unsustainable. 

He told attendees of an Economic Club of NY event in Manhattan on Monday night that he thinks his generation — he was born in 1964, right at the end of the Baby Boomers cohort — will be remembered as the "generation of greed," especially compared to the prior generation, nicknamed the "Greatest Generation" for fighting in World War II.

Ainslie, a protege of Julian Robertson and founder of Maverick Capital, pointed to the rising national debt load and the impact his generation has had on the environment as examples that younger generations will remember about Boomers.

"I'm not sure the world of the finance can solve this," he said, talking about the social strife caused by income inequality. 

He mentioned that he doesn't mind paying higher taxes, but questioned if the government is the right agency to redistribute wealth in the country — but said he's "not sure there is another way."

Billionaires like Warren Buffett, Ray Dalio, and Bill Gates have all called for higher taxes on the richest in society, citing the social strife caused by income inequality. 

He declined to name a political candidate he was supporting in the presidential election but said that he was told by a prominent macro manager that if Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders becomes the Democratic nominee, the markets would react positively — because this macro manager believes neither of them would be able to beat Trump. 

In 2016, Ainslie gave more than $66,000 to a Hillary Clinton super PAC, but previously gave money to Jeb Bush when he was still in the running for the Republican nomination. He also donated to both the Mark Warner, a Democratic senator from Ainslie's home state of Virginia, and Richard Burr, a Republican senator from North Carolina. 

He identified a Mike Bloomberg presidency as one that might rattle the markets since he would try to address the national debt load instead of adding to it — something Ainslie thinks is necessary but would be painful in the short-term. 

"I'm amazed it's just kind of fallen away from the political discourse," he said about the national debt. 

"It's clearly unsustainable." 

See also:The CEO of one of the biggest US office-space owners answered a rapid-fire Q&A with a prediction that Bloomberg will be president

See also:Billionaire Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman told us why he thinks the far left 'could be exceptionally disruptive' to the US economy

See also: Julian Robertson's Tiger Management is at the center of a quarter-trillion-dollar web linking billionaires, the Pharma Bro, and a 'Big Short' main character

SEE ALSO: The CEO of one of the biggest US office-space owners answered a rapid-fire Q&A with a prediction that Bloomberg will be president

SEE ALSO: Julian Robertson's Tiger Management is at the center of a quarter-trillion-dollar web linking billionaires, the Pharma Bro, and a 'Big Short' main character

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Billionaire Avenue Capital founder Marc Lasry says the decision to pay hundreds of millions to buy the Milwaukee Bucks 6 years ago was 'the best investment I've ever made'

$
0
0

Marc Lasry

  • At an event in Manhattan on Tuesday night, Avenue Capital founder Marc Lasry discussed his purchase of the NBA's Milwaukee Bucks, which he made six years ago with fellow billionaire Wes Edens.
  • The investment has soared thanks to new media deals between the league and its broadcast partners, but Lasry thinks it still has room to grow.
  • He said the demand for live sports is unique among all other entertainment options. 
  • Click here for more BI Prime stories.

Billionaire Marc Lasry said he thought he was going to be a professional basketball player when he was a kid. 

While he played in college for one season at Clark University in Massachusetts, the founder of Avenue Capital ended up going to law school and then making billions of dollars as an investor. 

But he found his way back to the game when he and fellow billionaire Wes Edens bought the NBA's Milwaukee Bucks in 2014 for $550 million (fellow hedge-fund billionaire Jamie Dinan is now a co-owner as well). 

His love for basketball didn't stop him from evaluating the company like any other asset though, he told attendees at an event in midtown Manhattan on Tuesday night. 

"When I bought it, I thought we were buying a media company," he said, because the league's agreements with its broadcast partners were set to renegotiated. Now, the basketball team is estimated to be worth more than $1.3 billion, and recent purchases by Steve Ballmer and Tilman Fertitta of the Los Angeles Clippers and Houston Rockets, respectively, were over $2 billion. 

"I think it's been the best investment I've ever made," said Lasry, who used his newfound clout in the league to play in the 2016 celeb game that is a part of the All-Star Game festivities. Lasry expects the league and its franchises to continue to grow in value thanks to the demand for live sports.

He mentioned how companies like Facebook and Twitter were looking for events that people wanted to watch live. 

"Everyone wants an asset that today gives you something live," he said. 

The team has done well under Lasry, advancing to the conference championship last year before falling to the Toronto Raptors. He said he and the other owners take a financier approach to managing the team, which can occasionally irk the basketball operations staff.

For example, when the team wants to play one player $20 million a year, and another $2 million a year, Lasry said he asks if the first player is ten times better since that's what their salaries suggest — something that gets shut down by the team's management. 

"The amount of time we spend going through on value makes the basketball people very upset," he said.

He also compared building a team at Avenue or any finance company to the work of building a basketball team, saying there's also a question of whether to value character or talent more.

"We'd rather have character," he said, telling the audience that each player on the team is "a great individual." 

He said he doesn't see himself selling anytime soon, despite the return the team has generated for him so far — maybe one example of how this investment is different than others he'd make. 

"It's been a blast." 

See also: Fortress CEO Wes Edens didn't show up to board meetings while his private-equity firm racked up a $115 million tab managing local newspaper chain GateHouse

SEE ALSO: Fortress CEO Wes Edens didn't show up to board meetings while his private-equity firm racked up a $115 million tab managing local newspaper chain GateHouse

SEE ALSO: Billionaire hedge-fund founder Lee Ainslie is worried his generation is going to be remembered as 'the generation of greed'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Billionaire Bill Ackman's Pershing Square just exited its positions in Starbucks and ADP with big gains, a new investor presentation reveals

$
0
0

bill ackman

  • Billionaire Bill Ackman's Pershing Square has sold its stake in Starbucks in January, a new investor presentation shows. The firm exited stakes in ADP and United Technologies last year. 
  • The $8.5 billion fund manager returned 58.1% last year thanks to Chipotle and Hilton investments.
  • Ackman bought into his Starbucks position in October of 2018 and ADP position in May 2017. The firm sold out of Starbucks completely on the last day of January and ADP in June of last year.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Billionaire Bill Ackman is getting out of another investment that saw him tangle with management.

Pershing Square's latest investor presentation shows the firm selling out of its investment in ADP in June of last year after taking a proxy fight to the data-processing company at the end of 2017. The presentation states the firm sold its stake in the company at $167 a share after buying at less than $100 per share. 

The $8.5 billion hedge fund manager also sold its stake in Starbucks at the end of January, the presentation states, because "prospective returns became more modest following a total shareholder return of 73% in the 19 months that we owned Starbucks."

The sale of the firm's ADP stake came before another activist investment Ackman left recently.

The firm also sold out of United Technologies last year due to a merger with Raytheon that Ackman opposed so much he wrote a letter to the CEO of United Technologies when the deal was reported in the press.

Ackman and former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz traded barbs in 2013 about Ackman's investment in JC Penny, but Schultz was no longer the CEO of the coffee chain when Ackman invested. 

In 2018, Ackman also exited his long-running bet against Herbalife that he made waves for. 

Pershing's 2019 was stellar, with Chipotle and Hilton fueling annual returns of 58.1%. The investor presentation stated that no position lost money for the year. 

The presentation was also the first time the firm discussed a new investment to Ackman's portfolio, Agilent Technologies, which sells instruments used by scientists. The presentation states that the company has a regulatory moat that protects its business, and peers in the space trade for much higher despite Agilent being the larger player in the space. 

"Management is targeting 50 to 70bps of annual margin expansion over next few years," the presentation states. "We estimate >800bps margin opportunity based on best-in-class peer." 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Wall Street's battle for data-science talent has gone next-level as Silicon Valley makes more East Coast hires and other industries get hip to data — here's how firms are fighting back

$
0
0

hedge fund trader

  • There is growing demand for data-science talent across industries, and while Wall Street and other finance companies might be improving its reputation in these circles, it hasn't gotten any easier to find the right people.
  • Hedge funds are feeling pressure from Silicon Valley darlings, which are growing their presence on the East Coast, as well as other industries who are beginning to realize the value of crunching their own data.
  • At some funds, like Point72, data scientists are so in-demand that some even have longer non-compete periods than the portfolio managers making the investments. 
  • "Data is just a huge piece of what everyone is doing now."
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Uber and Lyft have struggled since going public, while Facebook has become a favorite punching bag for politicians thanks to its privacy scandals, but even those dings against Big Tech haven't helped finance's pitch much when trying to lure data-crunchers. 

Data scientists and others that can harness and monetize the exploding number of data streams pouring into the investment management industry have been in high demand, from quant funds and fundamental stock-pickers alike.

The challenge for recruiting this type of talent historically has been the competition from Silicon Valley startups that can offer a more familiar consumer brand name as well as the lure of upside in the form of equity in a pre-IPO company.

Recruiters and hedge funds told Business Insider that this challenge still exists, despite Silicon Valley's high-profile setbacks, and new obstacles have emerged on top of that.

We aren't competing with just tech for this talent, said Hinesh Kalian, director of data science for Man Group. Other industries like logistics, retail, and advertising are beginning to crunch data as well.

"My expectation is that the role of data scientists has become commonplace across all industries," he said. 

For some big hedge funds, data scientists have become just as valuable as the money managers; occasionally at Steve Cohen's Point72, for example, data scientists will have longer non-compete clauses than the portfolio manager they are working with, sources tell Business Insider. Point72 declined to comment.

Big tech companies' expansions on the East Coast, like Google's New York campus and Amazon's investment in northern Virginia, has also added to the difficulty of recruiting data scientists, said Ryan Tolkin, the chief investment officer of Schonfeld Strategic Advisors.

Previously, he said, finance was able to recruit students from top schools on the East Coast who didn't want to move out west. 

"I think if anything is becoming more and more competitive," Tolkin said. 

Finance has improved its standing in the data science world, several industry observers say. But hedge funds' performance lately doesn't exactly help them sell themselves. 

Jason Schulman, a managing director for recruiting firm Long Ridge Partners, said people in tech "may be more receptive to moving over to finance now," but last year was not only tough for Silicon Valley — several of the most popular hedge funds for data crunchers had tough years. 

AQR and WorldQuant both started 2020 with layoffs, and Bridgewater lost money for the year. And while fundamental managers are coming around to the idea of bringing on data scientists, the "merging" has been hard, Schulman said. Balyasny last year cut a team that mixed quant and fundamental strategies, known as Synthesis, and was running a $2 billion book. 

"Some of the funds are still trying to figure out how to intersect" the two disciplines, Schulman said. 

For hedge funds to continue to compete for top tech talent, Tolkin believes the lines between hedge funds and private equity will have to continue to blur so capital is more permanent. A couple quarters of high costs due to a big tech build-out or a recruiting efforts can't scare off investors, he said. There are projects that his firm has undergone that haven't shown returns for more than a year, but were necessary. 

"You also need to have scale, because the industry has gotten so expensive," he said. 

At Man Group, the relationship the firm has with Oxford University has helped introduce some young talent to the firm early on, Kalian said. The ideal candidate for the firm, though, is not someone fresh out of undergrad — Man is looking for someone who is two years out of university, Kalian said, and has a master's or PhD in a field like statistics or machine-learning. 

Kalian said Man Group's data scientists need to be able to communicate what they are finding in the data to a degree that isn't required in other industries, because they are often searching for the answer to a question within the data itself.

"It's not as narrow of a role as it might be in the tech world," he said.

Recruiting "hasn't gotten any easier," and isn't expected to, according to Schulman.

"Data is just a huge piece of what everyone is doing now."

 

See also: The machines running a huge chunk of public markets will only get smarter, and that's putting private equity and stock-pickers on a collision course

SEE ALSO: Balyasny just cut 10 people running a $2 billion book. The hedge fund axed the 1-year-old team because of poor performance, sources say.

SEE ALSO: The machines running a huge chunk of public markets will only get smarter, and that's putting private equity and stock-pickers on a collision course

SEE ALSO: The head of professional development at Steve Cohen's Point72 explains how to climb from fresh college grad to portfolio manager at the $16 billion hedge fund firm

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: WeWork went from a $47 billion valuation to a failed IPO. Here's how the company makes money.

Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>