Quantcast
Channel: Hedge Funds
Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live

Hedge funds have started bashing themselves — here's what they're saying

$
0
0

sad crying baby

It's no secret that hedge fund performance is lagging.

The average hedge fund is up about 1.9% through July this year, and was down -0.6% last year, according to data tracker eVestment.  

Some big-name funds have even started to cut staff as investors balk at paying high fees for lackluster performance. 

That has led to much soul searching. Why are hedge funds doing so poorly?

Here are some of the most cited excuses funds use for the underperformance.

SEE ALSO: This is the biggest trend in the hedge fund world right now

SEE ALSO: $9 BILLION HEDGE FUND: There's one big problem with Netflix

SEE ALSO: BLACK SWAN FUND: 'There's going to be chaos'

Everyone looks the same

Doug Haynes, the president of Steve Cohen's family office Point72 Asset Management, said that the industry's lack of diversity in thought is causing its problems. 

Groupthink on trades is a big problem, and much of that is caused by people in the industry having come from the same schools, studying the same things and being predominantly male, he said.



They're too big

Some funds are getting too big and chasing the same strategies, according to a recent Barclays survey.

"[T]he issue is likely not the growth in size of the overall HF industry, as there appears to be an ample supply of assets," according to the report. "The issue may be, however, the growth in size of many individual HFs, which are pursuing similar strategies leading to crowding."

The report surveyed investors in hedge funds managing about $8 trillion in total.



There is a lot of mediocrity

Howard Marks, cofounder of Oaktree Capital Management, had some scathing words for the hedge fund industry earlier this summer.

"In 2004, I said today there are 5,000 hedge funds, and I don't think they're run by 5,000 geniuses. Today we're probably up to 10,000.

"The performance of the greatest hedge funds run by geniuses, and their closing, created a big umbrella over this industry, which permitted the other 9,990 hedge fund managers to start hedge funds and command hedge fund fees."

In other words, the hedge fund industry was launched by a handful of genius investors (Marks could be referring to people like Jim Simons), and the rest of the industry has followed in their path, despite not being as smart or as profitable as their forebears.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The activist hedge fund that shook up Yahoo is crushing it

$
0
0

Jeff Smith, CEO and chief investment officer of Starboard Value, L.P., speaks at a panel discussion at the SALT conference in Las Vegas May 14, 2014. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

The activist hedge fund that shook up Yahoo is crushing it as many of its peers struggle.

New York-based Starboard Value's flagship fund is up 8.25% through July this year, according to a performance document viewed by Business Insider.

That compares with a 4.36% return for the HFRI event-driven index, which measures Starboard's activist competitors, over the same period.

Meanwhile, the average hedge fund, which includes firms employing all strategies, is up about only 3% this year through July, according to Hedge Fund Research.

Activist hedge funds try to boost companies' stock values by taking big stakes in the companies and influencing changes with management.

Starboard Value, which manages about $4.7 billion in assets, has influenced Yahoo. In April, Yahoo agreed to add four of Starboard's independent directors to its board, for instance.

Its stock price has been rising since February this year.

Starboard's performance this year represents a return to form for the firm. Last year, the flagship fund dropped 8.55%, for instance. It rose 21.45% and 10.7% in 2014 and 2013, respectively, according to the document.

Screen Shot 2016 08 18 at 3.22.24 PM

Starboard's Yahoo position is the hedge fund's largest, making up about 15.7% of its fund, the investor update said.

Starboard's next biggest stock positions are Marvell Technology Group, Advance Auto Parts, The Brink's Company, WestRock Company, and Depomed, Inc. It also holds positions in Macy's, Office Depot, and Darden Restaurants, according to the document.

The firm also announced a new stake in Stewart Information earlier this week, Bloomberg reported.

Press contacts for Starboard didn't respond to requests for comment.

SEE ALSO: Hedge funds have started bashing themselves — here's what they're saying

SEE ALSO: This is the biggest trend in the hedge fund world right now

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: There’s a glaring security problem with those new credit card chips

The tide may be turning for the hedge fund industry

$
0
0

wave drenched wet

The hedge fund industry has had a tough run.

Hedge funds on average have returned about 3% this year, according to Goldman Sachs, while the S&P 500 is up by about 7%.

The hedge funds themselves have had a plethora of excuses for this poor performance, including the size of some industry players and the industry's lack of diversity.

One of the recurring complaints is that hedge funds are all investing in the same things, in a phenomenon known as crowding.

Crowding hasn't always been a problem. It used to work. In fact, piling in to popular names has traditionally been a winning bet.

But since the tail end of 2015, indexes populated by crowded names have been dropping sharply, affecting a big chunk of the hedge fund industry. In an important development for the industry, however, there are signs that is starting to change.

Goldman Sachs just published its hedge fund monitor report, and it found that the performance of its hedge fund VIP basket, a group of stocks that are hedge fund favorites, had started to turn around. Here's Goldman:

"From August 2015 through June 2016, the VIP basket lagged the S&P 500 by nearly 1500 bp (-17% vs. -3%), a period of historically poor weakness exceeding even the 2008 financial crisis. However, during the post-Brexit equity rally, the basket has begun to claw back, outperforming the S&P 500 by nearly 500 bp (+14.5% vs. +9.8%)."

And here is a chart showing the rebound:

Screen Shot 2016 08 19 at 9.19.20 AM

That isn't to say everything is fine and dandy in hedge fund land. Even with this rebound, performance is still underwhelming. Here's Goldman again:

"Even with the recent rally in the most popular long positions, the average hedge fund has returned just 3% YTD, lagging the S&P 500 for the eighth year in a row. Many active managers continue to struggle in 2016, with the average large-cap core mutual fund also lagging the S&P 500."

Still, the turnaround is a bit of good news during an otherwise challenging period.

SEE ALSO: Hedge funds have started bashing themselves — here's what they're saying

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: MALCOLM GLADWELL: ‘Anyone who gives a single dollar to Princeton has completely lost their mind'

PRESENTING: The 9 stocks that matter most to hedge funds

$
0
0

group hug rugby players

Presenting: the hedge fund darlings of 2016.

Goldman Sachs recently published its latest Very Important Position list of stocks that appear the most among the funds' largest 10 holdings.

One disclaimer: The list was compiled based on recent 13-F filings hedge funds made. These stocks were held as of the end of the second quarter, and the funds could have since changed their positions.

Goldman ranked the stocks based on the number of funds that had it as a top-10 holding.

Here are the top nine, in descending order:

Apple

Ticker: AAPL

Subsector: Technology Hardware Storage & Peripherals

No. of funds with stock as top-10 holding: 42

No. of funds with 10 to 200 positions owning stock: 61

% of equity cap owned by hedge funds: 1%

Return year-to-date: 6%

Source: Goldman Sachs



Yahoo

Ticker: YHOO

Subsector: Internet Software & Services

No. of funds with stock as top-10 holding: 43

No. of funds with 10 to 200 positions owning stock: 60

% of equity cap owned by hedge funds: 19%

Return year-to-date: 18%

Source: Goldman Sachs



Microsoft

Ticker: MSFT

Subsector: Systems Software

No. of funds with stock as top-10 holding: 43

No. of funds with 10 to 200 positions owning stock: 73

% of equity cap owned by hedge funds: 2%

Return year-to-date: 6%

Source: Goldman Sachs



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The hedge fund industry is trying to get rid of its biggest problem

$
0
0

wildabeest stampede

The hedge fund industry has a crowding problem.

There are, it seems, too many hedge funds making too many of the same bets.

As a result, hedge fund performance has lagged relative to broad stock indexes.

But according to Goldman Sachs' latest hedge fund trend report, funds spent the second quarter of the year trying to undo at least some of this crowding that, it seems, has led to stagnant industry-wide returns.

"Although hedge funds maintained their sector and factor tilts coming into 3Q, the extended period of popular long position underperformance reduced the amount of hedge fund crowding relative to 1Q 2016," Goldman wrote in its report.

"Exhibit 8 shows a measure of hedge fund 'crowding' calculated as the effective number of stocks in the aggregate hedge fund portfolio. Using this measure, crowding reached a record high in 1Q 2016. It then declined sharply in 2Q as funds spread assets into new investment ideas in response to the painful and prolonged underperformance of hedge fund VIPs. Similarly, our VIP basket saw a turnover of 18 stocks this quarter, only modestly above the long-term average of 16 stocks per quarter but the highest rate since 2012."

Screen Shot 2016 08 19 at 9.15.21 AMIn English, Goldman's analysis effectively says hedge funds are still betting on what they, as an industry, have been betting on — "maintained their sector and factor tilts"— but have also made a major effort to put money into new ideas during the quarter.

But if the hedge fund industry's performance problem is about too many funds being in too many of the same stocks, the density of hedge fund portfolios still presents some major barriers.

The following chart from Goldman shows that almost 70% of hedge fund assets are made up of the average fund's top 10 holdings. Said another way, the industry is mostly betting on just a handful of ideas.

Screen Shot 2016 08 19 at 9.37.08 AM

SEE ALSO: The hedge fund industry has a problem

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Couples improved their sex lives in a week with this one simple tip

GOLDMAN: Hedge funds are betting billions that these 19 stocks are going to get demolished

$
0
0

bmw vehicle car crushed demolished

Hedge funds love making waves.

One of the easiest ways to make waves is to announce a huge bet against a giant company.

In Goldman Sachs' quarterly Hedge Fund Trend Monitor, the analysts round up the biggest splashes the hedge fund industry is making right now.

The "Very Important Short List" compiles the largest aggregate short positions of the 841 hedge funds that Goldman tracks. Essentially, these are the companies that hedge funds think will see a stock drop-off.

GE once again stops the list, with Exxon Mobil right behind. New entrants this quarter include Lockheed Martin and Abbott Laboratories. Interestingly, NVIDIA, a maker of semiconductors, also makes the list despite (or because) the stock being up 92% year-to-date.

We've ranked the stocks from smallest dollar value of short interest to largest. The percentage of floated stock that is short interest and the companies' performance year-to-date are also included.

Corning

Ticker: INTC

Subsector: Semiconductors

Value of short interest (in billions): $2.3

Short interest of % of float: 1%

Return year-to-date: 4%

Source: Goldman Sachs



Express Scripts Holdings

Ticker: ESRX

Subsector: Healthcare Services

Value of short interest (in billions): $2.1

Short interest of % of float: 4%

Return year-to-date: -12%

Source: Goldman Sachs



Walmart

Ticker: WMT

Subsector: Hypermarkets and Supercenters

Value of short interest (in billions): $2.1

Short interest of % of float: 2%

Return year-to-date: 22%

Source: Goldman Sachs



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Here's the meltdown Bill Ackman had when he found out what was going on at Valeant

$
0
0

Bill Ackman CNBC

You think you know a guy.

Billionaire investor Bill Ackman, founder of Pershing Square Capital Management, had been working with Michael Pearson, the former CEO of Valeant Pharmaceuticals, for over a year when it was revealed that the company was funneling drugs through a shady secret pharmacy called Philidor.

And according to court documents filed by mutual fund T. Rowe Price, an investor in Valeant now suing the company, when Ackman started to understand what was going on, he sent a succession of increasingly desperate-sounding emails trying to get Valeant executives to come clean.

The fact that investors like Ackman and T. Rowe were allegedly lied to by Valeant's management is the very crux of this lawsuit. T. Rowe is accusing Valeant of lying about its growth, its price gouging practices, Philidor, its other "captive pharmacies," its use of patient assistance programs to preserve high prices, the depth of its legal risk, and its lack of compliance and controls.

And so it's important to understand how taken aback everyone really was.

"I don't think you are handling this correctly and the company is at risk of getting into a death spiral as a result," Ackman wrote on October 27, two days before Valeant cut ties with Philidor. Valeant's stock has fallen around 90% since that time.

What's beef?

Of course, since Pearson had kept Ackman woefully uninformed about how the company was actually making money, according to the court documents, he didn't really know what "clean" was. All he could say was that "investors fear fraud."

But on October 27, he'd had enough.

More from that email, from the court documents:

"In another email that day, Ackman wrote to Ingram, Pearson, Schiller, Morfit, and Little regarding The New York Times article by Joe Nocera on whether Valeant was the 'Next Enron?' in which the reporter wrote that 'Valeant . . . is a sleazy company.'

"Ackman said, 'When one of the most credible journalists in the world accuses you of being the next Enron, time is short.' He warned that '[y]our reputation and that of the rest of the board along with the company is at grave risk of being destroyed on a permanent basis.'

"Ackman criticized Pearson for ending the last conference call abruptly, and said: 'When Mike said that you were running out of time on the call, he was right in that the company is running out of time to save itself. When shareholders hear that management doesn’t have time to address their concerns, they assume the worst. There is no amount of time that should [be] spared addressing shareholders [sic] concerns.'"

And later that day (emphasis added):

"'Valeant has become toxic. Doctors will stop prescribing your products' and 'Regulators around the world will start investigating and competing to find problems with every element of your business.'

"Ackman said, 'The only people that need scripts and limited questions are crooks. Joe Nocera is right. You look like Enron.'

"Ackman added, 'You should assume that the truth will come out eventually so there is zero downside to having it out now' and 'If mistakes have been made, admit them immediately and apologize.'

"Ackman closed the email by stating: 'You have previously made the mistake of waiting while Rome was burning. There is now a conflagration. It takes no time to prepare for a conference call to tell the truth. The time to do it is today. We are on the brink of tragedy. Please do the right thing.''"

Due diligence

Indeed, throughout the complaint it's alleged that Pearson was in the driver's seat, and that Bill Ackman was only too happy to recline in the passenger seat and take a nap as he broke the speed limit.

But that is not to say that Ackman wasn't warned. As early as January 2015, experts were telling him that something was amiss with Valeant's pricing practices.

From the complaint (emphasis added):

"Drew Katz ('Katz') wrote an email to Bill Ackman ('Ackman'), CEO of Pershing Square and a director of Valeant, complaining that 'Valeant charges approximately $300,000/yr for the average does [sic] needed for a patient with WD [Wilson's disease] (200X higher than Merck charged when it owned the drug. Merck did not raise its rates for . . . 20 years.'

"Katz noted that '[w]e hear that healthcare providers are now beginning to deny coverage due to the cost of the drug. And those without coverage are in real trouble.' Ackman forwarded the email to Pearson warning that 'Drew is a very politically connected and influential person.'"

A forwarded email is not necessarily throwing down the hammer for the good of your investors. We've asked Pershing Square if it followed up on any of Katz's statements itself and are awaiting a response.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Warren Buffett's sister needs your help giving away millions

Aspiring 'finance bros' may have a hard time getting a job at the world's biggest hedge fund

$
0
0

the wolf of wall street

Anyone living in New York City is familiar with the stereotypical "finance bro"— the young guy with a job on Wall Street who acts as if he never left his frat house.

According to former entry-level employees who spoke to Business Insider, you won't find many of these people at Bridgewater Associates, the world's largest hedge fund.

If we're talking about personality stereotypes, said one person, then you're more likely to find an entry-level employee who's "nerdy" and introverted.

And there's a much higher chance they don't have the finance background of many of their Wall Street counterparts.

Hedge funds have always been somewhat removed from the world of Wall Street banks, but Bridgewater is in a league of its own. Nestled in the woods of Westport, Connecticut, the firm operates on a system of "radical transparency" established by its founder, Ray Dalio. Over the past 40 years, Dalio has established a set of investment and management principles that constitute the machinery of his 1,700-person firm with $150 billion in assets under management.

Dalio's management and life insights are known simply as the "Principles," and every employee must become familiar with all 210. "Pain + Reflection = Progress" are words to live by at Bridgewater, and all employees learn to "probe" each other, which entails questioning each other's logic in a stoic, unfiltered way. Most meetings are recorded digitally on an audio or video file, and each week, one of these videos is used in a companywide email for training purposes.

Needless to say, this environment requires a certain type of personality, and Dalio doesn't limit his recruiting efforts to like minds from the financial world. On the company's website, college internships and jobs for new college graduates are broken down into management, investment, and technology associate roles, and it's made clear that none require a financial background.

"We look for individuals with extraordinary intellectual capacity and curiosity, as well as the ability to rapidly learn and apply new concepts," the job posting for an investment associate reads. "We seek diversified educational backgrounds for our team and therefore encourage applicants from all academic disciplines to join."

Financial experience would become more valuable for higher-level investment positions, but the general ethos applies to senior-level hires as well. For example, Dalio hired Silicon Valley veteran Jon Rubinstein as co-CEO earlier this year partially because Dalio valued Rubinstein's mentorship by Steve Jobs.

The site also includes a video testimonial from a senior employee, identified as Bob E., who says he studied botany before joining Bridgewater after graduation.

ray dalioA former employee said that to them it felt like the more an entry-level candidate wanted a traditional finance career, the less likely they were to get a job at Bridgewater. This person said that as graduation approached, they felt at a loss for what to do next, thinking that only a "weird" company would accept them for their eclectic background.

Brian Kreiter, Bridgewater's head of client service and marketing and cohead of its core management team, told Business Insider he wouldn't go so far as to say that the company avoids young employees with traditional finance backgrounds, but that its approach allows for a much more diverse set of backgrounds than you may find elsewhere.

"We think of people in terms of the building blocks of their values, their abilities, and their skills," he said. This means that recruiters will be searching for the top students at elite colleges, even if that person studied art history or psychology. While this isn't unheard of — Steve Cohen's family office Point72 recruits some fresh graduates with liberal arts backgrounds if they are interested in learning about finance — Bridgewater takes it to the next level.

Bridgewater would not reveal how many people it hired 2015, but said that 10% were directly from campus recruiting, and that entry-level employees with nonfinance backgrounds are enrolled in a 15-month program where they learn in a classroom setting, typically for two three-hour sessions each week. Bridgewater's unusually large size and resources for a hedge fund allow it to invest so heavily in training and education.

"From a values perspective, we're trying to understand the way the world works — that's what our business is — and so we're really interested in people that have a sort of deep curiosity, people that have the patience to understand deep and complex systems," Kreiter said. "Now, whether those are biological systems, or economic systems, or political systems, it doesn't really matter. Somebody who has an interest in and an ability to understand that deeply is interesting to us."

If you have firsthand knowledge of what it's like to work at the world's largest hedge fund, reach out to rfeloni@businessinsider.com. We can offer anonymity.

SEE ALSO: Here's why the world's largest hedge fund makes applicants take 5 personality tests before sitting through hours of intensive interviews

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: MALCOLM GLADWELL: ‘Anyone who gives a single dollar to Princeton has completely lost their mind'


'Hedge fund' doesn't mean anything anymore — that's why they've been such a disappointment

$
0
0

BI Graphics_Hedge Funds_lead image

For the last eight years, hedge fund investors have been paying high fees for lackluster performance. 

There are rare exceptions — this New York fund is crushing competitors— but for the most part, hedge fund managers have come up with layers of excuses for why they are performing so poorly.

It wasn't always this way.

Decades ago, there were only a few funds, catering to rich people in the know, and those investors were happy to pay high fees in exchange for high returns.

Now, it's a $3 trillion industry, and many of the investors are institutional pension funds. 

And, most importantly, what we call "hedge funds" has changed drastically. 

'Hedge' used to mean something

aw jonesIn the late 1940s, a journalist and sociologist named Alfred Winslow Jones had an idea. He decided to buy stocks using borrowed money to magnify his profits. He also bet against stocks, profiting if they lost value.

Jones "shorted" stocks, meaning he bet they'd go down.

He called this strategy "hedging"— and it was in 1949 that he turned this idea into an investment firm and what is thought to be the first hedge fund.

(Jones actually called it a "hedged fund.")

Jones' fund made mega money for his clients, usually rich families, and he became a legend on Wall Street. His firm gained 670% in the preceding 10 years, compared with a 358% gain for the leading mutual fund of that time, according to a 1966 Fortune article by legendary financial journalist Carol Loomis.

The firm still exists and is now run by Jones' grandson, Robert Burch IV.

Even as late as 1966, journalists like Loomis were putting the term "hedge fund" in quotes. The idea was still novel.

These days, the term has lost its quotes and also a lot of its meaning. In fact, some hedge funds don't hedge at all.

OK, so what's a hedge fund today?

It can be a lot of things.

There are hedge funds that act like mutual funds.

There are hedge funds that invest in only the arcane or the bizarre — like lawsuit funding or the right to develop the space above a building.

Some bet on trends in the world economy.

Others employ math geniuses with Ph.D.s to program computers to trade for them.

A hedge fund can be a guy in his basement or thousands of people in a headquarters in Connecticut.

So, what do hedge funds have in common? Not much other than that they're really expensive.

"Hedge funds are a fee structure — it's really the only defining factor," said Joe Marenda, a hedge fund consultant at Cambridge Associates.

BI Graphics_Hedge Funds 2 and 20Traditionally, hedge funds collect 2% of their clients' assets. So if a rich person or a pension fund puts $100,000 in a hedge fund, then the fund collects $2,000 before it even does anything.

This means huge hedge funds, even if they don't perform particularly well, can generate a hefty dose of income on the management fee alone, making the hedge fund business potentially very lucrative.

With that $100,000, the fund would then invest the remaining $98,000. If its value goes up, then the hedge fund gets to collect a lot more money: 20% of the original investment's gains. So, if it's worth $110,000 in a year, then the hedge fund keeps another $2,000.

But most hedge funds can't command that fee structure anymore. Investors have been asking for lower fees as performance has slumped and thousands of new hedge funds have entered the market. A closer estimate of what the average hedge fund gets paid is a 1.6% management fee and a 19.4% performance fee, according to Preqin, a data tracker. A startup hedge fund will most likely charge fees lower than that, managers say.

But compared with boring index funds — some charging fees as low as 0.05% — hedge funds are a lucrative business.

How do they do?

You'd think that if hedge funds are charging so much, then they ought to be performing far better than the stock market as a whole.

Sometimes they do, but overall, hedge fund returns have been rather lousy in recent years. This has led to frustration and anxiety among investors. So, hedge funds have started to market their purpose differently — highlighting that they may lose less money when markets tumble, rather than consistently outperform indexes like the S&P 500.

hedge fund index vs spxMany funds said that they could make money in good markets and bad, and indeed, some hedge funds profited even as markets tanked in the latest financial crisis. But performance since then has been lackluster, and even those that had performed well in the past have wavered.

Many investors worry that the bigger hedge funds are getting too big, chasing the same strategies and crowding one another out. This, to some extent, may have caused underperformance among the biggest hedge funds recently, according to a Barclays report.

Macro conditions — what's happening in the world economy — have become the common excuse of late. One notable hedge fund startup, Tourbillon Capital, named low interest rates, for instance, as one reason that its performance has dropped double digits this year.

And there are worries that hedge funds may not perform the way they used to. Since 2008, investors would have been better off in the boring old S&P 500 than the average hedge fund. 

pershing square

Transparency issues

To many, hedge funds are mysterious and secretive. Some don't even have websites, and when they do, it's often a spartan home page. Until the financial crisis — and the Dodd-Frank Act — funds didn't even have to register with the government.

Even with registration, hedge funds usually disclose little about how they make their money, other than a general strategy summary in their public filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. For more detailed info, you have to ask the manager directly, which usually means that you have to be an investor.

But even then, the manager may not tell you. Hedge funds can be black boxes, offering only vague disclosures of how they invest their clients' cash. They might tell you that they put money into private companies but not how they value those investments. Or they may shift money around rapidly, giving investors no way to keep track of where their money is.

Hedge funds, like this one, will often say that they shouldn't even be compared to a benchmark index because their strategy is so distinctive. That same fund also requires investors to sign a confidentiality agreement to be able to see the full portfolio.

In addition, most hedge funds lock investors' money up for a period of time — usually a quarter of a year — but it could be up to several years. So if you don't like the way things are going, then you can't pull your money out all at once.

How do you invest?

BI Graphics_Hedge Funds guy in basementBI Graphics_Hedge Funds big hedge fund buildingBI Graphics_Hedge Funds human led hedge fundBI Graphics_Hedge Funds hedge fund algorythmsIf, after all that, with the expensive fees and mysterious strategies, you still want to invest in a hedge fund, then you probably can't — unless you're really rich.

These are the rules on how rich you have to be before you can invest in a hedge fund, according to the SEC:

  • either you've earned more than $200,000 — or $300,000 together with a spouse — in each of the prior two years and reasonably expect the same for the current year, or
  • you have a net worth of over $1 million, either alone or together with a spouse, excluding the value of your home

That's for individuals. But increasingly, it's big institutional investors piling into hedge funds: public pensions, college endowments, and foundations representing many middle-class Americans.

This has meant that hedge funds have also become more institutional in nature, hiring bigger compliance staffs and investor-relations teams to manage a broader investor base.

Some institutional investors are getting cold feet about hedge funds, seeing their high fees and paltry returns as not worth the risk and effort. The New York City Employee Retirement System, the city's pension for civil employees, and other big pensions decided to eliminate or reduce their hedge fund investments recently.

All hedge fund managers are rich, right?

Not necessarily.

It's no secret that hedge fund managers have become some of the world's richest people. They include billionaires George Soros, Steve Cohen, Paul Singer, Alan Howard, and Ray Dalio. Many of them make big political donations, on the left and the right, and manage money for some of the biggest pots of public money: public pensions.

But it's also inaccurate to say that every hedge fund manager makes bank.

Some estimates put the number of hedge funds at about 11,000 today. Most of them are small funds with a handful of people working there. The business isn't lucrative unless you can raise a lot of money from outside investors on top of performing well. Many don't.

On the other end is a firm like Bridgewater. With $150 billion in assets, it's the world's biggest hedge fund firm by far. The Westport, Connecticut-based Bridgewater employs about 1,700 people. Its founder, Dalio, took home $1.4 billion last year, making him only the third-highest-earning hedge fund manager for 2015, according to Institutional Investor's Alpha.

James Simons, of the secretive computer-driven Renaissance Technologies, and Ken Griffin, of the Chicago-based Citadel, tied for first, with $1.7 billion.

What else should I know?

Some hedge funds are run by "activist" investors. They try to change companies from within to boost their stocks' value. Bill Ackman, who runs Pershing Square Capital, has tried to change and influence companies like McDonald's and Herbalife.

Others, such as Cevian Capital in the UK, work more behind the scenes.

MORE BI EXPLAINERS: HOW TO READ POLLS: there's more to the margin of error

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Hedge fund manager explains why America does not need to be uneasy about a Trump presidency

A 'Venezuela' is happening in capital markets

$
0
0

venezuela grocery supermarket

This may be the darkest thing we've read about the market in a while.

In a letter to investors marking his hedge fund's 10th anniversary, James Litinsky of JHL Capital said he would rather be investing back in the dark days of 2008 than in the market we're seeing today.

You see, in 2008 the world's assets were simply deflating and reinflating. Opportunities, in that case, abounded.

Now, however, things are very different. Because central banks around the world have kept interest rates at or near zero for so long, asset prices have inflated while real economic growth has remained anemic. Value is increasingly hard to find.

So as investors search desperately to find it, we have what Litinsky described as a "Venezuela" in capital markets:

"When people think about inflation, they often envision a situation like Venezuela, where there are skyrocketing prices and severe shortages of basic goods and services. This is a garden variety inflation example of too much money chasing too few goods that leads to spiraling prices. The chaos caused is very obvious.

"Global Central Banks have given us another kind of inflation, currently isolated to financial assets. They have printed so much money and so severely manipulated market prices (via an extreme floor on bond prices) such that there is a 'Venezuela' happening in the capital markets. Think of it as chaos in the streets for money people who are 'searching for yield' or lining up to find the assets they need. Clearly, a financial asset shortage is not as dire as a real goods shortage like Venezuela. We do not consume our bonds like rice, packaged soup or toilet paper. Yet, it is naïve to think that there will not be dramatic long-term societal consequences."

What are these "long-term societal consequences"? Low rates have been, in part, a monetary solution where a political one was and is more necessary. They are a symptom of the global political class' abdication of responsibility. They help explain why so many people desperately want change.

It's where you get your Donald Trumps, your Brexits, your far-right this and your far-left that. It's where you get into a world of "unknown, unknowns."

There will be blood

In the meantime, there will be crowding. That crowding will lead to some interesting circumstances. Back in May, billionaire money manager Steve Cohen of Point 72 Asset Management said such crowding blew a hole in his portfolio earlier this year.

"One of my biggest worries is that there are so many players out there trying to do the same strategies ... if one big one goes down, will we take collateral damage?" Cohen said at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles."We were down 8% in February, and for us that's a lot ... My worst fears were realized."

That's one consequence. Another will happen when rates eventually rise and asset prices fall.

Back in October, at the Grant's Interest Rate Observer conference in New York City, Litinsky presented his vision of what would happen. He hypothesized that all of the companies that had taken advantage of low interest rates and piled into debt to grow into massive conglomerates over the past few years would get punished.

Of course, who knows when that will happen.

"No one knows whether this environment will last for another decade or if investor psychology will reverse tomorrow," Litinsky wrote in his letter. "One truth is very clear to me. Plenty of rewards may be available, but they entail assuming ever higher levels of risk with diminishing rewards."

SEE ALSO: This is the presentation that has Wall Street freaked out about big conglomerates

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: MALCOLM GLADWELL: ‘Anyone who gives a single dollar to Princeton has completely lost their mind'

Hedge fund managers are waiting for the world to change

$
0
0

Hedge fund managers seem to be waiting for the world to change.

It's well known at this point that these funds are having a tough time of it. They have returned about 3% this year on average, according to Goldman Sachs, while the S&P 500 is up by about 7%.

The hedge funds themselves have had a plethora of excuses for this poor performance, including the complaint that market conditions are making it much harder for them to eke out a return.

Their response: making concentrated bets and sticking to them.

Here is Goldman Sachs:

"Hedge fund position turnover dipped back to 27% during 2Q 2016, matching its record low. Turnover of the largest quartile of hedge fund positions, which account for two-thirds of hedge fund long holdings, fell slightly to 14%."

What this means in plain English is that hedge funds are turning over their portfolio less, or holding on to their positions longer. Here's the chart, showing decreasing turnover over time:

Screen Shot 2016 08 19 at 9.56.10 AM

The right-hand side of the chart, looking at the average "density" of hedge fund portfolios, shows the extent to which hedge funds are making concentrated bets. Here is Goldman again:

"Hedge fund portfolio density remains near record highs. Hedge fund returns continue to depend on the performance of a few key stocks. The typical hedge fund has 69% of its long-equity assets invested in its 10 largest positions. This statistic compares with 33% for the typical large-cap mutual fund, 22% for the average small-cap mutual fund, 18% for the S&P 500 and just 2% for the Russell 2000 Index."

Screen Shot 2016 08 19 at 9.37.08 AM

Hedge funds are paid to make concentrated bets, though one recent problem is that they have all been making the same concentrated bets.

Still, it looks as if hedge funds are holding on to their positions and waiting for the market to turn in their favor.

SEE ALSO: The tide may be turning for the hedge fund industry

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: MALCOLM GLADWELL: ‘Anyone who gives a single dollar to Princeton has completely lost their mind'

The amazing story behind the world's first hedge fund

$
0
0

aw jones

The first hedge fund looked nothing like most of those in operation today.

The founder had little investing experience and had bounced around careers in diplomacy, sociology, and journalism before settling on investing at age 48.

Alfred Winslow Jones is widely thought to have created the first "hedged fund" in the late 1940s (though some credit legendary value investor Ben Graham).

He got the idea while researching a markets article for Fortune magazine.

Jones' concept was simple: create a "hedge" by shorting stocks he thought would drop in value while going long, and sometimes using leverage, on stocks he thought would go up. This is a basic hedge fund strategy today but was novel at the time.

To short means to bet that a stock price will drop, while using leverage means using borrowed money to boost bets.

His strategy did phenomenally well and made lots of money for his clients. According to a 1966 Fortune article by legendary reporter Carol Loomis, Jones's firm gained 670% in the preceding 10 years, compared with a 358% gain for the leading mutual fund of the period.

Here's more on the then-new strategy from his firm's website:

"Each technique was considered risky and highly speculative, but when properly combined together would result in a conservative portfolio. The realization that one could use speculative techniques to conservative ends was the most important step in forming the hedged fund. Using his knowledge of statistics from his background as a sociologist, Jones developed a measure of market and stock-specific risk to better manage the exposure of his portfolio."

Jones spawned the modern hedge fund industry, which now counts about 11,000 funds worldwide — though many hedge funds today look nothing like Jones'. Today's hedge funds adopt lots of different strategies, and some don't even hedge.

For more on the sprawling history of hedge funds, read Business Insider's explainer.

SEE ALSO: 'Hedge fund' doesn't mean anything anymore — that's why they've been such a disappointment

SEE ALSO: Hedge funds have started bashing themselves — here's what they're saying

SEE ALSO: The activist hedge fund that shook up Yahoo is crushing it

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Warren Buffett's sister needs your help giving away millions

What it's like to have your world turned upside down by an insider trading conviction

$
0
0

preet bharara

What's it like to be convicted of insider trading and later freed?

William D. Cohan wrote a fascinating profile for Fortune about Todd Newman, the hedge fund manager at now defunct Diamondback Capital, whose case has raised questions about the definition of insider trading.

According to the government's case against him, Newman allegedly heard fourthhand information that he then traded on. Newman has maintained his innocence, and he racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees defending himself, according to the Fortune piece.

Here's more from the article:

"As he reflects on the events that reshaped his life, Newman, 51, shows traces of bitterness but mostly exudes calm and a degree of satisfaction. That perspective has come only with time, though. The day the feds came calling, his feelings ran more toward fear, panic, and confusion."

In the Fortune article, Newman recounts the months he waited to see if he would be charged with wrongdoing, and how he feared that his young daughter would see him being arrested.

In 2013, Newman was sentenced to 54 months in federal prison. In December 2014, an appeals court overturned his conviction.

Much had been written about the legal meaning of that overturning, but Fortune's story is the first time we hear Newman's perspective.

Today, Newman says he cannot find another job in the hedge fund industry, and he plans to start a business that would help others through experiences like his, Fortune reported.

One suggestion from Business Insider: He might try reaching out to this Connecticut couple that ministers to people who are convicted of white-collar crime.

Read the full Fortune story »

SEE ALSO: This is what it's like when the 1% go to jail, according to a couple that ministers to their families

SEE ALSO: 'Hedge fund' doesn't mean anything anymore

SEE ALSO: A look inside the huge hedge fund that just went big on Morgan Stanley

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A self-made millionaire describes the financial mistakes to avoid if you want to get rich by 30

OMEGA: 'The in-place equity bull market should last a long time'

$
0
0

RTR3AZVM

It's a good time to be in stocks, according to Omega Advisors' Steve Einhorn.

The stock market should forge ahead on its bull run, Einhorn said in an email Sunday to macro traders that was viewed by Business Insider.

Strong manufacturing data is supporting solid numbers in the consumer and housing sectors, according to Einhorn, vice chairman of Lee Cooperman's $5.5 billion hedge fund Omega.

"I believe the manufacturing
 sector has exited [its] recession and is now growing,
" he wrote in the email. "T]his would be a plus for the US economy in that it would contribute to a long lasting expansion, and a growing manufacturing sector would lift [S&P500 earnings per share] and help sustain [earnings per share] growth."

In turn, the manufacturing-sector recovery, combined with a low neutral federal funds rate, is increasing "the odds of a long lasting US equity bull market," Einhorn wrote.

Wait what is a hedge fund

The view echoes a 48-page note that Einhorn cowrote last month, in which Omega explained why there's not much to worry about in the economy.

Einhorn, in his more recent note, pointed out several data points that show an improvement in manufacturing:

  • Industrial production 
  • Manufacturing PMI 
  • Earnings from S&P 500 industrial companies in the second quarter, excluding transportation, which is up year over year
  • Firmer oil/commodity prices.

An additional data point released Thursday, core capital-goods orders showed strong numbers, further supporting Einhorn's point about manufacturing, he told Business Insider by telephone.

This "says to me that we are in an economic expansion that will last a long time," he said. "That is a reason, [though] not the only reason, to believe that the in-place equity bull market should last a long time ... at least another two years, if not longer."

US shares in particular should benefit, he added. But there are also other ways investors could make money off of manufacturing's strength, he wrote in the email, including:

"Shorting the short end of our yield curve, though this could be (has been) a tough trade given the Federal Reserve is likely to continue to go slow in its tightening; companies that are most leveraged via revenue/[earnings per share] to better manufacturing activity/firmer commodity prices, where valuation is attractive (I leave this to our relevant analysts). Year to date, the industrial sector ETF is up 12.5% vs 7% for the [S&P 500]."

BI Explains: What is a hedge fund? Not all make billions

SEE ALSO: The rich are getting more secretive with their money

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 'We're not playing games any longer': Trump ramps up his rhetoric on China

After three years of Herbalife, Bill Ackman still doesn't get Carl Icahn

$
0
0

Bill ackman carl icahn CNBC

Bill Ackman is that guy at a basketball game who keeps chanting after everyone else has stopped.

Ackman is crowing over the fact that his nemesis, Carl Icahn, almost sold part of Icahn Enterprise's 18% stake in Herbalife to a consortium of buyers including himself, as revealed by The Wall Street Journal.

His exuberance shows he's missing a very important, but simple, point: For everyone but Ackman, the long, national nightmare that was his Herbalife crusade is over.

It's especially over for Icahn, because to beat Ackman, his longtime frenemy, Icahn doesn't need to see the stock thrive — it just has to survive.

And it looks like that is exactly what will happen.

In May, the Federal Trade Commission ordered Herbalife to pay a fine for abusive practices. It stopped short, though, of accusing the company of being a pyramid scheme. Since 2013, Ackman has insisted that the firm is in fact a pyramid scheme and that he will short the company to zero.

Ackman maintains that the changes that Herbalife has to make to its business will eventually bring it down. In the meantime, though, Icahn is still holding his shares.

To zero and beyond

Almost immediately after the WSJ story hit the Street, Ackman went onto CNBC to talk about how Icahn's attempt to sell is a sign that he no longer has conviction in the controversial stock, and that he's made all the money he needs to make.

"Look, I think he knows the company is toast," Ackman said.

Ehhh, maybe. But the reality is that Icahn has rarely been a huge cheerleader for the stock. In fact, he's actually refused to talk about it in interviews. What he was always interested in was the trade and the fact that Ackman was on the other side of it.

Let's go back to the epic interview that catapulted this feud to fame, that fateful day in January 2013 when Icahn and Ackman appeared on CNBC at the same time and literally let each other have it.

Ackman was ready to talk about the merits of his short position and his thesis about Herbalife's business.

Icahn was ready to talk about Ackman.

"Listen, you know, I've really sort of had it with this guy Ackman," Icahn told CNBC.

What followed will be forever recorded in the annals of Wall Street history. Icahn called Ackman a crybaby and said that Ackman reminded him of the little Jewish boys he'd beat up in the school yard during his rough-and-tumble childhood in Queens.

However, when it came to talking about Herbalife, people often forget that Icahn had absolutely nothing to say.

"I want to say what I want to say, and I'm not going to talk about my Herbalife position because you want to bully me," Icahn shouted at CNBC host Scott Wapner. "I don't give a damn about what you want to know."

"You can say what the hell you want. I'm going to talk about what Ackman just said about me, not about Herbalife ... I'll talk about Herbalife when I goddamn want to," Icahn continued. "I'm never going on a show with you again, that's for damn sure."

ackman icahn

Why long? Why not?

So after all of this — after years of calling Ackman's trade "disingenuous," after Icahn told Trish Regan at Bloomberg in 2013 that if Ackman wanted to badmouth a stock publicly he should "join the SEC" (shudder), after the two men called a truce on national television only for Icahn to buy Herbalife stock again — Icahn finally said a few nice, banal things about the company.

Well, at least a couple times.

Even just before the FTC ruling, Icahn's discussion of Herbalife centered on Ackman. The nicest thing he could say about Herbalife was that it creates jobs for people which — yeah, duh.

"Ackman is completely and totally wrong on this company," Icahn said. "You know, Ackman is a smart guy and all, but he is just dead wrong. This company creates work for a lot of people. And to say it doesn't is ridiculous."

For Ackman to believe in Icahn's conviction is like you, dear reader, asking your girlfriend or wife what she wants for Valentine's Day and actually believing her when she says "oh, nothing."

Naturally, we're not the only people who think this way. The entire market has been watching these two men duke it out for years. That may be why Herbalife's stock is down only 3% on the news that its biggest shareholders considered selling.

You see, to Icahn, the Herbalife trade is over because it looks as if he won and Ackman lost. Icahn has moved on.

We reached out to Icahn Enterprises for comment on this story, but we have yet to hear back. Maybe it's August, maybe they just have more interesting things to do.

SEE ALSO: What the heck happened to Bill Ackman?

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: No one wants to buy this bizarre house in a wealthy San Francisco suburb


One of the key men behind Bill Ackman's bet on Valeant is leaving

$
0
0

Bill Ackman

One of Bill Ackman's key researchers on Valeant is leaving Pershing Square and plans to launch a startup focused on reducing healthcare costs.

Jordan Rubin, a member of Ackman's 10-person investment team, is leaving Pershing Square Capital Management in the coming weeks after seven years at the firm.

As an investment analyst, Rubin, 32, contributed to positions including Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Zoetis, Allergan and Family Dollar.

"I think extremely highly of Jordan," Ackman told Business Insider. "He's a very talented, hard working, smart person, and I think he's going to be enormously successful with his new venture."

Rubin and Bill Doyle, who also recently left Pershing Square, led the research that resulted in Pershing Square's "partnership with Valeant in its efforts to merge with Allergan," according to a 2014 letter filed with the SEC.

Rubin also features heavily in 818 pages of Valeant-related information released by the US Senate in connection with its investigation into the pharmaceutical company's business practices. 

Several emails from Rubin to former Valeant CEO Mike Pearson were published in the document dump, along with other emails from Ackman where Rubin was CC'd in.



Wait what is a hedge fund


Rubin's departure comes as Pershing Square hits a rough patch in performance, largely from positions like Valeant, which has dropped in value this year, partly over concerns about the company's drug price hikes.

The Pershing Square L.P. fund fell -16.2% last year after posting 36.9% gains the year before, according to a Pershing Square document. Pershing Square Holdings, a publicly traded vehicle that is a proxy for Ackman's hedge fund, is down -17.8% through August 16.

pershing squareRubin joined Pershing Square in 2009 after a stint at Goldman Sachs, where he worked as an analyst in the special situations group. 

In a statement to Business Insider, Rubin said he was "grateful for the opportunity to have contributed to many profitable and innovative investments at Pershing Square" and that he is "excited to begin the next stage" of his career.

"I hope to follow in the footsteps of other successful Pershing Square alumni who have chosen an entrepreneurial path," he said, adding that he plans to continue to invest in Pershing Square's fund.

Rubin is partnering with an unnamed healthcare entrepreneur for the startup, which will target reducing healthcare costs and is set to launch later this year. 

Other prominent staffers have also departed the firm in recent months. In May, the firm announced that Bill Doyle, who was also behind the Valeant bet, was leaving.

Paul Hilal, Ackman's former second in command, left last year and is in the early stages of starting his own hedge fund

Earlier this year, Pershing Square also cut more than 10% of staff, mostly in operations, due to technological changes.

But there have also been additions. Jenna Dabbs, a former federal prosecutor in New York who was hired last year as senior counsel, joined Ackman's investment staff earlier this summer, making her the first woman ever on the team.

SEE ALSO: What it's like to have your wold turned upside down by an insider trading conviction

SEE ALSO: A look inside the activist fund that just went big on Morgan Stanley

SEE ALSO: The activist hedge fund that shook up Yahoo is crushing it

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: MALCOLM GLADWELL: ‘Anyone who gives a single dollar to Princeton has completely lost their mind'

PAUL TUDOR JONES: 'We have to think outside the box'

$
0
0

Paul Tudor Jones

There are a lot of brilliant investors out there, but very few brilliant investors who are also brilliant communicators. It’s rare to find someone in the investment industry who has the ability to explain complex topics about the markets and investing in a way that a wide audience can understand. That’s why investors are constantly quoting their favorite lines from Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Charlie Munger, Peter Lynch and Howard Marks.

These guys are legends, but they also have the uncanny ability to simplify their message.

If those five (and I’m sure I missed a ton of people on this list) are the go-to quote machines for long-term investors, the following group is not too far behind for traders: Jesse Livermore, Stanley Druckenmiller, George Soros and Paul Tudor Jones.

The last name is on the list because he’s compounded his fund’s capital at something like 20% per year since the early 1980s. He basically called the 1987 crash ahead of time. He manages billions of dollars and is worth billions of dollars.

But according to a recent story in Bloomberg Tudor Investment Corp. has hit a bit of a rough patch, so he’s been forced to make some changes in both the firm and strategy:

“We have to think outside the box,” Jones, 61, said in the letter obtained by Bloomberg. “I firmly believe the changes we have made put us in a position to be successful even in this desultory macro environment.”

Jones’s moves are central to his shakeup of his hedge fund, which this week cut 15 percent of its staff and earlier lowered some fees to stem an exodus of investors, who’ve pulled $2.1 billion this year. His remaining managers will be given more money to run, according to the letter. Some have been paired with scientists and mathematicians to bring new analytical rigor to their trading as part of a quantitative revamp of the firm.

There are a number of different ways you could interpret what’s going on here and in hedge fund land in general. Here are a few thoughts:

1. The low fruit has been picked. The 1960s through the 1990s were something of a Wild West period in the hedge fund world. There were very few funds and they weren’t managing nearly as much capital as they are today. This gave the pioneers in the industry a huge first mover advantage.

In the book More Money Than God another legendary hedge fund manager, Michael Steinhardt, very bluntly discusses some of his firm’s actions on block trading and providing liquidity during that time:

“I was being told things that other accounts were not being told,” Steinhardt says, describing the mechanics of his collusion with brokers. “I got information I shouldn’t have. It created a lot of opportunities for us. Were they risky? Yes. Was I willing to do it? Yes. Were they talked about much? Not particularly.

The regulations back then were extremely lax, so it was much easier for these funds to take advantage of holes in the system. Those types of opportunities aren’t as easily available in today’s markets.

2. Macro is hard. Investors are constantly learning more and more about which strategies and systems work or have worked in the past and are finding ways to turn those ideas into models and quantitative investment programs.

So much of it has been systematized that it’s becoming increasingly difficult for portfolio managers to separate themselves from the algorithms. Hedge fund managers in the early days weren’t competing with the computers like they are now. It’s easy to complain about the Fed, but the truth is that many of the signals these funds used in the past just don’t work as well anymore or are much more crowded than they once were.

3. Low risk free rates are hurting hedge fund performance. Many investors fail to understand how important the return on cash can be for hedge funds. In essence, hedge funds are something of a “cash-plus” stream of returns because of the way they invest. When risk free rates were 5-6%, this was like an additional premium the best hedge funds could layer any alpha on top of. With rates at 1-2% and alpha harder to come by than ever, it’s no wonder that average hedge fund returns have been abysmal.

4. There are legitimate red flags. If you are an institutional asset allocator and you looked at the following it would likely give you pause as an investor (or at least it should):

Tudor is more than doubling its gross Sharpe ratio target, a measure of risk-adjusted returns, for its main fund to about 2.25, according to the letter. And it increased the target for its portfolio’s daily price swings, or volatility, to 45 basis points.

His fund has been underperforming so by all appearances he is upping the risk in the strategy in an effort to earn a higher return. The problem is that these things don’t always work out in a 1:1 ratio. You’re not guaranteed anything on the return side of the equation simply because you accept more risk in your portfolio or fund. Changing the risk embedded in his strategy should at the very least cause his investors to ask themselves some hard questions.

Do these changes make sense in the current market environment? Does he get a pass for being a name brand investor? Have other investors caught up with him and his style of investing? Is it harder for  this fund to earn alpha, especially with a much larger capital base?

There are no easy answers to these questions. This is one of the reasons it’s so difficult to develop long-term relationships with star portfolio managers. Not only is it almost impossible to gain access to their funds, but once you do it’s very hard to know when to walk away and when to stick around. It’s possible these changes will make a difference, but it’s also possible that he’s making a mistake and pressing too much in hopes of a turnaround that never materializes.

5. He’s due for a period of outperformance. It’s also possible that he was due for a period of underperformance that will some day reverse:

Tudor, which Jones founded in 1980, hasn’t in recent years made the kind of profits it produced during its heyday. Its main fund, Tudor BVI Global, produced an average annual gain of about 26 percent from 1987 through 2007, which dropped to about 5.3 percent from 2008 through last year. The fund is down 2.3 percent this year, according to the letter. It lost 4.8 percent in 2008.

Maybe he’s due for a comeback. It’s tough to say one way or another.

Far too many investors have been waiting for the past 10 years or so for a more “normalized environment.” They assume that things will magically return to the way they once were in the past. The problem with this line of thinking is that markets and investors are constantly changing and evolving over time. There’s no such thing as a normalized environment.

This is probably more true in the hedge fund industry than anywhere as competition for both alpha and performance fees has never been higher. As the roughly 11,000 funds in this space continue to jockey for position, many hedge fund managers are going to have to make changes if they want to stay in business.

For those playing the long game that means they may have to be more patient — or find more patient investors. For those playing the short game that means they may have to be more flexible.

The nature of the markets is such that sometimes even the legends run into trouble. I’ll be interested to see if the old guard such as Tudor Jones and company can make the changes necessary to get their groove back.

SEE ALSO: This is where investors have been parking their money so far in 2016

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This animated map shows the most probable path to a Trump victory

Bridgewater just released a series of videos that looks like something Facebook or Google would produce

$
0
0

bridgewater associates

Bridgewater isn't holding back.

"This series of videos that we've prepared for you are to give you a window into what it's like to be here, to scare you away if you're not the right kind of person, to potentially attract you if these ideas — if this way of being — is attractive for you," Greg Jensen, Bridgewater Associates co-CIO and 21-year veteran of the firm, said in a new video on Bridgewater's website, relaunched last week.

The video series reveals a surprisingly extensive amount of footage from within the company and even shows brief clips from recorded meetings, marking a big shift for the usually secretive hedge fund. Founder and co-CIO Ray Dalio even admits that its 18-month attrition rate is as high as 50% for new employees.

The relaunched site portrays Bridgewater in a new light: not scary and removed, but highly competitive and intriguingly unusual. The material has the feel of something a Silicon Valley giant like Facebook or Google, rather than a secretive hedge fund, would produce.

SEE ALSO: These are the personality tests you take to get a job at the world's largest hedge fund

Bridgewater is as well known for being the world's largest hedge fund — with $150 billion in assets and 1,700 employees — as it is for a unique culture that Dalio describes as being based on "radical truth" and "radical transparency."



Employees are encouraged to regularly dissect each other's thinking to determine the root of decision-making, to rate each other's performance using iPad apps, and to send an audio file to any person mentioned in a meeting — all meetings, with few exceptions, are digitally recorded with either audio or video. "Pain + Reflection = Progress" is a guiding phrase.



Dalio founded Bridgewater out of his apartment in 1975 and laid the foundation for its culture through the '80s, but it wasn't until he formalized his management approach in his guide, "Principles," made public in 2010, that the firm began regularly appearing in the media and facing scrutiny.

Critics have accused it of being "bizarre" and like a "cult;" in July, The New York Times published a story that highlighted a harassment claim by a former employee, including his allegation that the hedge fund was a "cauldron of fear and intimidation" (the employee later withdrew his complaint and moved to a new firm).

Dalio has consistently replied that his firm's culture is misunderstood, specifically calling that Times report a "distortion of reality."

The new recruiting material may be Bridgewater's biggest statement yet to defend how it operates.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

ICAHN: Ackman should feel 'boxed in' on Herbalife

$
0
0

Carl Icahn Bill Ackman

The billionaire bickering continues.

Carl Icahn spoke with CNBC on Tuesday, and he carried on his war of words with rival hedge fund manager Bill Ackman.

"If anyone should feel boxed in, it's Ackman," Icahn just told CNBC.com.

Ackman and Icahn have long feuded over Herbalife, with Ackman holding a big short position and Icahn taking the opposite side of the trade.

On Friday, The Wall Street Journal reported that Icahn was discussing selling his shares in Herbalife. That report sent Herbalife shares falling.

Ackman then went on CNBC, saying he thought Icahn "knows that this thing is toast."

Later that day, Icahn surprised markets, upping his stake in Herbalife by buying 2.3 million shares. He also clarified that he hadn't given a sell order on his shares.

In his interview with CNBC on Tuesday, Icahn suggested that Herbalife was in a strange position, having so many shares sold short.

"I don't believe any professional short sellers would ever take a position in a company with these numbers," he said. "As the old saying goes, fools will go where angels fear to tread."

For the full article, head over to CNBC >>

SEE ALSO: JIM ROGERS: 'If we all bought North Korean currency, we'd all be rich someday'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: There’s a glaring security problem with those new credit card chips

The unlikely history behind one of Wall Street's iconic funds

$
0
0

Screen Shot 2016 08 30 at 12.17.20 PM

A fund run by the world's biggest hedge fund firm wasn't supposed to be for outside investors.

Bridgewater's All Weather strategy started out as a way to manage billionaire founder Ray Dalio's personal trust, according to a video just published by the firm as part of a website revamp.

The fund was the first of the "risk parity" movement, a strategy since adopted by firms like AQR Capital and Neuberger Berman. Risk parity attempts to equalize the risks that investors take across asset classes and provide steady returns.

Dalio is worth $15.9 billion, according to Forbes.

"Never was there going to be a product called All Weather," Bob Prince, the firm's co-CIO, named simply "Bob" in the video, said.

Dalio proposed the idea for All Weather, which is supposed to perform well in all market environments, in 1988 or 1989, Prince added in the video.

"Ray asked the question, 'Gee, I wonder what kind of investment portfolio you would hold that would perform well across all environments,'" Prince said.

Dalio imagined four portfolios with an equal amount of risk in them that would do well in different environments. He looked at hundreds of years of history to see how that balanced portfolio would perform over time, and then ran a pilot, putting his own trust money in the fund to begin with.

The All Weather portfolio was launched in 1996.

Screen Shot 2016 08 30 at 1.19.41 PM

"If I could pick one gift, All Weather would be that gift," Dalio said in the video. "It means that without giving up returns, you can have a portfolio that really is safe."

Dalio's trust assets remain in All Weather, and now it manages money for institutional investors like public pensions and endowments. Firmwide, Bridgewater Associates managed $152 billion as of last year, according to a regulatory filing.

The All Weather strategy invests using exchange-traded futures contracts, OTC derivatives, cash securities, and spot and forward contracts in the international currency market, according to the filing.

A 2012 Bridgewater paper goes into more detail on the strategy:

"It is predicated on the notion that asset classes react in understandable ways based on the relationship of their cash flows to the economic environment. By balancing assets based on these structural characteristics the impact of economic surprises can be minimized."

Bridgewater's All Weather strategy was up about 10% through the first half of this year, while Bridgewater's flagship hedge fund, Pure Alpha, fell about 12%.

SEE ALSO: JIM ROGERS: 'If we all bought North Korean currency, we'd all be rich'

DON'T MISS: A key man behind Bill Ackman's Valeant bet is leaving to launch a healthcare startup

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Kobe Bryant is starting a $100-million venture capital fund

Viewing all 3369 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>